Cargando…
Evaluation of dosimetric advantages of using patient‐specific aperture system with intensity‐modulated proton therapy for the shallow depth tumor
In this study, we evaluate dosimetric advantages of using patient‐specific aperture system with intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for head and neck tumors at the shallow depth. We used four types of patient‐specific aperture system (PSAS) to irradiate shallow regions less than 4 g/cm(2) with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5768032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29178546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12231 |
_version_ | 1783292638352375808 |
---|---|
author | Yasui, Keisuke Toshito, Toshiyuki Omachi, Chihiro Hayashi, Kensuke Tanaka, Kenichiro Asai, Kumiko Shimomura, Akira Muramatsu, Rie Hayashi, Naoki |
author_facet | Yasui, Keisuke Toshito, Toshiyuki Omachi, Chihiro Hayashi, Kensuke Tanaka, Kenichiro Asai, Kumiko Shimomura, Akira Muramatsu, Rie Hayashi, Naoki |
author_sort | Yasui, Keisuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, we evaluate dosimetric advantages of using patient‐specific aperture system with intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for head and neck tumors at the shallow depth. We used four types of patient‐specific aperture system (PSAS) to irradiate shallow regions less than 4 g/cm(2) with a sharp lateral penumbra. Ten head and neck IMPT plans with or without aperture were optimized separately with the same 95% prescription dose and same dose constraint for organs at risk (OARs). The plans were compared using dose volume histograms (DVHs), dose distributions, and some dose indexes such as volume receiving 50% of the prescribed dose (V(50)), mean or maximum dose (D(mean) and D(max)) to the OARs. All examples verified in this study had decreased V(50) and OAR doses. Average, maximum, and minimum relative reductions of V(50) were 15.4%, 38.9%, and 1.0%, respectively. D(max) and D(mean) of OARs were decreased by 0.3% to 25.7% and by 1.0% to 46.3%, respectively. The plans with the aperture over more than half of the field showed decreased V(50) or OAR dose by more than 10%. The dosimetric advantage of patient‐specific apertures with IMPT was clarified in many cases. The PSAS has some dosimetric advantages for clinical use, and in some cases, it enables to fulfill dose constraints. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5768032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57680322018-04-02 Evaluation of dosimetric advantages of using patient‐specific aperture system with intensity‐modulated proton therapy for the shallow depth tumor Yasui, Keisuke Toshito, Toshiyuki Omachi, Chihiro Hayashi, Kensuke Tanaka, Kenichiro Asai, Kumiko Shimomura, Akira Muramatsu, Rie Hayashi, Naoki J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics In this study, we evaluate dosimetric advantages of using patient‐specific aperture system with intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for head and neck tumors at the shallow depth. We used four types of patient‐specific aperture system (PSAS) to irradiate shallow regions less than 4 g/cm(2) with a sharp lateral penumbra. Ten head and neck IMPT plans with or without aperture were optimized separately with the same 95% prescription dose and same dose constraint for organs at risk (OARs). The plans were compared using dose volume histograms (DVHs), dose distributions, and some dose indexes such as volume receiving 50% of the prescribed dose (V(50)), mean or maximum dose (D(mean) and D(max)) to the OARs. All examples verified in this study had decreased V(50) and OAR doses. Average, maximum, and minimum relative reductions of V(50) were 15.4%, 38.9%, and 1.0%, respectively. D(max) and D(mean) of OARs were decreased by 0.3% to 25.7% and by 1.0% to 46.3%, respectively. The plans with the aperture over more than half of the field showed decreased V(50) or OAR dose by more than 10%. The dosimetric advantage of patient‐specific apertures with IMPT was clarified in many cases. The PSAS has some dosimetric advantages for clinical use, and in some cases, it enables to fulfill dose constraints. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5768032/ /pubmed/29178546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12231 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Yasui, Keisuke Toshito, Toshiyuki Omachi, Chihiro Hayashi, Kensuke Tanaka, Kenichiro Asai, Kumiko Shimomura, Akira Muramatsu, Rie Hayashi, Naoki Evaluation of dosimetric advantages of using patient‐specific aperture system with intensity‐modulated proton therapy for the shallow depth tumor |
title | Evaluation of dosimetric advantages of using patient‐specific aperture system with intensity‐modulated proton therapy for the shallow depth tumor |
title_full | Evaluation of dosimetric advantages of using patient‐specific aperture system with intensity‐modulated proton therapy for the shallow depth tumor |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of dosimetric advantages of using patient‐specific aperture system with intensity‐modulated proton therapy for the shallow depth tumor |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of dosimetric advantages of using patient‐specific aperture system with intensity‐modulated proton therapy for the shallow depth tumor |
title_short | Evaluation of dosimetric advantages of using patient‐specific aperture system with intensity‐modulated proton therapy for the shallow depth tumor |
title_sort | evaluation of dosimetric advantages of using patient‐specific aperture system with intensity‐modulated proton therapy for the shallow depth tumor |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5768032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29178546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12231 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yasuikeisuke evaluationofdosimetricadvantagesofusingpatientspecificaperturesystemwithintensitymodulatedprotontherapyfortheshallowdepthtumor AT toshitotoshiyuki evaluationofdosimetricadvantagesofusingpatientspecificaperturesystemwithintensitymodulatedprotontherapyfortheshallowdepthtumor AT omachichihiro evaluationofdosimetricadvantagesofusingpatientspecificaperturesystemwithintensitymodulatedprotontherapyfortheshallowdepthtumor AT hayashikensuke evaluationofdosimetricadvantagesofusingpatientspecificaperturesystemwithintensitymodulatedprotontherapyfortheshallowdepthtumor AT tanakakenichiro evaluationofdosimetricadvantagesofusingpatientspecificaperturesystemwithintensitymodulatedprotontherapyfortheshallowdepthtumor AT asaikumiko evaluationofdosimetricadvantagesofusingpatientspecificaperturesystemwithintensitymodulatedprotontherapyfortheshallowdepthtumor AT shimomuraakira evaluationofdosimetricadvantagesofusingpatientspecificaperturesystemwithintensitymodulatedprotontherapyfortheshallowdepthtumor AT muramatsurie evaluationofdosimetricadvantagesofusingpatientspecificaperturesystemwithintensitymodulatedprotontherapyfortheshallowdepthtumor AT hayashinaoki evaluationofdosimetricadvantagesofusingpatientspecificaperturesystemwithintensitymodulatedprotontherapyfortheshallowdepthtumor |