Cargando…

Evaluation of clinically applied treatment beams with respect to bunker shielding parameters for a Cyberknife M6

Compared to a conventional linear accelerator, the Cyberknife (CK) is a unique system with respect to radiation protection shielding and the variety and number of non‐coplanar beams are two key components regarding this aspect. In this work, a framework to assess the direction distribution and modul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henzen, Dominik, Schmidhalter, Daniel, Zanella, Claudia Christina, Volken, Werner, Mackeprang, Paul‐Henry, Malthaner, Marco, Fix, Michael Karl, Manser, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5768034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29125234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12215
_version_ 1783292638814797824
author Henzen, Dominik
Schmidhalter, Daniel
Zanella, Claudia Christina
Volken, Werner
Mackeprang, Paul‐Henry
Malthaner, Marco
Fix, Michael Karl
Manser, Peter
author_facet Henzen, Dominik
Schmidhalter, Daniel
Zanella, Claudia Christina
Volken, Werner
Mackeprang, Paul‐Henry
Malthaner, Marco
Fix, Michael Karl
Manser, Peter
author_sort Henzen, Dominik
collection PubMed
description Compared to a conventional linear accelerator, the Cyberknife (CK) is a unique system with respect to radiation protection shielding and the variety and number of non‐coplanar beams are two key components regarding this aspect. In this work, a framework to assess the direction distribution and modulation factor (MF) of clinically applied treatment beams of a CyberKnife M6 is developed. Database filtering options allow studying the influence of different parameters such as collimator types, treatment sites or different bunker sizes. A distribution of monitor units (MU) is generated by projecting treatment beams onto the walls, floor and ceiling of the CyberKnife bunker. This distribution is found to be highly heterogeneous and depending, among other parameters, on the bunker size. For our bunker design, 10%–13% of the MUs are delivered to the right and left wall, each. The floor receives more than 64% of the applied MUs, while the wall behind the patient's head is not hit by primary treatment beams. Between 0% and 5% of the total MUs are delivered to the wall at the patient's feet. This number highly depends on the treatment site, e.g., for extracranial patients no beams hit that wall. Collimator choice was found to have minor influence on the distribution of MUs. On the other hand, the MF depends on the collimator type as well as on the treatment site. The MFs (delivered MU/prescribed dose) for all treatments, all MLC treatments, cranial and extracranial treatments are 8.3, 6.4, 7.7, and 9.9 MU/cGy, respectively. The developed framework allows assessing and monitoring important parameters regarding radiation protection of a CK‐M6 using the actually applied treatment beams. Furthermore, it enables evaluating different clinical and constructional situations using the filtering options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5768034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57680342018-04-02 Evaluation of clinically applied treatment beams with respect to bunker shielding parameters for a Cyberknife M6 Henzen, Dominik Schmidhalter, Daniel Zanella, Claudia Christina Volken, Werner Mackeprang, Paul‐Henry Malthaner, Marco Fix, Michael Karl Manser, Peter J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Protection & Regulations Compared to a conventional linear accelerator, the Cyberknife (CK) is a unique system with respect to radiation protection shielding and the variety and number of non‐coplanar beams are two key components regarding this aspect. In this work, a framework to assess the direction distribution and modulation factor (MF) of clinically applied treatment beams of a CyberKnife M6 is developed. Database filtering options allow studying the influence of different parameters such as collimator types, treatment sites or different bunker sizes. A distribution of monitor units (MU) is generated by projecting treatment beams onto the walls, floor and ceiling of the CyberKnife bunker. This distribution is found to be highly heterogeneous and depending, among other parameters, on the bunker size. For our bunker design, 10%–13% of the MUs are delivered to the right and left wall, each. The floor receives more than 64% of the applied MUs, while the wall behind the patient's head is not hit by primary treatment beams. Between 0% and 5% of the total MUs are delivered to the wall at the patient's feet. This number highly depends on the treatment site, e.g., for extracranial patients no beams hit that wall. Collimator choice was found to have minor influence on the distribution of MUs. On the other hand, the MF depends on the collimator type as well as on the treatment site. The MFs (delivered MU/prescribed dose) for all treatments, all MLC treatments, cranial and extracranial treatments are 8.3, 6.4, 7.7, and 9.9 MU/cGy, respectively. The developed framework allows assessing and monitoring important parameters regarding radiation protection of a CK‐M6 using the actually applied treatment beams. Furthermore, it enables evaluating different clinical and constructional situations using the filtering options. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5768034/ /pubmed/29125234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12215 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Protection & Regulations
Henzen, Dominik
Schmidhalter, Daniel
Zanella, Claudia Christina
Volken, Werner
Mackeprang, Paul‐Henry
Malthaner, Marco
Fix, Michael Karl
Manser, Peter
Evaluation of clinically applied treatment beams with respect to bunker shielding parameters for a Cyberknife M6
title Evaluation of clinically applied treatment beams with respect to bunker shielding parameters for a Cyberknife M6
title_full Evaluation of clinically applied treatment beams with respect to bunker shielding parameters for a Cyberknife M6
title_fullStr Evaluation of clinically applied treatment beams with respect to bunker shielding parameters for a Cyberknife M6
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of clinically applied treatment beams with respect to bunker shielding parameters for a Cyberknife M6
title_short Evaluation of clinically applied treatment beams with respect to bunker shielding parameters for a Cyberknife M6
title_sort evaluation of clinically applied treatment beams with respect to bunker shielding parameters for a cyberknife m6
topic Radiation Protection & Regulations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5768034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29125234
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12215
work_keys_str_mv AT henzendominik evaluationofclinicallyappliedtreatmentbeamswithrespecttobunkershieldingparametersforacyberknifem6
AT schmidhalterdaniel evaluationofclinicallyappliedtreatmentbeamswithrespecttobunkershieldingparametersforacyberknifem6
AT zanellaclaudiachristina evaluationofclinicallyappliedtreatmentbeamswithrespecttobunkershieldingparametersforacyberknifem6
AT volkenwerner evaluationofclinicallyappliedtreatmentbeamswithrespecttobunkershieldingparametersforacyberknifem6
AT mackeprangpaulhenry evaluationofclinicallyappliedtreatmentbeamswithrespecttobunkershieldingparametersforacyberknifem6
AT malthanermarco evaluationofclinicallyappliedtreatmentbeamswithrespecttobunkershieldingparametersforacyberknifem6
AT fixmichaelkarl evaluationofclinicallyappliedtreatmentbeamswithrespecttobunkershieldingparametersforacyberknifem6
AT manserpeter evaluationofclinicallyappliedtreatmentbeamswithrespecttobunkershieldingparametersforacyberknifem6