Cargando…
Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in breast screening assessment cases and women with a family history of breast cancer
BACKGROUND: Mammographic density has been shown to be a strong independent predictor of breast cancer and a causative factor in reducing the sensitivity of mammography. There remain questions as to the use of mammographic density information in the context of screening and risk management, and of th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Science Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5768323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29190506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.10.022 |
_version_ | 1783292682088480768 |
---|---|
author | Duffy, Stephen W. Morrish, Oliver W.E. Allgood, Prue C. Black, Richard Gillan, Maureen G.C. Willsher, Paula Cooke, Julie Duncan, Karen A. Michell, Michael J. Dobson, Hilary M. Maroni, Roberta Lim, Yit Y. Purushothaman, Hema N. Suaris, Tamara Astley, Susan M. Young, Kenneth C. Tucker, Lorraine Gilbert, Fiona J. |
author_facet | Duffy, Stephen W. Morrish, Oliver W.E. Allgood, Prue C. Black, Richard Gillan, Maureen G.C. Willsher, Paula Cooke, Julie Duncan, Karen A. Michell, Michael J. Dobson, Hilary M. Maroni, Roberta Lim, Yit Y. Purushothaman, Hema N. Suaris, Tamara Astley, Susan M. Young, Kenneth C. Tucker, Lorraine Gilbert, Fiona J. |
author_sort | Duffy, Stephen W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mammographic density has been shown to be a strong independent predictor of breast cancer and a causative factor in reducing the sensitivity of mammography. There remain questions as to the use of mammographic density information in the context of screening and risk management, and of the association with cancer in populations known to be at increased risk of breast cancer. AIM: To assess the association of breast density with presence of cancer by measuring mammographic density visually as a percentage, and with two automated volumetric methods, Quantra™ and VolparaDensity™. METHODS: The TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY (TOMMY) study of digital breast tomosynthesis in the Breast Screening Programme of the National Health Service (NHS) of the United Kingdom (UK) included 6020 breast screening assessment cases (of whom 1158 had breast cancer) and 1040 screened women with a family history of breast cancer (of whom two had breast cancer). We assessed the association of each measure with breast cancer risk in these populations at enhanced risk, using logistic regression adjusted for age and total breast volume as a surrogate for body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: All density measures showed a positive association with presence of cancer and all declined with age. The strongest effect was seen with Volpara absolute density, with a significant 3% (95% CI 1–5%) increase in risk per 10 cm(3) of dense tissue. The effect of Volpara volumetric density on risk was stronger for large and grade 3 tumours. CONCLUSIONS: Automated absolute breast density is a predictor of breast cancer risk in populations at enhanced risk due to either positive mammographic findings or family history. In the screening context, density could be a trigger for more intensive imaging. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5768323 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier Science Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57683232018-01-22 Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in breast screening assessment cases and women with a family history of breast cancer Duffy, Stephen W. Morrish, Oliver W.E. Allgood, Prue C. Black, Richard Gillan, Maureen G.C. Willsher, Paula Cooke, Julie Duncan, Karen A. Michell, Michael J. Dobson, Hilary M. Maroni, Roberta Lim, Yit Y. Purushothaman, Hema N. Suaris, Tamara Astley, Susan M. Young, Kenneth C. Tucker, Lorraine Gilbert, Fiona J. Eur J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: Mammographic density has been shown to be a strong independent predictor of breast cancer and a causative factor in reducing the sensitivity of mammography. There remain questions as to the use of mammographic density information in the context of screening and risk management, and of the association with cancer in populations known to be at increased risk of breast cancer. AIM: To assess the association of breast density with presence of cancer by measuring mammographic density visually as a percentage, and with two automated volumetric methods, Quantra™ and VolparaDensity™. METHODS: The TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY (TOMMY) study of digital breast tomosynthesis in the Breast Screening Programme of the National Health Service (NHS) of the United Kingdom (UK) included 6020 breast screening assessment cases (of whom 1158 had breast cancer) and 1040 screened women with a family history of breast cancer (of whom two had breast cancer). We assessed the association of each measure with breast cancer risk in these populations at enhanced risk, using logistic regression adjusted for age and total breast volume as a surrogate for body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: All density measures showed a positive association with presence of cancer and all declined with age. The strongest effect was seen with Volpara absolute density, with a significant 3% (95% CI 1–5%) increase in risk per 10 cm(3) of dense tissue. The effect of Volpara volumetric density on risk was stronger for large and grade 3 tumours. CONCLUSIONS: Automated absolute breast density is a predictor of breast cancer risk in populations at enhanced risk due to either positive mammographic findings or family history. In the screening context, density could be a trigger for more intensive imaging. Elsevier Science Ltd 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5768323/ /pubmed/29190506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.10.022 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Duffy, Stephen W. Morrish, Oliver W.E. Allgood, Prue C. Black, Richard Gillan, Maureen G.C. Willsher, Paula Cooke, Julie Duncan, Karen A. Michell, Michael J. Dobson, Hilary M. Maroni, Roberta Lim, Yit Y. Purushothaman, Hema N. Suaris, Tamara Astley, Susan M. Young, Kenneth C. Tucker, Lorraine Gilbert, Fiona J. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in breast screening assessment cases and women with a family history of breast cancer |
title | Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in breast screening assessment cases and women with a family history of breast cancer |
title_full | Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in breast screening assessment cases and women with a family history of breast cancer |
title_fullStr | Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in breast screening assessment cases and women with a family history of breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in breast screening assessment cases and women with a family history of breast cancer |
title_short | Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in breast screening assessment cases and women with a family history of breast cancer |
title_sort | mammographic density and breast cancer risk in breast screening assessment cases and women with a family history of breast cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5768323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29190506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.10.022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duffystephenw mammographicdensityandbreastcancerriskinbreastscreeningassessmentcasesandwomenwithafamilyhistoryofbreastcancer AT morrisholiverwe mammographicdensityandbreastcancerriskinbreastscreeningassessmentcasesandwomenwithafamilyhistoryofbreastcancer AT allgoodpruec mammographicdensityandbreastcancerriskinbreastscreeningassessmentcasesandwomenwithafamilyhistoryofbreastcancer AT blackrichard mammographicdensityandbreastcancerriskinbreastscreeningassessmentcasesandwomenwithafamilyhistoryofbreastcancer AT gillanmaureengc mammographicdensityandbreastcancerriskinbreastscreeningassessmentcasesandwomenwithafamilyhistoryofbreastcancer AT willsherpaula mammographicdensityandbreastcancerriskinbreastscreeningassessmentcasesandwomenwithafamilyhistoryofbreastcancer AT cookejulie mammographicdensityandbreastcancerriskinbreastscreeningassessmentcasesandwomenwithafamilyhistoryofbreastcancer AT duncankarena mammographicdensityandbreastcancerriskinbreastscreeningassessmentcasesandwomenwithafamilyhistoryofbreastcancer AT michellmichaelj mammographicdensityandbreastcancerriskinbreastscreeningassessmentcasesandwomenwithafamilyhistoryofbreastcancer AT dobsonhilarym mammographicdensityandbreastcancerriskinbreastscreeningassessmentcasesandwomenwithafamilyhistoryofbreastcancer AT maroniroberta mammographicdensityandbreastcancerriskinbreastscreeningassessmentcasesandwomenwithafamilyhistoryofbreastcancer AT limyity mammographicdensityandbreastcancerriskinbreastscreeningassessmentcasesandwomenwithafamilyhistoryofbreastcancer AT purushothamanheman mammographicdensityandbreastcancerriskinbreastscreeningassessmentcasesandwomenwithafamilyhistoryofbreastcancer AT suaristamara mammographicdensityandbreastcancerriskinbreastscreeningassessmentcasesandwomenwithafamilyhistoryofbreastcancer AT astleysusanm mammographicdensityandbreastcancerriskinbreastscreeningassessmentcasesandwomenwithafamilyhistoryofbreastcancer AT youngkennethc mammographicdensityandbreastcancerriskinbreastscreeningassessmentcasesandwomenwithafamilyhistoryofbreastcancer AT tuckerlorraine mammographicdensityandbreastcancerriskinbreastscreeningassessmentcasesandwomenwithafamilyhistoryofbreastcancer AT gilbertfionaj mammographicdensityandbreastcancerriskinbreastscreeningassessmentcasesandwomenwithafamilyhistoryofbreastcancer |