Cargando…

Socioeconomic inequality in morbid obesity with body mass index more than 40 kg/m(2) in the United States and England

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated socioeconomic inequality in morbid obesity (body mass index, BMI ≥40 kg/m(2)) through an analysis of population health survey data in the United States (US) and England (UK). METHODS: We analysed data for the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Booth, Helen P., Charlton, Judith, Gulliford, Martin C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5769007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29349213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.12.012
_version_ 1783292818165334016
author Booth, Helen P.
Charlton, Judith
Gulliford, Martin C.
author_facet Booth, Helen P.
Charlton, Judith
Gulliford, Martin C.
author_sort Booth, Helen P.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated socioeconomic inequality in morbid obesity (body mass index, BMI ≥40 kg/m(2)) through an analysis of population health survey data in the United States (US) and England (UK). METHODS: We analysed data for the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the Health Survey for England for 2011 to 2014. Age-adjusted odds ratios (AOR) were used to evaluate income- and education-inequality. RESULTS: There were 26,898 eligible UK and 10,628 US participants. Morbid obesity was more frequent in women than men, and higher in the US than the UK (men: US, 4.8%; UK, 1.7%; women US, 9.6%; UK, 3.7%). In the UK, morbid obesity showed graded income-inequality in both genders (AOR, for lowest income quintile: men, 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 2.88; women, 2.18, 1.55 to 3.07), as well as education-inequality (AOR for no school qualifications, men 2.57, 1.64 to 4.02; women, 2.18, 1.55 to 3.07). In the US, morbid obesity showed a consistent gradient only for income in women (AOR for lowest income quintile 1.97, 1.19 to 3.25). When compared with all other US groups, having college education (AOR, men, 0.56, 0.29 to 1.08; women, 0.36, 0.22 to 0.60) or household income ≥$75 000 (AOR, men 0.52, 0.27 to 0.98; women, 0.51, 0.33 to 0.80) appeared to protect against morbid obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Morbid obesity is associated with lower socioeconomic status in men and women in the UK. In the US, morbid obesity was twice as prevalent, but less strongly associated with socioeconomic status, suggesting that morbid obesity may now have spread to all but the highest socioeconomic groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5769007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57690072018-01-18 Socioeconomic inequality in morbid obesity with body mass index more than 40 kg/m(2) in the United States and England Booth, Helen P. Charlton, Judith Gulliford, Martin C. SSM Popul Health Article INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated socioeconomic inequality in morbid obesity (body mass index, BMI ≥40 kg/m(2)) through an analysis of population health survey data in the United States (US) and England (UK). METHODS: We analysed data for the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the Health Survey for England for 2011 to 2014. Age-adjusted odds ratios (AOR) were used to evaluate income- and education-inequality. RESULTS: There were 26,898 eligible UK and 10,628 US participants. Morbid obesity was more frequent in women than men, and higher in the US than the UK (men: US, 4.8%; UK, 1.7%; women US, 9.6%; UK, 3.7%). In the UK, morbid obesity showed graded income-inequality in both genders (AOR, for lowest income quintile: men, 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 2.88; women, 2.18, 1.55 to 3.07), as well as education-inequality (AOR for no school qualifications, men 2.57, 1.64 to 4.02; women, 2.18, 1.55 to 3.07). In the US, morbid obesity showed a consistent gradient only for income in women (AOR for lowest income quintile 1.97, 1.19 to 3.25). When compared with all other US groups, having college education (AOR, men, 0.56, 0.29 to 1.08; women, 0.36, 0.22 to 0.60) or household income ≥$75 000 (AOR, men 0.52, 0.27 to 0.98; women, 0.51, 0.33 to 0.80) appeared to protect against morbid obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Morbid obesity is associated with lower socioeconomic status in men and women in the UK. In the US, morbid obesity was twice as prevalent, but less strongly associated with socioeconomic status, suggesting that morbid obesity may now have spread to all but the highest socioeconomic groups. Elsevier 2016-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5769007/ /pubmed/29349213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.12.012 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Booth, Helen P.
Charlton, Judith
Gulliford, Martin C.
Socioeconomic inequality in morbid obesity with body mass index more than 40 kg/m(2) in the United States and England
title Socioeconomic inequality in morbid obesity with body mass index more than 40 kg/m(2) in the United States and England
title_full Socioeconomic inequality in morbid obesity with body mass index more than 40 kg/m(2) in the United States and England
title_fullStr Socioeconomic inequality in morbid obesity with body mass index more than 40 kg/m(2) in the United States and England
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic inequality in morbid obesity with body mass index more than 40 kg/m(2) in the United States and England
title_short Socioeconomic inequality in morbid obesity with body mass index more than 40 kg/m(2) in the United States and England
title_sort socioeconomic inequality in morbid obesity with body mass index more than 40 kg/m(2) in the united states and england
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5769007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29349213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.12.012
work_keys_str_mv AT boothhelenp socioeconomicinequalityinmorbidobesitywithbodymassindexmorethan40kgm2intheunitedstatesandengland
AT charltonjudith socioeconomicinequalityinmorbidobesitywithbodymassindexmorethan40kgm2intheunitedstatesandengland
AT gullifordmartinc socioeconomicinequalityinmorbidobesitywithbodymassindexmorethan40kgm2intheunitedstatesandengland