Cargando…

The tyranny of the averages and the indiscriminate use of risk factors in public health: The case of coronary heart disease

Modern medicine is overwhelmed by a plethora of both established risk factors and novel biomarkers for diseases. The majority of this information is expressed by probabilistic measures of association such as the odds ratio (OR) obtained by calculating differences in average “risk” between exposed an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merlo, Juan, Mulinari, Shai, Wemrell, Maria, Subramanian, SV, Hedblad, Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5769103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29349257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.08.005
_version_ 1783292836319330304
author Merlo, Juan
Mulinari, Shai
Wemrell, Maria
Subramanian, SV
Hedblad, Bo
author_facet Merlo, Juan
Mulinari, Shai
Wemrell, Maria
Subramanian, SV
Hedblad, Bo
author_sort Merlo, Juan
collection PubMed
description Modern medicine is overwhelmed by a plethora of both established risk factors and novel biomarkers for diseases. The majority of this information is expressed by probabilistic measures of association such as the odds ratio (OR) obtained by calculating differences in average “risk” between exposed and unexposed groups. However, recent research demonstrates that even ORs of considerable magnitude are insufficient for assessing the ability of risk factors or biomarkers to distinguish the individuals who will develop the disease from those who will not. In regards to coronary heart disease (CHD), we already know that novel biomarkers add very little to the discriminatory accuracy (DA) of traditional risk factors. However, the value added by traditional risk factors alongside simple demographic variables such as age and sex has been the subject of less discussion. Moreover, in public health, we use the OR to calculate the population attributable fraction (PAF), although this measure fails to consider the DA of the risk factor it represents. Therefore, focusing on CHD and applying measures of DA, we re-examine the role of individual demographic characteristics, risk factors, novel biomarkers and PAFs in public health and epidemiology. In so doing, we also raise a more general criticism of the traditional risk factors’ epidemiology. We investigated a cohort of 6103 men and women who participated in the baseline (1991–1996) of the Malmö Diet and Cancer study and were followed for 18 years. We found that neither traditional risk factors nor biomarkers substantially improved the DA obtained by models considering only age and sex. We concluded that the PAF measure provided insufficient information for the planning of preventive strategies in the population. We need a better understanding of the individual heterogeneity around the averages and, thereby, a fundamental change in the way we interpret risk factors in public health and epidemiology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5769103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57691032018-01-18 The tyranny of the averages and the indiscriminate use of risk factors in public health: The case of coronary heart disease Merlo, Juan Mulinari, Shai Wemrell, Maria Subramanian, SV Hedblad, Bo SSM Popul Health Article Modern medicine is overwhelmed by a plethora of both established risk factors and novel biomarkers for diseases. The majority of this information is expressed by probabilistic measures of association such as the odds ratio (OR) obtained by calculating differences in average “risk” between exposed and unexposed groups. However, recent research demonstrates that even ORs of considerable magnitude are insufficient for assessing the ability of risk factors or biomarkers to distinguish the individuals who will develop the disease from those who will not. In regards to coronary heart disease (CHD), we already know that novel biomarkers add very little to the discriminatory accuracy (DA) of traditional risk factors. However, the value added by traditional risk factors alongside simple demographic variables such as age and sex has been the subject of less discussion. Moreover, in public health, we use the OR to calculate the population attributable fraction (PAF), although this measure fails to consider the DA of the risk factor it represents. Therefore, focusing on CHD and applying measures of DA, we re-examine the role of individual demographic characteristics, risk factors, novel biomarkers and PAFs in public health and epidemiology. In so doing, we also raise a more general criticism of the traditional risk factors’ epidemiology. We investigated a cohort of 6103 men and women who participated in the baseline (1991–1996) of the Malmö Diet and Cancer study and were followed for 18 years. We found that neither traditional risk factors nor biomarkers substantially improved the DA obtained by models considering only age and sex. We concluded that the PAF measure provided insufficient information for the planning of preventive strategies in the population. We need a better understanding of the individual heterogeneity around the averages and, thereby, a fundamental change in the way we interpret risk factors in public health and epidemiology. Elsevier 2017-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5769103/ /pubmed/29349257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.08.005 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Merlo, Juan
Mulinari, Shai
Wemrell, Maria
Subramanian, SV
Hedblad, Bo
The tyranny of the averages and the indiscriminate use of risk factors in public health: The case of coronary heart disease
title The tyranny of the averages and the indiscriminate use of risk factors in public health: The case of coronary heart disease
title_full The tyranny of the averages and the indiscriminate use of risk factors in public health: The case of coronary heart disease
title_fullStr The tyranny of the averages and the indiscriminate use of risk factors in public health: The case of coronary heart disease
title_full_unstemmed The tyranny of the averages and the indiscriminate use of risk factors in public health: The case of coronary heart disease
title_short The tyranny of the averages and the indiscriminate use of risk factors in public health: The case of coronary heart disease
title_sort tyranny of the averages and the indiscriminate use of risk factors in public health: the case of coronary heart disease
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5769103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29349257
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.08.005
work_keys_str_mv AT merlojuan thetyrannyoftheaveragesandtheindiscriminateuseofriskfactorsinpublichealththecaseofcoronaryheartdisease
AT mulinarishai thetyrannyoftheaveragesandtheindiscriminateuseofriskfactorsinpublichealththecaseofcoronaryheartdisease
AT wemrellmaria thetyrannyoftheaveragesandtheindiscriminateuseofriskfactorsinpublichealththecaseofcoronaryheartdisease
AT subramaniansv thetyrannyoftheaveragesandtheindiscriminateuseofriskfactorsinpublichealththecaseofcoronaryheartdisease
AT hedbladbo thetyrannyoftheaveragesandtheindiscriminateuseofriskfactorsinpublichealththecaseofcoronaryheartdisease
AT merlojuan tyrannyoftheaveragesandtheindiscriminateuseofriskfactorsinpublichealththecaseofcoronaryheartdisease
AT mulinarishai tyrannyoftheaveragesandtheindiscriminateuseofriskfactorsinpublichealththecaseofcoronaryheartdisease
AT wemrellmaria tyrannyoftheaveragesandtheindiscriminateuseofriskfactorsinpublichealththecaseofcoronaryheartdisease
AT subramaniansv tyrannyoftheaveragesandtheindiscriminateuseofriskfactorsinpublichealththecaseofcoronaryheartdisease
AT hedbladbo tyrannyoftheaveragesandtheindiscriminateuseofriskfactorsinpublichealththecaseofcoronaryheartdisease