Cargando…

Low birthweight in rural Cameroon: an analysis of a cut-off value

BACKGROUND: Low birthweight (LBW) is a major predictor of early neonatal mortality which disproportionately affects low-income countries. WHO recommends regional definitions for LBW to prevent misclassifications and ensure appropriate care of babies with LBW. We conducted this study to define a clin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agbor, Valirie Ndip, Ditah, Chobufo, Tochie, Joel Noutakdie, Njim, Tsi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5769287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29334919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1663-y
_version_ 1783292870653902848
author Agbor, Valirie Ndip
Ditah, Chobufo
Tochie, Joel Noutakdie
Njim, Tsi
author_facet Agbor, Valirie Ndip
Ditah, Chobufo
Tochie, Joel Noutakdie
Njim, Tsi
author_sort Agbor, Valirie Ndip
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Low birthweight (LBW) is a major predictor of early neonatal mortality which disproportionately affects low-income countries. WHO recommends regional definitions for LBW to prevent misclassifications and ensure appropriate care of babies with LBW. We conducted this study to define a clinical cut-off for LBW, and to determine the predictors and adverse foetal outcomes of LBW babies in a rural sub-division in Cameroon. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective register analysis of 1787 singleton deliveries in two health facilities in the Northwest Region of Cameroon. Records with no birthweight or birthweight less than 1000 g, babies born before arrival, multiple deliveries and deliveries before 28 weeks gestation were excluded from this study. The 10th percentile of birthweights was computed to obtain a statistical cut-off value for the LBW. To assess the clinical significance of the newly defined cut-off value, we compared the prevalence of adverse foetal outcomes between LBW (birthweight <10th percentile) and heavier babies (birthweight ≥10th percentile) in our study population. RESULTS: The 10th percentile of the birthweights was 2700 g. Preterm delivery was the lone predictor of LBW (aOR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.3–3.1; p = 0.001). LBW babies were more likely to be stillborn (OR = 9.6; 95% CI = 4.2–21.6; p < 0.001) or asphyxiated at the 5th minute (OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.2–3.3; p = 0.006), compared with heavier babies. Also, 6.1% of babies who had a birthweight between 2500 and 2700 g were more likely to be stillborn compared to heavier babies. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the clinical cut-off for LBW in this rural community is 2700 g; with 6.1% of babies born with LBW probably receiving inadequate care as the traditional cut-off value of 2500 g proposed by WHO is still used to define LBW in our setting. Further studies are necessary to define a national cut-off value for harmonisation of LBW definitions in the country to prevent misclassifications and ensure appropriate neonatal care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5769287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57692872018-01-25 Low birthweight in rural Cameroon: an analysis of a cut-off value Agbor, Valirie Ndip Ditah, Chobufo Tochie, Joel Noutakdie Njim, Tsi BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Low birthweight (LBW) is a major predictor of early neonatal mortality which disproportionately affects low-income countries. WHO recommends regional definitions for LBW to prevent misclassifications and ensure appropriate care of babies with LBW. We conducted this study to define a clinical cut-off for LBW, and to determine the predictors and adverse foetal outcomes of LBW babies in a rural sub-division in Cameroon. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective register analysis of 1787 singleton deliveries in two health facilities in the Northwest Region of Cameroon. Records with no birthweight or birthweight less than 1000 g, babies born before arrival, multiple deliveries and deliveries before 28 weeks gestation were excluded from this study. The 10th percentile of birthweights was computed to obtain a statistical cut-off value for the LBW. To assess the clinical significance of the newly defined cut-off value, we compared the prevalence of adverse foetal outcomes between LBW (birthweight <10th percentile) and heavier babies (birthweight ≥10th percentile) in our study population. RESULTS: The 10th percentile of the birthweights was 2700 g. Preterm delivery was the lone predictor of LBW (aOR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.3–3.1; p = 0.001). LBW babies were more likely to be stillborn (OR = 9.6; 95% CI = 4.2–21.6; p < 0.001) or asphyxiated at the 5th minute (OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.2–3.3; p = 0.006), compared with heavier babies. Also, 6.1% of babies who had a birthweight between 2500 and 2700 g were more likely to be stillborn compared to heavier babies. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the clinical cut-off for LBW in this rural community is 2700 g; with 6.1% of babies born with LBW probably receiving inadequate care as the traditional cut-off value of 2500 g proposed by WHO is still used to define LBW in our setting. Further studies are necessary to define a national cut-off value for harmonisation of LBW definitions in the country to prevent misclassifications and ensure appropriate neonatal care. BioMed Central 2018-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5769287/ /pubmed/29334919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1663-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Agbor, Valirie Ndip
Ditah, Chobufo
Tochie, Joel Noutakdie
Njim, Tsi
Low birthweight in rural Cameroon: an analysis of a cut-off value
title Low birthweight in rural Cameroon: an analysis of a cut-off value
title_full Low birthweight in rural Cameroon: an analysis of a cut-off value
title_fullStr Low birthweight in rural Cameroon: an analysis of a cut-off value
title_full_unstemmed Low birthweight in rural Cameroon: an analysis of a cut-off value
title_short Low birthweight in rural Cameroon: an analysis of a cut-off value
title_sort low birthweight in rural cameroon: an analysis of a cut-off value
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5769287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29334919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1663-y
work_keys_str_mv AT agborvaliriendip lowbirthweightinruralcameroonananalysisofacutoffvalue
AT ditahchobufo lowbirthweightinruralcameroonananalysisofacutoffvalue
AT tochiejoelnoutakdie lowbirthweightinruralcameroonananalysisofacutoffvalue
AT njimtsi lowbirthweightinruralcameroonananalysisofacutoffvalue