Cargando…

Carbonyl Emissions in E-cigarette Aerosol: A Systematic Review and Methodological Considerations

Carbonyl emissions from tobacco cigarettes represent a substantial health risk contributing to smoking-related morbidity and mortality. As expected, this is an important research topic for tobacco harm reduction products, in an attempt to compare the relative risk of these products compared to tobac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farsalinos, Konstantinos E., Gillman, Gene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5769337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375395
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.01119
_version_ 1783292880105766912
author Farsalinos, Konstantinos E.
Gillman, Gene
author_facet Farsalinos, Konstantinos E.
Gillman, Gene
author_sort Farsalinos, Konstantinos E.
collection PubMed
description Carbonyl emissions from tobacco cigarettes represent a substantial health risk contributing to smoking-related morbidity and mortality. As expected, this is an important research topic for tobacco harm reduction products, in an attempt to compare the relative risk of these products compared to tobacco cigarettes. In this study, a systematic review of the literature available on PubMed was performed analyzing the studies evaluating carbonyl emissions from e-cigarettes. A total of 32 studies were identified and presented. We identified a large diversity of methodologies, with substantial discrepancies in puffing patterns, aerosol collection and analytical methods as well as reported units of measurements. Such discrepancies make comparisons difficult, and in some cases the accuracy of the findings cannot be determined. Importantly, control for the generation of dry puffs was not performed in the vast majority of studies, particularly in studies using variable power devices, which could result in testing conditions and reported carbonyl levels that have no clinical relevance or context. Some studies have been replicated, verifying the presence of dry puff conditions. Whenever realistic use conditions were ensured, carbonyl emissions from e-cigarettes were substantially lower than tobacco cigarette smoke, while newer generation (bottom-coil, cotton wick) atomizers appeared to emit minimal levels of carbonyls with questionable clinical significance in terms of health risk. However, extremely high levels of carbonyl emissions were reported in some studies, and all these studies need to be replicated because of potentially important health implications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5769337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57693372018-01-26 Carbonyl Emissions in E-cigarette Aerosol: A Systematic Review and Methodological Considerations Farsalinos, Konstantinos E. Gillman, Gene Front Physiol Physiology Carbonyl emissions from tobacco cigarettes represent a substantial health risk contributing to smoking-related morbidity and mortality. As expected, this is an important research topic for tobacco harm reduction products, in an attempt to compare the relative risk of these products compared to tobacco cigarettes. In this study, a systematic review of the literature available on PubMed was performed analyzing the studies evaluating carbonyl emissions from e-cigarettes. A total of 32 studies were identified and presented. We identified a large diversity of methodologies, with substantial discrepancies in puffing patterns, aerosol collection and analytical methods as well as reported units of measurements. Such discrepancies make comparisons difficult, and in some cases the accuracy of the findings cannot be determined. Importantly, control for the generation of dry puffs was not performed in the vast majority of studies, particularly in studies using variable power devices, which could result in testing conditions and reported carbonyl levels that have no clinical relevance or context. Some studies have been replicated, verifying the presence of dry puff conditions. Whenever realistic use conditions were ensured, carbonyl emissions from e-cigarettes were substantially lower than tobacco cigarette smoke, while newer generation (bottom-coil, cotton wick) atomizers appeared to emit minimal levels of carbonyls with questionable clinical significance in terms of health risk. However, extremely high levels of carbonyl emissions were reported in some studies, and all these studies need to be replicated because of potentially important health implications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5769337/ /pubmed/29375395 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.01119 Text en Copyright © 2018 Farsalinos and Gillman. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Farsalinos, Konstantinos E.
Gillman, Gene
Carbonyl Emissions in E-cigarette Aerosol: A Systematic Review and Methodological Considerations
title Carbonyl Emissions in E-cigarette Aerosol: A Systematic Review and Methodological Considerations
title_full Carbonyl Emissions in E-cigarette Aerosol: A Systematic Review and Methodological Considerations
title_fullStr Carbonyl Emissions in E-cigarette Aerosol: A Systematic Review and Methodological Considerations
title_full_unstemmed Carbonyl Emissions in E-cigarette Aerosol: A Systematic Review and Methodological Considerations
title_short Carbonyl Emissions in E-cigarette Aerosol: A Systematic Review and Methodological Considerations
title_sort carbonyl emissions in e-cigarette aerosol: a systematic review and methodological considerations
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5769337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375395
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.01119
work_keys_str_mv AT farsalinoskonstantinose carbonylemissionsinecigaretteaerosolasystematicreviewandmethodologicalconsiderations
AT gillmangene carbonylemissionsinecigaretteaerosolasystematicreviewandmethodologicalconsiderations