Cargando…

Barriers and facilitators to cultural competence in rehabilitation services: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: There is an important need to evaluate whether rehabilitation services effectively address the needs of minority culture populations with North America’s increasingly diverse population. The objective of this paper was therefore to review and assess the state of knowledge of barriers and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grandpierre, Viviane, Milloy, Victoria, Sikora, Lindsey, Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth, Thomas, Roanne, Potter, Beth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5769395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29334968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2811-1
_version_ 1783292890937556992
author Grandpierre, Viviane
Milloy, Victoria
Sikora, Lindsey
Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth
Thomas, Roanne
Potter, Beth
author_facet Grandpierre, Viviane
Milloy, Victoria
Sikora, Lindsey
Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth
Thomas, Roanne
Potter, Beth
author_sort Grandpierre, Viviane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is an important need to evaluate whether rehabilitation services effectively address the needs of minority culture populations with North America’s increasingly diverse population. The objective of this paper was therefore to review and assess the state of knowledge of barriers and facilitators to cultural competence in rehabilitation services. METHOD: Our scoping review focused on cultural competence in rehabilitation services. Rehabilitation services included in this review were: audiology, speech-language pathology, physiotherapy, and occupational therapy. A search strategy was developed to identify relevant articles published from inception of databases until April 2015. Titles and abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers according to specific eligibility criteria with the use of a liberal-accelerated approach. Full-text articles meeting inclusion criteria were then screened. Key study characteristics were abstracted by the first reviewer, and findings were verified by the second reviewer. RESULTS: After duplicates were removed, 4303 citations were screened. Included articles suggest that studies on cultural competence occur most frequently in occupational therapy (n = 17), followed by speech language pathology (n = 11), physiotherapy (n = 6), and finally audiology (n = 1). Primary barriers in rehabilitation services include language barriers, limited resources, and cultural barriers. Primary facilitators include cultural awareness amongst practitioners, cultural awareness in services, and explanations of health care systems. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this review is the first to summarize barriers and facilitators to cultural competence in rehabilitation fields. Insufficient studies were found to draw any conclusions with regards to audiological services. Minimal perspectives based on patient/caregiver experiences in all rehabilitation fields underscore a research gap. Future studies should aim to explore both patient/caregiver and practitioner perspectives as such data can help inform culturally competent practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5769395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57693952018-01-25 Barriers and facilitators to cultural competence in rehabilitation services: a scoping review Grandpierre, Viviane Milloy, Victoria Sikora, Lindsey Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth Thomas, Roanne Potter, Beth BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: There is an important need to evaluate whether rehabilitation services effectively address the needs of minority culture populations with North America’s increasingly diverse population. The objective of this paper was therefore to review and assess the state of knowledge of barriers and facilitators to cultural competence in rehabilitation services. METHOD: Our scoping review focused on cultural competence in rehabilitation services. Rehabilitation services included in this review were: audiology, speech-language pathology, physiotherapy, and occupational therapy. A search strategy was developed to identify relevant articles published from inception of databases until April 2015. Titles and abstracts were screened by two independent reviewers according to specific eligibility criteria with the use of a liberal-accelerated approach. Full-text articles meeting inclusion criteria were then screened. Key study characteristics were abstracted by the first reviewer, and findings were verified by the second reviewer. RESULTS: After duplicates were removed, 4303 citations were screened. Included articles suggest that studies on cultural competence occur most frequently in occupational therapy (n = 17), followed by speech language pathology (n = 11), physiotherapy (n = 6), and finally audiology (n = 1). Primary barriers in rehabilitation services include language barriers, limited resources, and cultural barriers. Primary facilitators include cultural awareness amongst practitioners, cultural awareness in services, and explanations of health care systems. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this review is the first to summarize barriers and facilitators to cultural competence in rehabilitation fields. Insufficient studies were found to draw any conclusions with regards to audiological services. Minimal perspectives based on patient/caregiver experiences in all rehabilitation fields underscore a research gap. Future studies should aim to explore both patient/caregiver and practitioner perspectives as such data can help inform culturally competent practices. BioMed Central 2018-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5769395/ /pubmed/29334968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2811-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grandpierre, Viviane
Milloy, Victoria
Sikora, Lindsey
Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth
Thomas, Roanne
Potter, Beth
Barriers and facilitators to cultural competence in rehabilitation services: a scoping review
title Barriers and facilitators to cultural competence in rehabilitation services: a scoping review
title_full Barriers and facilitators to cultural competence in rehabilitation services: a scoping review
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators to cultural competence in rehabilitation services: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators to cultural competence in rehabilitation services: a scoping review
title_short Barriers and facilitators to cultural competence in rehabilitation services: a scoping review
title_sort barriers and facilitators to cultural competence in rehabilitation services: a scoping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5769395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29334968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2811-1
work_keys_str_mv AT grandpierreviviane barriersandfacilitatorstoculturalcompetenceinrehabilitationservicesascopingreview
AT milloyvictoria barriersandfacilitatorstoculturalcompetenceinrehabilitationservicesascopingreview
AT sikoralindsey barriersandfacilitatorstoculturalcompetenceinrehabilitationservicesascopingreview
AT fitzpatrickelizabeth barriersandfacilitatorstoculturalcompetenceinrehabilitationservicesascopingreview
AT thomasroanne barriersandfacilitatorstoculturalcompetenceinrehabilitationservicesascopingreview
AT potterbeth barriersandfacilitatorstoculturalcompetenceinrehabilitationservicesascopingreview