Cargando…

Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure: Revisiting Factors Influencing Optic Nerve Head Biomechanics

PURPOSE: To model the sensitivity of the optic nerve head (ONH) biomechanical environment to acute variations in IOP, cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP), and central retinal artery blood pressure (BP). METHODS: We extended a previously published numerical model of the ONH to include 24 factors repr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hua, Yi, Voorhees, Andrew P., Sigal, Ian A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5769499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29332130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-22488
_version_ 1783292906520444928
author Hua, Yi
Voorhees, Andrew P.
Sigal, Ian A.
author_facet Hua, Yi
Voorhees, Andrew P.
Sigal, Ian A.
author_sort Hua, Yi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To model the sensitivity of the optic nerve head (ONH) biomechanical environment to acute variations in IOP, cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP), and central retinal artery blood pressure (BP). METHODS: We extended a previously published numerical model of the ONH to include 24 factors representing tissue anatomy and mechanical properties, all three pressures, and constraints on the optic nerve (CON). A total of 8340 models were studied to predict factor influences on 98 responses in a two-step process: a fractional factorial screening analysis to identify the 16 most influential factors, followed by a response surface methodology to predict factor effects in detail. RESULTS: The six most influential factors were, in order: IOP, CON, moduli of the sclera, lamina cribrosa (LC) and dura, and CSFP. IOP and CSFP affected different aspects of ONH biomechanics. The strongest influence of CSFP, more than twice that of IOP, was on the rotation of the peripapillary sclera. CSFP had similar influence on LC stretch and compression to moduli of sclera and LC. On some ONHs, CSFP caused large retrolamina deformations and subarachnoid expansion. CON had a strong influence on LC displacement. BP overall influence was 633 times smaller than that of IOP. CONCLUSIONS: Models predict that IOP and CSFP are the top and sixth most influential factors on ONH biomechanics. Different IOP and CSFP effects suggest that translaminar pressure difference may not be a good parameter to predict biomechanics-related glaucomatous neuropathy. CON may drastically affect the responses relating to gross ONH geometry and should be determined experimentally.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5769499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57694992018-01-19 Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure: Revisiting Factors Influencing Optic Nerve Head Biomechanics Hua, Yi Voorhees, Andrew P. Sigal, Ian A. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Glaucoma PURPOSE: To model the sensitivity of the optic nerve head (ONH) biomechanical environment to acute variations in IOP, cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP), and central retinal artery blood pressure (BP). METHODS: We extended a previously published numerical model of the ONH to include 24 factors representing tissue anatomy and mechanical properties, all three pressures, and constraints on the optic nerve (CON). A total of 8340 models were studied to predict factor influences on 98 responses in a two-step process: a fractional factorial screening analysis to identify the 16 most influential factors, followed by a response surface methodology to predict factor effects in detail. RESULTS: The six most influential factors were, in order: IOP, CON, moduli of the sclera, lamina cribrosa (LC) and dura, and CSFP. IOP and CSFP affected different aspects of ONH biomechanics. The strongest influence of CSFP, more than twice that of IOP, was on the rotation of the peripapillary sclera. CSFP had similar influence on LC stretch and compression to moduli of sclera and LC. On some ONHs, CSFP caused large retrolamina deformations and subarachnoid expansion. CON had a strong influence on LC displacement. BP overall influence was 633 times smaller than that of IOP. CONCLUSIONS: Models predict that IOP and CSFP are the top and sixth most influential factors on ONH biomechanics. Different IOP and CSFP effects suggest that translaminar pressure difference may not be a good parameter to predict biomechanics-related glaucomatous neuropathy. CON may drastically affect the responses relating to gross ONH geometry and should be determined experimentally. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5769499/ /pubmed/29332130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-22488 Text en Copyright 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Glaucoma
Hua, Yi
Voorhees, Andrew P.
Sigal, Ian A.
Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure: Revisiting Factors Influencing Optic Nerve Head Biomechanics
title Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure: Revisiting Factors Influencing Optic Nerve Head Biomechanics
title_full Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure: Revisiting Factors Influencing Optic Nerve Head Biomechanics
title_fullStr Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure: Revisiting Factors Influencing Optic Nerve Head Biomechanics
title_full_unstemmed Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure: Revisiting Factors Influencing Optic Nerve Head Biomechanics
title_short Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure: Revisiting Factors Influencing Optic Nerve Head Biomechanics
title_sort cerebrospinal fluid pressure: revisiting factors influencing optic nerve head biomechanics
topic Glaucoma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5769499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29332130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-22488
work_keys_str_mv AT huayi cerebrospinalfluidpressurerevisitingfactorsinfluencingopticnerveheadbiomechanics
AT voorheesandrewp cerebrospinalfluidpressurerevisitingfactorsinfluencingopticnerveheadbiomechanics
AT sigaliana cerebrospinalfluidpressurerevisitingfactorsinfluencingopticnerveheadbiomechanics