Cargando…

Compare the Intracranial Pressure Trend after the Decompressive Craniectomy between Massive Intracerebral Hemorrhagic and Major Ischemic Stroke Patients

OBJECTIVE: Massive intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and major infarction (MI) are devastating cerebral vascular diseases. Decompression craniectomy (DC) is a common treatment approach for these diseases and acceptable clinical results have been reported. Author experienced the postoperative intracrana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huh, Joon, Yang, Seo-Yeon, Huh, Han-Yong, Ahn, Jae-Kun, Cho, Kwang-Wook, Kim, Young-Woo, Kim, Sung-Lim, Kim, Jong-Tae, Yoo, Do-Sung, Park, Hae-Kwan, Ji, Cheol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Neurosurgical Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5769847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354235
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2017.0224
_version_ 1783292974838317056
author Huh, Joon
Yang, Seo-Yeon
Huh, Han-Yong
Ahn, Jae-Kun
Cho, Kwang-Wook
Kim, Young-Woo
Kim, Sung-Lim
Kim, Jong-Tae
Yoo, Do-Sung
Park, Hae-Kwan
Ji, Cheol
author_facet Huh, Joon
Yang, Seo-Yeon
Huh, Han-Yong
Ahn, Jae-Kun
Cho, Kwang-Wook
Kim, Young-Woo
Kim, Sung-Lim
Kim, Jong-Tae
Yoo, Do-Sung
Park, Hae-Kwan
Ji, Cheol
author_sort Huh, Joon
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Massive intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and major infarction (MI) are devastating cerebral vascular diseases. Decompression craniectomy (DC) is a common treatment approach for these diseases and acceptable clinical results have been reported. Author experienced the postoperative intracranaial pressure (ICP) trend is somewhat different between the ICH and MI patients. In this study, we compare the ICP trend following DC and evaluate the clinical significance. METHODS: One hundred forty-three patients who underwent DC following massive ICH (81 cases) or MI (62 cases) were analyzed retrospectively. The mean age was 56.3±14.3 (median=57, male : female=89 : 54). DC was applied using consistent criteria in both diseases patients; Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score less than 8 and a midline shift more than 6 mm on brain computed tomography. In all patients, ventricular puncture was done before the DC and ICP trends were monitored during and after the surgery. Outcome comparisons included the ictus to operation time (OP-time), postoperative ICP trend, favorable outcomes and mortality. RESULTS: Initial GCS (p=0.364) and initial ventricular ICP (p=0.783) were similar among the ICH and MI patients. The postoperative ICP of ICH patients were drop rapidly and maintained within physiological range if greater than 80% of the hematoma was removed. While in MI patients, the postoperative ICP were not drop rapidly and maintained above the physiologic range (MI=18.8 vs. ICH=13.6 mmHg, p=0.000). The OP-times were faster in ICH patients (ICH=7.3 vs. MI=40.9 hours, p=0.000) and the mortality rate was higher in MI patients (MI=37.1% vs. ICH=17.3%, p=0.007). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that if greater than 80% of the hematoma was removed in ICH patients, the postoperative ICP rarely over the physiologic range. But in MI patients, the postoperative ICP was above the physiologic range for several days after the DC. Authors propose that DC is no need for the massive ICH patient if a significant portion of their hematoma is removed. But DC might be essential to improve the MI patients’ outcome and timely treatment decision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5769847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Neurosurgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57698472018-01-19 Compare the Intracranial Pressure Trend after the Decompressive Craniectomy between Massive Intracerebral Hemorrhagic and Major Ischemic Stroke Patients Huh, Joon Yang, Seo-Yeon Huh, Han-Yong Ahn, Jae-Kun Cho, Kwang-Wook Kim, Young-Woo Kim, Sung-Lim Kim, Jong-Tae Yoo, Do-Sung Park, Hae-Kwan Ji, Cheol J Korean Neurosurg Soc Clinical Article OBJECTIVE: Massive intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and major infarction (MI) are devastating cerebral vascular diseases. Decompression craniectomy (DC) is a common treatment approach for these diseases and acceptable clinical results have been reported. Author experienced the postoperative intracranaial pressure (ICP) trend is somewhat different between the ICH and MI patients. In this study, we compare the ICP trend following DC and evaluate the clinical significance. METHODS: One hundred forty-three patients who underwent DC following massive ICH (81 cases) or MI (62 cases) were analyzed retrospectively. The mean age was 56.3±14.3 (median=57, male : female=89 : 54). DC was applied using consistent criteria in both diseases patients; Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score less than 8 and a midline shift more than 6 mm on brain computed tomography. In all patients, ventricular puncture was done before the DC and ICP trends were monitored during and after the surgery. Outcome comparisons included the ictus to operation time (OP-time), postoperative ICP trend, favorable outcomes and mortality. RESULTS: Initial GCS (p=0.364) and initial ventricular ICP (p=0.783) were similar among the ICH and MI patients. The postoperative ICP of ICH patients were drop rapidly and maintained within physiological range if greater than 80% of the hematoma was removed. While in MI patients, the postoperative ICP were not drop rapidly and maintained above the physiologic range (MI=18.8 vs. ICH=13.6 mmHg, p=0.000). The OP-times were faster in ICH patients (ICH=7.3 vs. MI=40.9 hours, p=0.000) and the mortality rate was higher in MI patients (MI=37.1% vs. ICH=17.3%, p=0.007). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that if greater than 80% of the hematoma was removed in ICH patients, the postoperative ICP rarely over the physiologic range. But in MI patients, the postoperative ICP was above the physiologic range for several days after the DC. Authors propose that DC is no need for the massive ICH patient if a significant portion of their hematoma is removed. But DC might be essential to improve the MI patients’ outcome and timely treatment decision. Korean Neurosurgical Society 2018-01 2017-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5769847/ /pubmed/29354235 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2017.0224 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Korean Neurosurgical Society This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Article
Huh, Joon
Yang, Seo-Yeon
Huh, Han-Yong
Ahn, Jae-Kun
Cho, Kwang-Wook
Kim, Young-Woo
Kim, Sung-Lim
Kim, Jong-Tae
Yoo, Do-Sung
Park, Hae-Kwan
Ji, Cheol
Compare the Intracranial Pressure Trend after the Decompressive Craniectomy between Massive Intracerebral Hemorrhagic and Major Ischemic Stroke Patients
title Compare the Intracranial Pressure Trend after the Decompressive Craniectomy between Massive Intracerebral Hemorrhagic and Major Ischemic Stroke Patients
title_full Compare the Intracranial Pressure Trend after the Decompressive Craniectomy between Massive Intracerebral Hemorrhagic and Major Ischemic Stroke Patients
title_fullStr Compare the Intracranial Pressure Trend after the Decompressive Craniectomy between Massive Intracerebral Hemorrhagic and Major Ischemic Stroke Patients
title_full_unstemmed Compare the Intracranial Pressure Trend after the Decompressive Craniectomy between Massive Intracerebral Hemorrhagic and Major Ischemic Stroke Patients
title_short Compare the Intracranial Pressure Trend after the Decompressive Craniectomy between Massive Intracerebral Hemorrhagic and Major Ischemic Stroke Patients
title_sort compare the intracranial pressure trend after the decompressive craniectomy between massive intracerebral hemorrhagic and major ischemic stroke patients
topic Clinical Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5769847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29354235
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2017.0224
work_keys_str_mv AT huhjoon comparetheintracranialpressuretrendafterthedecompressivecraniectomybetweenmassiveintracerebralhemorrhagicandmajorischemicstrokepatients
AT yangseoyeon comparetheintracranialpressuretrendafterthedecompressivecraniectomybetweenmassiveintracerebralhemorrhagicandmajorischemicstrokepatients
AT huhhanyong comparetheintracranialpressuretrendafterthedecompressivecraniectomybetweenmassiveintracerebralhemorrhagicandmajorischemicstrokepatients
AT ahnjaekun comparetheintracranialpressuretrendafterthedecompressivecraniectomybetweenmassiveintracerebralhemorrhagicandmajorischemicstrokepatients
AT chokwangwook comparetheintracranialpressuretrendafterthedecompressivecraniectomybetweenmassiveintracerebralhemorrhagicandmajorischemicstrokepatients
AT kimyoungwoo comparetheintracranialpressuretrendafterthedecompressivecraniectomybetweenmassiveintracerebralhemorrhagicandmajorischemicstrokepatients
AT kimsunglim comparetheintracranialpressuretrendafterthedecompressivecraniectomybetweenmassiveintracerebralhemorrhagicandmajorischemicstrokepatients
AT kimjongtae comparetheintracranialpressuretrendafterthedecompressivecraniectomybetweenmassiveintracerebralhemorrhagicandmajorischemicstrokepatients
AT yoodosung comparetheintracranialpressuretrendafterthedecompressivecraniectomybetweenmassiveintracerebralhemorrhagicandmajorischemicstrokepatients
AT parkhaekwan comparetheintracranialpressuretrendafterthedecompressivecraniectomybetweenmassiveintracerebralhemorrhagicandmajorischemicstrokepatients
AT jicheol comparetheintracranialpressuretrendafterthedecompressivecraniectomybetweenmassiveintracerebralhemorrhagicandmajorischemicstrokepatients