Cargando…

Comparison between 3-dimensional cranial ultrasonography and conventional 2-dimensional cranial ultrasonography in neonates: impact on reinterpretation

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate impact of 3-dimensional cranial ultrasonography (3DUS) on reinterpretation of cranial ultrasonography images in neonates in comparison with 2-dimensional cranial ultrasonography (2DUS). METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 50 young infants who simultane...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Yu Jin, Choi, Young Hun, Cho, Hyun Hae, Lee, So Mi, Park, Ji Eun, Cheon, Jung-Eun, Kim, Woo Sun, Kim, In-One
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5769951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28780784
http://dx.doi.org/10.14366/usg.17009
_version_ 1783292993575321600
author Kim, Yu Jin
Choi, Young Hun
Cho, Hyun Hae
Lee, So Mi
Park, Ji Eun
Cheon, Jung-Eun
Kim, Woo Sun
Kim, In-One
author_facet Kim, Yu Jin
Choi, Young Hun
Cho, Hyun Hae
Lee, So Mi
Park, Ji Eun
Cheon, Jung-Eun
Kim, Woo Sun
Kim, In-One
author_sort Kim, Yu Jin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate impact of 3-dimensional cranial ultrasonography (3DUS) on reinterpretation of cranial ultrasonography images in neonates in comparison with 2-dimensional cranial ultrasonography (2DUS). METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 50 young infants who simultaneously underwent both 2DUS and 3DUS scanning from February to March 2015. Two pediatric radiologists independently reviewed both scans for overall image quality on a 5-point scale. Five features were evaluated in both scans: the presence of germinal matrix hemorrhage (GMH), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), ventriculomegaly (VM), abnormality of periventricular echogenicity (PVE), and focal parenchymal lesions (FL). The concordance rate between the two scanning modes was calculated. The confidence level for each finding on a 3-point scale and the scanning time were compared between the two scanning modes. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using kappa statistics. RESULTS: Both scans demonstrated similar overall image quality in terms of reinterpretation (mean scores for 2DUS and 3DUS, 4.0±0.5 and 4.0±0.7 in reviewer 1, 3.9±0.6 and 4.0±0.8 in reviewer 2, respectively). GMH, IVH, VM, and FL showed perfect concordance, while PVE showed a concordance rate of 91.4% between the two modes by both reviewers. 3DUS was associated with a higher diagnostic confidence in the evaluation of GMH, IVH, and FL than 2DUS (P<0.05) for both reviewers. For PVE, 3DUS received a significantly higher confidence score than 2DUS from one of the reviewers. The mean scanning time for 2DUS and 3DUS was 92.75 seconds and 36 seconds, respectively. Interobserver agreement for qualitative scoring was almost perfect. CONCLUSION: In reinterpretation, 3DUS showed very high concordance with 2DUS and a similar image quality. 3DUS also increased diagnostic confidence for several image findings and significantly decreased scan time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5769951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57699512018-01-19 Comparison between 3-dimensional cranial ultrasonography and conventional 2-dimensional cranial ultrasonography in neonates: impact on reinterpretation Kim, Yu Jin Choi, Young Hun Cho, Hyun Hae Lee, So Mi Park, Ji Eun Cheon, Jung-Eun Kim, Woo Sun Kim, In-One Ultrasonography Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate impact of 3-dimensional cranial ultrasonography (3DUS) on reinterpretation of cranial ultrasonography images in neonates in comparison with 2-dimensional cranial ultrasonography (2DUS). METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 50 young infants who simultaneously underwent both 2DUS and 3DUS scanning from February to March 2015. Two pediatric radiologists independently reviewed both scans for overall image quality on a 5-point scale. Five features were evaluated in both scans: the presence of germinal matrix hemorrhage (GMH), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), ventriculomegaly (VM), abnormality of periventricular echogenicity (PVE), and focal parenchymal lesions (FL). The concordance rate between the two scanning modes was calculated. The confidence level for each finding on a 3-point scale and the scanning time were compared between the two scanning modes. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using kappa statistics. RESULTS: Both scans demonstrated similar overall image quality in terms of reinterpretation (mean scores for 2DUS and 3DUS, 4.0±0.5 and 4.0±0.7 in reviewer 1, 3.9±0.6 and 4.0±0.8 in reviewer 2, respectively). GMH, IVH, VM, and FL showed perfect concordance, while PVE showed a concordance rate of 91.4% between the two modes by both reviewers. 3DUS was associated with a higher diagnostic confidence in the evaluation of GMH, IVH, and FL than 2DUS (P<0.05) for both reviewers. For PVE, 3DUS received a significantly higher confidence score than 2DUS from one of the reviewers. The mean scanning time for 2DUS and 3DUS was 92.75 seconds and 36 seconds, respectively. Interobserver agreement for qualitative scoring was almost perfect. CONCLUSION: In reinterpretation, 3DUS showed very high concordance with 2DUS and a similar image quality. 3DUS also increased diagnostic confidence for several image findings and significantly decreased scan time. Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine 2018-01 2017-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5769951/ /pubmed/28780784 http://dx.doi.org/10.14366/usg.17009 Text en Copyright © 2017 Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine (KSUM) This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Yu Jin
Choi, Young Hun
Cho, Hyun Hae
Lee, So Mi
Park, Ji Eun
Cheon, Jung-Eun
Kim, Woo Sun
Kim, In-One
Comparison between 3-dimensional cranial ultrasonography and conventional 2-dimensional cranial ultrasonography in neonates: impact on reinterpretation
title Comparison between 3-dimensional cranial ultrasonography and conventional 2-dimensional cranial ultrasonography in neonates: impact on reinterpretation
title_full Comparison between 3-dimensional cranial ultrasonography and conventional 2-dimensional cranial ultrasonography in neonates: impact on reinterpretation
title_fullStr Comparison between 3-dimensional cranial ultrasonography and conventional 2-dimensional cranial ultrasonography in neonates: impact on reinterpretation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between 3-dimensional cranial ultrasonography and conventional 2-dimensional cranial ultrasonography in neonates: impact on reinterpretation
title_short Comparison between 3-dimensional cranial ultrasonography and conventional 2-dimensional cranial ultrasonography in neonates: impact on reinterpretation
title_sort comparison between 3-dimensional cranial ultrasonography and conventional 2-dimensional cranial ultrasonography in neonates: impact on reinterpretation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5769951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28780784
http://dx.doi.org/10.14366/usg.17009
work_keys_str_mv AT kimyujin comparisonbetween3dimensionalcranialultrasonographyandconventional2dimensionalcranialultrasonographyinneonatesimpactonreinterpretation
AT choiyounghun comparisonbetween3dimensionalcranialultrasonographyandconventional2dimensionalcranialultrasonographyinneonatesimpactonreinterpretation
AT chohyunhae comparisonbetween3dimensionalcranialultrasonographyandconventional2dimensionalcranialultrasonographyinneonatesimpactonreinterpretation
AT leesomi comparisonbetween3dimensionalcranialultrasonographyandconventional2dimensionalcranialultrasonographyinneonatesimpactonreinterpretation
AT parkjieun comparisonbetween3dimensionalcranialultrasonographyandconventional2dimensionalcranialultrasonographyinneonatesimpactonreinterpretation
AT cheonjungeun comparisonbetween3dimensionalcranialultrasonographyandconventional2dimensionalcranialultrasonographyinneonatesimpactonreinterpretation
AT kimwoosun comparisonbetween3dimensionalcranialultrasonographyandconventional2dimensionalcranialultrasonographyinneonatesimpactonreinterpretation
AT kiminone comparisonbetween3dimensionalcranialultrasonographyandconventional2dimensionalcranialultrasonographyinneonatesimpactonreinterpretation