Cargando…
Endoscopic ultrasound guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in solid pancreatic masses – a prospective validation study
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a keystone in diagnosing and staging of pancreatic masses. Recently, a microfiber that can pass through a 19-gauge needle has been introduced for confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE). The aims of this study were to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2018
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29344564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-121987 |
_version_ | 1783293037934280704 |
---|---|
author | Karstensen, John Gásdal Cârţână, Tatiana Constantinescu, Codruţa Dumitrașcu, Silviu Kovacevic, Bojan Klausen, Pia Hassan, Hazem Klausen, Tobias Wirenfeldt Bertani, Helga Bhutani, Manoop S. Săftoiu, Adrian Vilmann, Peter |
author_facet | Karstensen, John Gásdal Cârţână, Tatiana Constantinescu, Codruţa Dumitrașcu, Silviu Kovacevic, Bojan Klausen, Pia Hassan, Hazem Klausen, Tobias Wirenfeldt Bertani, Helga Bhutani, Manoop S. Săftoiu, Adrian Vilmann, Peter |
author_sort | Karstensen, John Gásdal |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a keystone in diagnosing and staging of pancreatic masses. Recently, a microfiber that can pass through a 19-gauge needle has been introduced for confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE). The aims of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic value and the reproducibility of nCLE criteria for solid malignant lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective dual-center study included patients with pancreatic masses suspicious of malignancy referred for EUS-FNA. Endomicroscopic imaging was performed under EUS-guidance until organ-specific structures were obtained. Afterwards, standard cytology was obtained and patients were followed for up to 12 months. All nCLE parameters included in former studies were correlated with the final diagnosis (dark lobular structures/normal acinar cells, dark cell aggregates > 40 µm, dilated irregular vessels with fluorescein leakage, fine white fibrous bands, small black cell movements, pseudoglandular structures). Finally, three CLE novices and three CLE experts assessed the unedited movies from all patients. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. A final diagnosis was obtained in 24 patients (86 %). One patient (3 %) died before a diagnosis was obtained, while 3 were lost to follow-up (11 %). In 18/24 patients (74 %) the diagnosis was malignant. The mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the nCLE parameters ranged from 19 – 93 %, 0 – 56 %, 26 – 69 %, respectively. The inter-observer values ranged from κ = 0.20 – 0.41 for novices and κ = –0.02 – 0.38 for experts. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic value of nCLE in solid pancreatic masses is questionable and the inter-observer agreement for both novices and CLE experts appears limited. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5770262 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57702622018-01-17 Endoscopic ultrasound guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in solid pancreatic masses – a prospective validation study Karstensen, John Gásdal Cârţână, Tatiana Constantinescu, Codruţa Dumitrașcu, Silviu Kovacevic, Bojan Klausen, Pia Hassan, Hazem Klausen, Tobias Wirenfeldt Bertani, Helga Bhutani, Manoop S. Săftoiu, Adrian Vilmann, Peter Endosc Int Open BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a keystone in diagnosing and staging of pancreatic masses. Recently, a microfiber that can pass through a 19-gauge needle has been introduced for confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE). The aims of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic value and the reproducibility of nCLE criteria for solid malignant lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective dual-center study included patients with pancreatic masses suspicious of malignancy referred for EUS-FNA. Endomicroscopic imaging was performed under EUS-guidance until organ-specific structures were obtained. Afterwards, standard cytology was obtained and patients were followed for up to 12 months. All nCLE parameters included in former studies were correlated with the final diagnosis (dark lobular structures/normal acinar cells, dark cell aggregates > 40 µm, dilated irregular vessels with fluorescein leakage, fine white fibrous bands, small black cell movements, pseudoglandular structures). Finally, three CLE novices and three CLE experts assessed the unedited movies from all patients. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. A final diagnosis was obtained in 24 patients (86 %). One patient (3 %) died before a diagnosis was obtained, while 3 were lost to follow-up (11 %). In 18/24 patients (74 %) the diagnosis was malignant. The mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the nCLE parameters ranged from 19 – 93 %, 0 – 56 %, 26 – 69 %, respectively. The inter-observer values ranged from κ = 0.20 – 0.41 for novices and κ = –0.02 – 0.38 for experts. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic value of nCLE in solid pancreatic masses is questionable and the inter-observer agreement for both novices and CLE experts appears limited. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-01 2018-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5770262/ /pubmed/29344564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-121987 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Karstensen, John Gásdal Cârţână, Tatiana Constantinescu, Codruţa Dumitrașcu, Silviu Kovacevic, Bojan Klausen, Pia Hassan, Hazem Klausen, Tobias Wirenfeldt Bertani, Helga Bhutani, Manoop S. Săftoiu, Adrian Vilmann, Peter Endoscopic ultrasound guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in solid pancreatic masses – a prospective validation study |
title | Endoscopic ultrasound guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in solid pancreatic masses – a prospective validation study |
title_full | Endoscopic ultrasound guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in solid pancreatic masses – a prospective validation study |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic ultrasound guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in solid pancreatic masses – a prospective validation study |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic ultrasound guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in solid pancreatic masses – a prospective validation study |
title_short | Endoscopic ultrasound guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in solid pancreatic masses – a prospective validation study |
title_sort | endoscopic ultrasound guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in solid pancreatic masses – a prospective validation study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29344564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-121987 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karstensenjohngasdal endoscopicultrasoundguidedneedlebasedconfocallaserendomicroscopyinsolidpancreaticmassesaprospectivevalidationstudy AT cartanatatiana endoscopicultrasoundguidedneedlebasedconfocallaserendomicroscopyinsolidpancreaticmassesaprospectivevalidationstudy AT constantinescucodruta endoscopicultrasoundguidedneedlebasedconfocallaserendomicroscopyinsolidpancreaticmassesaprospectivevalidationstudy AT dumitrascusilviu endoscopicultrasoundguidedneedlebasedconfocallaserendomicroscopyinsolidpancreaticmassesaprospectivevalidationstudy AT kovacevicbojan endoscopicultrasoundguidedneedlebasedconfocallaserendomicroscopyinsolidpancreaticmassesaprospectivevalidationstudy AT klausenpia endoscopicultrasoundguidedneedlebasedconfocallaserendomicroscopyinsolidpancreaticmassesaprospectivevalidationstudy AT hassanhazem endoscopicultrasoundguidedneedlebasedconfocallaserendomicroscopyinsolidpancreaticmassesaprospectivevalidationstudy AT klausentobiaswirenfeldt endoscopicultrasoundguidedneedlebasedconfocallaserendomicroscopyinsolidpancreaticmassesaprospectivevalidationstudy AT bertanihelga endoscopicultrasoundguidedneedlebasedconfocallaserendomicroscopyinsolidpancreaticmassesaprospectivevalidationstudy AT bhutanimanoops endoscopicultrasoundguidedneedlebasedconfocallaserendomicroscopyinsolidpancreaticmassesaprospectivevalidationstudy AT saftoiuadrian endoscopicultrasoundguidedneedlebasedconfocallaserendomicroscopyinsolidpancreaticmassesaprospectivevalidationstudy AT vilmannpeter endoscopicultrasoundguidedneedlebasedconfocallaserendomicroscopyinsolidpancreaticmassesaprospectivevalidationstudy |