Cargando…
Local alkylating chemotherapy applied immediately after 5-ALA guided resection of glioblastoma does not provide additional benefit
Grade IV glioma is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumour. Gross total resection with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) guided surgery combined with local chemotherapy (carmustine wafers) is an attractive treatment strategy in these patients. No previous studies have examined the benefit ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29139095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2649-8 |
_version_ | 1783293082394951680 |
---|---|
author | Sage, William Guilfoyle, Mathew Luney, Catriona Young, Adam Sinha, Rohitashwa Sgubin, Donatella McAbee, Joseph H. Ma, Ruichong Jefferies, Sarah Jena, Rajesh Harris, Fiona Allinson, Kieren Matys, Tomasz Qian, Wendi Santarius, Thomas Price, Stephen Watts, Colin |
author_facet | Sage, William Guilfoyle, Mathew Luney, Catriona Young, Adam Sinha, Rohitashwa Sgubin, Donatella McAbee, Joseph H. Ma, Ruichong Jefferies, Sarah Jena, Rajesh Harris, Fiona Allinson, Kieren Matys, Tomasz Qian, Wendi Santarius, Thomas Price, Stephen Watts, Colin |
author_sort | Sage, William |
collection | PubMed |
description | Grade IV glioma is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumour. Gross total resection with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) guided surgery combined with local chemotherapy (carmustine wafers) is an attractive treatment strategy in these patients. No previous studies have examined the benefit carmustine wafers in a treatment programme of 5-ALA guided resection followed by a temozolomide-based chemoradiotherapy protocol. The objective of this study was to examine the benefit of carmustine wafers on survival in patients undergoing 5-ALA guided resection. A retrospective cohort study of 260 patients who underwent 5-ALA resection of confirmed WHO 2007 Grade IV glioma between July 2009 and December 2014. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method from surgery. The log-rank test was used to compare survival curves between groups. Cox regression was performed to identify variables predicting survival. A propensity score matched analysis was used to compare survival between patients who did and did not receive carmustine wafers while controlling for baseline characteristics. Propensity matched analysis showed no significant survival benefit of insertion of carmustine wafers over 5-ALA resection alone (HR 0.97 [0.68–1.26], p = 0.836). There was a trend to higher incidence of wound infection in those who received carmustine wafers (15.4 vs. 7.1%, p = 0.064). The Cox regression analysis showed that intraoperative residual fluorescent tumour and residual enhancing tumour on post-operative MRI were significantly predictive of reduced survival. Carmustine wafers have no added benefit following 5-ALA guided resection. Residual fluorescence and residual enhancing disease following resection have a negative impact on survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5770495 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57704952018-01-29 Local alkylating chemotherapy applied immediately after 5-ALA guided resection of glioblastoma does not provide additional benefit Sage, William Guilfoyle, Mathew Luney, Catriona Young, Adam Sinha, Rohitashwa Sgubin, Donatella McAbee, Joseph H. Ma, Ruichong Jefferies, Sarah Jena, Rajesh Harris, Fiona Allinson, Kieren Matys, Tomasz Qian, Wendi Santarius, Thomas Price, Stephen Watts, Colin J Neurooncol Clinical Study Grade IV glioma is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumour. Gross total resection with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) guided surgery combined with local chemotherapy (carmustine wafers) is an attractive treatment strategy in these patients. No previous studies have examined the benefit carmustine wafers in a treatment programme of 5-ALA guided resection followed by a temozolomide-based chemoradiotherapy protocol. The objective of this study was to examine the benefit of carmustine wafers on survival in patients undergoing 5-ALA guided resection. A retrospective cohort study of 260 patients who underwent 5-ALA resection of confirmed WHO 2007 Grade IV glioma between July 2009 and December 2014. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method from surgery. The log-rank test was used to compare survival curves between groups. Cox regression was performed to identify variables predicting survival. A propensity score matched analysis was used to compare survival between patients who did and did not receive carmustine wafers while controlling for baseline characteristics. Propensity matched analysis showed no significant survival benefit of insertion of carmustine wafers over 5-ALA resection alone (HR 0.97 [0.68–1.26], p = 0.836). There was a trend to higher incidence of wound infection in those who received carmustine wafers (15.4 vs. 7.1%, p = 0.064). The Cox regression analysis showed that intraoperative residual fluorescent tumour and residual enhancing tumour on post-operative MRI were significantly predictive of reduced survival. Carmustine wafers have no added benefit following 5-ALA guided resection. Residual fluorescence and residual enhancing disease following resection have a negative impact on survival. Springer US 2017-11-14 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5770495/ /pubmed/29139095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2649-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Sage, William Guilfoyle, Mathew Luney, Catriona Young, Adam Sinha, Rohitashwa Sgubin, Donatella McAbee, Joseph H. Ma, Ruichong Jefferies, Sarah Jena, Rajesh Harris, Fiona Allinson, Kieren Matys, Tomasz Qian, Wendi Santarius, Thomas Price, Stephen Watts, Colin Local alkylating chemotherapy applied immediately after 5-ALA guided resection of glioblastoma does not provide additional benefit |
title | Local alkylating chemotherapy applied immediately after 5-ALA guided resection of glioblastoma does not provide additional benefit |
title_full | Local alkylating chemotherapy applied immediately after 5-ALA guided resection of glioblastoma does not provide additional benefit |
title_fullStr | Local alkylating chemotherapy applied immediately after 5-ALA guided resection of glioblastoma does not provide additional benefit |
title_full_unstemmed | Local alkylating chemotherapy applied immediately after 5-ALA guided resection of glioblastoma does not provide additional benefit |
title_short | Local alkylating chemotherapy applied immediately after 5-ALA guided resection of glioblastoma does not provide additional benefit |
title_sort | local alkylating chemotherapy applied immediately after 5-ala guided resection of glioblastoma does not provide additional benefit |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770495/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29139095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2649-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sagewilliam localalkylatingchemotherapyappliedimmediatelyafter5alaguidedresectionofglioblastomadoesnotprovideadditionalbenefit AT guilfoylemathew localalkylatingchemotherapyappliedimmediatelyafter5alaguidedresectionofglioblastomadoesnotprovideadditionalbenefit AT luneycatriona localalkylatingchemotherapyappliedimmediatelyafter5alaguidedresectionofglioblastomadoesnotprovideadditionalbenefit AT youngadam localalkylatingchemotherapyappliedimmediatelyafter5alaguidedresectionofglioblastomadoesnotprovideadditionalbenefit AT sinharohitashwa localalkylatingchemotherapyappliedimmediatelyafter5alaguidedresectionofglioblastomadoesnotprovideadditionalbenefit AT sgubindonatella localalkylatingchemotherapyappliedimmediatelyafter5alaguidedresectionofglioblastomadoesnotprovideadditionalbenefit AT mcabeejosephh localalkylatingchemotherapyappliedimmediatelyafter5alaguidedresectionofglioblastomadoesnotprovideadditionalbenefit AT maruichong localalkylatingchemotherapyappliedimmediatelyafter5alaguidedresectionofglioblastomadoesnotprovideadditionalbenefit AT jefferiessarah localalkylatingchemotherapyappliedimmediatelyafter5alaguidedresectionofglioblastomadoesnotprovideadditionalbenefit AT jenarajesh localalkylatingchemotherapyappliedimmediatelyafter5alaguidedresectionofglioblastomadoesnotprovideadditionalbenefit AT harrisfiona localalkylatingchemotherapyappliedimmediatelyafter5alaguidedresectionofglioblastomadoesnotprovideadditionalbenefit AT allinsonkieren localalkylatingchemotherapyappliedimmediatelyafter5alaguidedresectionofglioblastomadoesnotprovideadditionalbenefit AT matystomasz localalkylatingchemotherapyappliedimmediatelyafter5alaguidedresectionofglioblastomadoesnotprovideadditionalbenefit AT qianwendi localalkylatingchemotherapyappliedimmediatelyafter5alaguidedresectionofglioblastomadoesnotprovideadditionalbenefit AT santariusthomas localalkylatingchemotherapyappliedimmediatelyafter5alaguidedresectionofglioblastomadoesnotprovideadditionalbenefit AT pricestephen localalkylatingchemotherapyappliedimmediatelyafter5alaguidedresectionofglioblastomadoesnotprovideadditionalbenefit AT wattscolin localalkylatingchemotherapyappliedimmediatelyafter5alaguidedresectionofglioblastomadoesnotprovideadditionalbenefit |