Cargando…

Development of a Symptom-Focused Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Functional Dyspepsia: The Functional Dyspepsia Symptom Diary (FDSD)

OBJECTIVES: The Functional Dyspepsia Symptom Diary (FDSD) was developed to address the lack of symptom-focused, patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures designed for use in functional dyspepsia (FD) patients and meeting Food and Drug Administration recommendations for PRO instrument development. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor, Fiona, Higgins, Sophie, Carson, Robyn T, Eremenco, Sonya, Foley, Catherine, Lacy, Brian E, Parkman, Henry P, Reasner, David S, Shields, Alan L, Tack, Jan, Talley, Nicholas J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28925989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2017.265
_version_ 1783293100823674880
author Taylor, Fiona
Higgins, Sophie
Carson, Robyn T
Eremenco, Sonya
Foley, Catherine
Lacy, Brian E
Parkman, Henry P
Reasner, David S
Shields, Alan L
Tack, Jan
Talley, Nicholas J
author_facet Taylor, Fiona
Higgins, Sophie
Carson, Robyn T
Eremenco, Sonya
Foley, Catherine
Lacy, Brian E
Parkman, Henry P
Reasner, David S
Shields, Alan L
Tack, Jan
Talley, Nicholas J
author_sort Taylor, Fiona
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The Functional Dyspepsia Symptom Diary (FDSD) was developed to address the lack of symptom-focused, patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures designed for use in functional dyspepsia (FD) patients and meeting Food and Drug Administration recommendations for PRO instrument development. METHODS: Concept elicitation interviews were conducted with FD participants to identify symptoms important and relevant to FD patients. A preliminary version of the FDSD was constructed, then completed by FD participants on an electronic device in cognitive interviews to evaluate the readability, comprehensibility, relevance, and comprehensiveness of the FDSD, and to preliminarily evaluate its measurement properties. RESULTS: During concept elicitation interviews, 45 participants spontaneously reported 19 symptom concepts. Of those, seven symptoms were selected for assessment by the eight-item FDSD. Cognitive interviews with 57 participants confirmed that participants were able to comprehend and provide meaningful responses to the FDSD, and that the handheld electronic FDSD format was suitable for use in the target population. Scores of the FDSD were well-distributed among response options, item discrimination indices suggested that the FDSD items differentiate among patients with varying degrees of FD severity, and inter-item correlations suggested that no items of the FDSD were capturing redundant information. Internal consistency estimates (0.87) and construct-related validity estimates using known-groups methods were within acceptable ranges. CONCLUSIONS: The FDSD is a content-valid PRO measure, with preliminary psychometric evidence providing support for the FDSD’s items and total score. Further psychometric evaluations are recommended to more fully test the FDSD’s score performance and other measurement properties in the target patient population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5770596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57705962018-01-22 Development of a Symptom-Focused Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Functional Dyspepsia: The Functional Dyspepsia Symptom Diary (FDSD) Taylor, Fiona Higgins, Sophie Carson, Robyn T Eremenco, Sonya Foley, Catherine Lacy, Brian E Parkman, Henry P Reasner, David S Shields, Alan L Tack, Jan Talley, Nicholas J Am J Gastroenterol Stomach OBJECTIVES: The Functional Dyspepsia Symptom Diary (FDSD) was developed to address the lack of symptom-focused, patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures designed for use in functional dyspepsia (FD) patients and meeting Food and Drug Administration recommendations for PRO instrument development. METHODS: Concept elicitation interviews were conducted with FD participants to identify symptoms important and relevant to FD patients. A preliminary version of the FDSD was constructed, then completed by FD participants on an electronic device in cognitive interviews to evaluate the readability, comprehensibility, relevance, and comprehensiveness of the FDSD, and to preliminarily evaluate its measurement properties. RESULTS: During concept elicitation interviews, 45 participants spontaneously reported 19 symptom concepts. Of those, seven symptoms were selected for assessment by the eight-item FDSD. Cognitive interviews with 57 participants confirmed that participants were able to comprehend and provide meaningful responses to the FDSD, and that the handheld electronic FDSD format was suitable for use in the target population. Scores of the FDSD were well-distributed among response options, item discrimination indices suggested that the FDSD items differentiate among patients with varying degrees of FD severity, and inter-item correlations suggested that no items of the FDSD were capturing redundant information. Internal consistency estimates (0.87) and construct-related validity estimates using known-groups methods were within acceptable ranges. CONCLUSIONS: The FDSD is a content-valid PRO measure, with preliminary psychometric evidence providing support for the FDSD’s items and total score. Further psychometric evaluations are recommended to more fully test the FDSD’s score performance and other measurement properties in the target patient population. Nature Publishing Group 2018-01 2017-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5770596/ /pubmed/28925989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2017.265 Text en Copyright © 2018 American College of Gastroenterology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Stomach
Taylor, Fiona
Higgins, Sophie
Carson, Robyn T
Eremenco, Sonya
Foley, Catherine
Lacy, Brian E
Parkman, Henry P
Reasner, David S
Shields, Alan L
Tack, Jan
Talley, Nicholas J
Development of a Symptom-Focused Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Functional Dyspepsia: The Functional Dyspepsia Symptom Diary (FDSD)
title Development of a Symptom-Focused Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Functional Dyspepsia: The Functional Dyspepsia Symptom Diary (FDSD)
title_full Development of a Symptom-Focused Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Functional Dyspepsia: The Functional Dyspepsia Symptom Diary (FDSD)
title_fullStr Development of a Symptom-Focused Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Functional Dyspepsia: The Functional Dyspepsia Symptom Diary (FDSD)
title_full_unstemmed Development of a Symptom-Focused Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Functional Dyspepsia: The Functional Dyspepsia Symptom Diary (FDSD)
title_short Development of a Symptom-Focused Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Functional Dyspepsia: The Functional Dyspepsia Symptom Diary (FDSD)
title_sort development of a symptom-focused patient-reported outcome measure for functional dyspepsia: the functional dyspepsia symptom diary (fdsd)
topic Stomach
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28925989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2017.265
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorfiona developmentofasymptomfocusedpatientreportedoutcomemeasureforfunctionaldyspepsiathefunctionaldyspepsiasymptomdiaryfdsd
AT higginssophie developmentofasymptomfocusedpatientreportedoutcomemeasureforfunctionaldyspepsiathefunctionaldyspepsiasymptomdiaryfdsd
AT carsonrobynt developmentofasymptomfocusedpatientreportedoutcomemeasureforfunctionaldyspepsiathefunctionaldyspepsiasymptomdiaryfdsd
AT eremencosonya developmentofasymptomfocusedpatientreportedoutcomemeasureforfunctionaldyspepsiathefunctionaldyspepsiasymptomdiaryfdsd
AT foleycatherine developmentofasymptomfocusedpatientreportedoutcomemeasureforfunctionaldyspepsiathefunctionaldyspepsiasymptomdiaryfdsd
AT lacybriane developmentofasymptomfocusedpatientreportedoutcomemeasureforfunctionaldyspepsiathefunctionaldyspepsiasymptomdiaryfdsd
AT parkmanhenryp developmentofasymptomfocusedpatientreportedoutcomemeasureforfunctionaldyspepsiathefunctionaldyspepsiasymptomdiaryfdsd
AT reasnerdavids developmentofasymptomfocusedpatientreportedoutcomemeasureforfunctionaldyspepsiathefunctionaldyspepsiasymptomdiaryfdsd
AT shieldsalanl developmentofasymptomfocusedpatientreportedoutcomemeasureforfunctionaldyspepsiathefunctionaldyspepsiasymptomdiaryfdsd
AT tackjan developmentofasymptomfocusedpatientreportedoutcomemeasureforfunctionaldyspepsiathefunctionaldyspepsiasymptomdiaryfdsd
AT talleynicholasj developmentofasymptomfocusedpatientreportedoutcomemeasureforfunctionaldyspepsiathefunctionaldyspepsiasymptomdiaryfdsd