Cargando…

A Meta-Analysis of Adenosine A2A Receptor Antagonists on Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia In Vivo

BACKGROUND: Long-term use of levodopa (l-dopa) is inevitably complicated with highly disabling fluctuations and drug-induced dyskinesias, which pose major challenges to the existing drug therapy of Parkinson’s disease. METHODS: In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to ass...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Wen-Wen, Zhang, Man-Man, Zhang, Xing-Ru, Zhang, Zeng-Rui, Chen, Jie, Feng, Liang, Xie, Cheng-Long
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375464
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00702
_version_ 1783293123888152576
author Wang, Wen-Wen
Zhang, Man-Man
Zhang, Xing-Ru
Zhang, Zeng-Rui
Chen, Jie
Feng, Liang
Xie, Cheng-Long
author_facet Wang, Wen-Wen
Zhang, Man-Man
Zhang, Xing-Ru
Zhang, Zeng-Rui
Chen, Jie
Feng, Liang
Xie, Cheng-Long
author_sort Wang, Wen-Wen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Long-term use of levodopa (l-dopa) is inevitably complicated with highly disabling fluctuations and drug-induced dyskinesias, which pose major challenges to the existing drug therapy of Parkinson’s disease. METHODS: In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of A2A receptor antagonists on reducing l-dopa-induced dyskinesias (LID). RESULTS: Nine studies with a total of 152 animals were included in this meta-analysis. Total abnormal involuntary movements (AIM) score, locomotor activity, and motor disability were reported as outcome measures in 5, 5, and 3 studies, respectively. Combined standardized mean difference (SMD) estimates were calculated using a random-effects model. We pooled the whole data and found that, when compared to l-dopa alone, A2A receptor antagonists plus l-dopa treatment showed no effect on locomotor activity (SMD −0.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): −2.52 to 2.52, p = 1.0), superiority in improvement of motor disability (SMD −5.06, 95% CI: −9.25 to −0.87, p = 0.02) and more effective in control of AIM (SMD −1.82, 95% CI: −3.38 to −0.25, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: To sum up, these results demonstrated that A2A receptor antagonists appear to have efficacy in animal models of LID. However, large randomized clinical trials testing the effects of A2A receptor antagonists in LID patients are always warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5770694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57706942018-01-26 A Meta-Analysis of Adenosine A2A Receptor Antagonists on Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia In Vivo Wang, Wen-Wen Zhang, Man-Man Zhang, Xing-Ru Zhang, Zeng-Rui Chen, Jie Feng, Liang Xie, Cheng-Long Front Neurol Neuroscience BACKGROUND: Long-term use of levodopa (l-dopa) is inevitably complicated with highly disabling fluctuations and drug-induced dyskinesias, which pose major challenges to the existing drug therapy of Parkinson’s disease. METHODS: In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of A2A receptor antagonists on reducing l-dopa-induced dyskinesias (LID). RESULTS: Nine studies with a total of 152 animals were included in this meta-analysis. Total abnormal involuntary movements (AIM) score, locomotor activity, and motor disability were reported as outcome measures in 5, 5, and 3 studies, respectively. Combined standardized mean difference (SMD) estimates were calculated using a random-effects model. We pooled the whole data and found that, when compared to l-dopa alone, A2A receptor antagonists plus l-dopa treatment showed no effect on locomotor activity (SMD −0.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): −2.52 to 2.52, p = 1.0), superiority in improvement of motor disability (SMD −5.06, 95% CI: −9.25 to −0.87, p = 0.02) and more effective in control of AIM (SMD −1.82, 95% CI: −3.38 to −0.25, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: To sum up, these results demonstrated that A2A receptor antagonists appear to have efficacy in animal models of LID. However, large randomized clinical trials testing the effects of A2A receptor antagonists in LID patients are always warranted. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5770694/ /pubmed/29375464 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00702 Text en Copyright © 2017 Wang, Zhang, Zhang, Zhang, Chen, Feng and Xie. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Wang, Wen-Wen
Zhang, Man-Man
Zhang, Xing-Ru
Zhang, Zeng-Rui
Chen, Jie
Feng, Liang
Xie, Cheng-Long
A Meta-Analysis of Adenosine A2A Receptor Antagonists on Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia In Vivo
title A Meta-Analysis of Adenosine A2A Receptor Antagonists on Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia In Vivo
title_full A Meta-Analysis of Adenosine A2A Receptor Antagonists on Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia In Vivo
title_fullStr A Meta-Analysis of Adenosine A2A Receptor Antagonists on Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia In Vivo
title_full_unstemmed A Meta-Analysis of Adenosine A2A Receptor Antagonists on Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia In Vivo
title_short A Meta-Analysis of Adenosine A2A Receptor Antagonists on Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia In Vivo
title_sort meta-analysis of adenosine a2a receptor antagonists on levodopa-induced dyskinesia in vivo
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375464
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00702
work_keys_str_mv AT wangwenwen ametaanalysisofadenosinea2areceptorantagonistsonlevodopainduceddyskinesiainvivo
AT zhangmanman ametaanalysisofadenosinea2areceptorantagonistsonlevodopainduceddyskinesiainvivo
AT zhangxingru ametaanalysisofadenosinea2areceptorantagonistsonlevodopainduceddyskinesiainvivo
AT zhangzengrui ametaanalysisofadenosinea2areceptorantagonistsonlevodopainduceddyskinesiainvivo
AT chenjie ametaanalysisofadenosinea2areceptorantagonistsonlevodopainduceddyskinesiainvivo
AT fengliang ametaanalysisofadenosinea2areceptorantagonistsonlevodopainduceddyskinesiainvivo
AT xiechenglong ametaanalysisofadenosinea2areceptorantagonistsonlevodopainduceddyskinesiainvivo
AT wangwenwen metaanalysisofadenosinea2areceptorantagonistsonlevodopainduceddyskinesiainvivo
AT zhangmanman metaanalysisofadenosinea2areceptorantagonistsonlevodopainduceddyskinesiainvivo
AT zhangxingru metaanalysisofadenosinea2areceptorantagonistsonlevodopainduceddyskinesiainvivo
AT zhangzengrui metaanalysisofadenosinea2areceptorantagonistsonlevodopainduceddyskinesiainvivo
AT chenjie metaanalysisofadenosinea2areceptorantagonistsonlevodopainduceddyskinesiainvivo
AT fengliang metaanalysisofadenosinea2areceptorantagonistsonlevodopainduceddyskinesiainvivo
AT xiechenglong metaanalysisofadenosinea2areceptorantagonistsonlevodopainduceddyskinesiainvivo