Cargando…

Implementation of a lung cancer multidisciplinary team standardised template for reporting to general practitioners: a mixed-method study

OBJECTIVES: Few interventions have been designed that provide standardised information to primary care clinicians about the diagnostic and treatment recommendations resulting from cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT) (tumour board) meetings. This study aimed to develop, implement and evaluate a stand...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rankin, Nicole M, Collett, Gemma K, Brown, Clare M, Shaw, Tim J, White, Kahren M, Beale, Philip J, Trevena, Lyndal J, Anderiesz, Cleola, Barnes, David J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29288182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018629
_version_ 1783293140773371904
author Rankin, Nicole M
Collett, Gemma K
Brown, Clare M
Shaw, Tim J
White, Kahren M
Beale, Philip J
Trevena, Lyndal J
Anderiesz, Cleola
Barnes, David J
author_facet Rankin, Nicole M
Collett, Gemma K
Brown, Clare M
Shaw, Tim J
White, Kahren M
Beale, Philip J
Trevena, Lyndal J
Anderiesz, Cleola
Barnes, David J
author_sort Rankin, Nicole M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Few interventions have been designed that provide standardised information to primary care clinicians about the diagnostic and treatment recommendations resulting from cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT) (tumour board) meetings. This study aimed to develop, implement and evaluate a standardised template for lung cancer MDTs to provide clinical information and treatment recommendations to general practitioners (GPs). Specific objectives were to (1) evaluate template feasibility (acceptability, appropriateness and timeliness) with GPs and (2) document processes of preimplementation, implementation and evaluation within the MDT setting. DESIGN: A mixed-method study design using structured interviews with GPs and qualitative documentation of project logs about implementation processes. SETTING: Two hospitals in Central Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Participants: 61 GPs evaluated the template. Two lung cancer MDTs, consisting of 33 clinicians, and eight researchers participated in template development and implementation strategy. RESULTS: The MDT-reporting template appears to be a feasible way of providing clinical information to GPs following patient presentation at a lung cancer MDT meeting. Ninety-five per cent of GPs strongly agreed or agreed that the standardised template provided useful and relevant information, that it was received in a timely manner (90%) and that the information was easy to interpret and communicate to the patient (84%). Implementation process data show that the investment made in the preimplementation stage to integrate the template into standard work practices was a critical factor in successful implementation. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that it is feasible to provide lung cancer MDT treatment recommendations to GPs through implementation of a standardised template. A simple intervention, such as a standardised template, can help to address quality gaps and ensure that timely information is communicated between tertiary and primary care healthcare providers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5770820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57708202018-01-19 Implementation of a lung cancer multidisciplinary team standardised template for reporting to general practitioners: a mixed-method study Rankin, Nicole M Collett, Gemma K Brown, Clare M Shaw, Tim J White, Kahren M Beale, Philip J Trevena, Lyndal J Anderiesz, Cleola Barnes, David J BMJ Open Oncology OBJECTIVES: Few interventions have been designed that provide standardised information to primary care clinicians about the diagnostic and treatment recommendations resulting from cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT) (tumour board) meetings. This study aimed to develop, implement and evaluate a standardised template for lung cancer MDTs to provide clinical information and treatment recommendations to general practitioners (GPs). Specific objectives were to (1) evaluate template feasibility (acceptability, appropriateness and timeliness) with GPs and (2) document processes of preimplementation, implementation and evaluation within the MDT setting. DESIGN: A mixed-method study design using structured interviews with GPs and qualitative documentation of project logs about implementation processes. SETTING: Two hospitals in Central Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Participants: 61 GPs evaluated the template. Two lung cancer MDTs, consisting of 33 clinicians, and eight researchers participated in template development and implementation strategy. RESULTS: The MDT-reporting template appears to be a feasible way of providing clinical information to GPs following patient presentation at a lung cancer MDT meeting. Ninety-five per cent of GPs strongly agreed or agreed that the standardised template provided useful and relevant information, that it was received in a timely manner (90%) and that the information was easy to interpret and communicate to the patient (84%). Implementation process data show that the investment made in the preimplementation stage to integrate the template into standard work practices was a critical factor in successful implementation. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that it is feasible to provide lung cancer MDT treatment recommendations to GPs through implementation of a standardised template. A simple intervention, such as a standardised template, can help to address quality gaps and ensure that timely information is communicated between tertiary and primary care healthcare providers. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5770820/ /pubmed/29288182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018629 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Oncology
Rankin, Nicole M
Collett, Gemma K
Brown, Clare M
Shaw, Tim J
White, Kahren M
Beale, Philip J
Trevena, Lyndal J
Anderiesz, Cleola
Barnes, David J
Implementation of a lung cancer multidisciplinary team standardised template for reporting to general practitioners: a mixed-method study
title Implementation of a lung cancer multidisciplinary team standardised template for reporting to general practitioners: a mixed-method study
title_full Implementation of a lung cancer multidisciplinary team standardised template for reporting to general practitioners: a mixed-method study
title_fullStr Implementation of a lung cancer multidisciplinary team standardised template for reporting to general practitioners: a mixed-method study
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of a lung cancer multidisciplinary team standardised template for reporting to general practitioners: a mixed-method study
title_short Implementation of a lung cancer multidisciplinary team standardised template for reporting to general practitioners: a mixed-method study
title_sort implementation of a lung cancer multidisciplinary team standardised template for reporting to general practitioners: a mixed-method study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29288182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018629
work_keys_str_mv AT rankinnicolem implementationofalungcancermultidisciplinaryteamstandardisedtemplateforreportingtogeneralpractitionersamixedmethodstudy
AT collettgemmak implementationofalungcancermultidisciplinaryteamstandardisedtemplateforreportingtogeneralpractitionersamixedmethodstudy
AT brownclarem implementationofalungcancermultidisciplinaryteamstandardisedtemplateforreportingtogeneralpractitionersamixedmethodstudy
AT shawtimj implementationofalungcancermultidisciplinaryteamstandardisedtemplateforreportingtogeneralpractitionersamixedmethodstudy
AT whitekahrenm implementationofalungcancermultidisciplinaryteamstandardisedtemplateforreportingtogeneralpractitionersamixedmethodstudy
AT bealephilipj implementationofalungcancermultidisciplinaryteamstandardisedtemplateforreportingtogeneralpractitionersamixedmethodstudy
AT trevenalyndalj implementationofalungcancermultidisciplinaryteamstandardisedtemplateforreportingtogeneralpractitionersamixedmethodstudy
AT anderieszcleola implementationofalungcancermultidisciplinaryteamstandardisedtemplateforreportingtogeneralpractitionersamixedmethodstudy
AT barnesdavidj implementationofalungcancermultidisciplinaryteamstandardisedtemplateforreportingtogeneralpractitionersamixedmethodstudy