Cargando…
Applicability of evidence from previous systematic reviews on immunotherapy in current practice of childhood asthma treatment: a GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) systematic review
OBJECTIVE: Because most children with asthma now use inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), the added benefit of immunotherapy in asthmatic children needs to be examined. We re-assessed the effectiveness of subcutaneous (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in childhood asthma treatment focusing on stu...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29288175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016326 |
_version_ | 1783293144558731264 |
---|---|
author | van de Griendt, Erik-Jonas Tuut, Mariska K de Groot, Hans Brand, Paul L P |
author_facet | van de Griendt, Erik-Jonas Tuut, Mariska K de Groot, Hans Brand, Paul L P |
author_sort | van de Griendt, Erik-Jonas |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Because most children with asthma now use inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), the added benefit of immunotherapy in asthmatic children needs to be examined. We re-assessed the effectiveness of subcutaneous (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in childhood asthma treatment focusing on studies with patient-relevant outcome measures and children using ICS. METHODS: We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to systematically search and appraise the evidence using predefined critical patient-relevant outcomes (asthma symptoms, asthma control and exacerbations). We searched to retrieve systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials on immunotherapy for asthma in children (1960–2017). We assessed the quality of the body of evidence with GRADE criteria. RESULTS: The quality of the evidence for SCIT was very low due to a large risk of bias and indirectness (dated studies in children not using ICS). No effect of SCIT was found for asthma symptoms; no studies reported on asthma control. For asthma exacerbations, studies favoured SCIT. We have little confidence in this effect estimate, due to the very low quality of evidence. For SLIT, quality of the evidence was very low due to a large risk of bias, indirectness and imprecision. The outcome ‘asthma symptoms’ could not be calculated due to lack of standardisation and large clinical heterogeneity. Other predefined outcomes were not reported. CONCLUSION: The beneficial effects of immunotherapy in childhood asthma found in earlier reviews are no longer considered applicable, because of indirectness (studies performed in children not being treated according to current asthma guidelines with ICS). There was absence of evidence to properly determine the effectiveness or lack thereof of immunotherapy in asthma treatment in children with ICS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5770836 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57708362018-01-19 Applicability of evidence from previous systematic reviews on immunotherapy in current practice of childhood asthma treatment: a GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) systematic review van de Griendt, Erik-Jonas Tuut, Mariska K de Groot, Hans Brand, Paul L P BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVE: Because most children with asthma now use inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), the added benefit of immunotherapy in asthmatic children needs to be examined. We re-assessed the effectiveness of subcutaneous (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in childhood asthma treatment focusing on studies with patient-relevant outcome measures and children using ICS. METHODS: We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to systematically search and appraise the evidence using predefined critical patient-relevant outcomes (asthma symptoms, asthma control and exacerbations). We searched to retrieve systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials on immunotherapy for asthma in children (1960–2017). We assessed the quality of the body of evidence with GRADE criteria. RESULTS: The quality of the evidence for SCIT was very low due to a large risk of bias and indirectness (dated studies in children not using ICS). No effect of SCIT was found for asthma symptoms; no studies reported on asthma control. For asthma exacerbations, studies favoured SCIT. We have little confidence in this effect estimate, due to the very low quality of evidence. For SLIT, quality of the evidence was very low due to a large risk of bias, indirectness and imprecision. The outcome ‘asthma symptoms’ could not be calculated due to lack of standardisation and large clinical heterogeneity. Other predefined outcomes were not reported. CONCLUSION: The beneficial effects of immunotherapy in childhood asthma found in earlier reviews are no longer considered applicable, because of indirectness (studies performed in children not being treated according to current asthma guidelines with ICS). There was absence of evidence to properly determine the effectiveness or lack thereof of immunotherapy in asthma treatment in children with ICS. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5770836/ /pubmed/29288175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016326 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Evidence Based Practice van de Griendt, Erik-Jonas Tuut, Mariska K de Groot, Hans Brand, Paul L P Applicability of evidence from previous systematic reviews on immunotherapy in current practice of childhood asthma treatment: a GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) systematic review |
title | Applicability of evidence from previous systematic reviews on immunotherapy in current practice of childhood asthma treatment: a GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) systematic review |
title_full | Applicability of evidence from previous systematic reviews on immunotherapy in current practice of childhood asthma treatment: a GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) systematic review |
title_fullStr | Applicability of evidence from previous systematic reviews on immunotherapy in current practice of childhood asthma treatment: a GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Applicability of evidence from previous systematic reviews on immunotherapy in current practice of childhood asthma treatment: a GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) systematic review |
title_short | Applicability of evidence from previous systematic reviews on immunotherapy in current practice of childhood asthma treatment: a GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) systematic review |
title_sort | applicability of evidence from previous systematic reviews on immunotherapy in current practice of childhood asthma treatment: a grade (grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation) systematic review |
topic | Evidence Based Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29288175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016326 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandegriendterikjonas applicabilityofevidencefromprevioussystematicreviewsonimmunotherapyincurrentpracticeofchildhoodasthmatreatmentagradegradingofrecommendationsassessmentdevelopmentandevaluationsystematicreview AT tuutmariskak applicabilityofevidencefromprevioussystematicreviewsonimmunotherapyincurrentpracticeofchildhoodasthmatreatmentagradegradingofrecommendationsassessmentdevelopmentandevaluationsystematicreview AT degroothans applicabilityofevidencefromprevioussystematicreviewsonimmunotherapyincurrentpracticeofchildhoodasthmatreatmentagradegradingofrecommendationsassessmentdevelopmentandevaluationsystematicreview AT brandpaullp applicabilityofevidencefromprevioussystematicreviewsonimmunotherapyincurrentpracticeofchildhoodasthmatreatmentagradegradingofrecommendationsassessmentdevelopmentandevaluationsystematicreview |