Cargando…

Applicability of evidence from previous systematic reviews on immunotherapy in current practice of childhood asthma treatment: a GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) systematic review

OBJECTIVE: Because most children with asthma now use inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), the added benefit of immunotherapy in asthmatic children needs to be examined. We re-assessed the effectiveness of subcutaneous (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in childhood asthma treatment focusing on stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van de Griendt, Erik-Jonas, Tuut, Mariska K, de Groot, Hans, Brand, Paul L P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29288175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016326
_version_ 1783293144558731264
author van de Griendt, Erik-Jonas
Tuut, Mariska K
de Groot, Hans
Brand, Paul L P
author_facet van de Griendt, Erik-Jonas
Tuut, Mariska K
de Groot, Hans
Brand, Paul L P
author_sort van de Griendt, Erik-Jonas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Because most children with asthma now use inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), the added benefit of immunotherapy in asthmatic children needs to be examined. We re-assessed the effectiveness of subcutaneous (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in childhood asthma treatment focusing on studies with patient-relevant outcome measures and children using ICS. METHODS: We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to systematically search and appraise the evidence using predefined critical patient-relevant outcomes (asthma symptoms, asthma control and exacerbations). We searched to retrieve systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials on immunotherapy for asthma in children (1960–2017). We assessed the quality of the body of evidence with GRADE criteria. RESULTS: The quality of the evidence for SCIT was very low due to a large risk of bias and indirectness (dated studies in children not using ICS). No effect of SCIT was found for asthma symptoms; no studies reported on asthma control. For asthma exacerbations, studies favoured SCIT. We have little confidence in this effect estimate, due to the very low quality of evidence. For SLIT, quality of the evidence was very low due to a large risk of bias, indirectness and imprecision. The outcome ‘asthma symptoms’ could not be calculated due to lack of standardisation and large clinical heterogeneity. Other predefined outcomes were not reported. CONCLUSION: The beneficial effects of immunotherapy in childhood asthma found in earlier reviews are no longer considered applicable, because of indirectness (studies performed in children not being treated according to current asthma guidelines with ICS). There was absence of evidence to properly determine the effectiveness or lack thereof of immunotherapy in asthma treatment in children with ICS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5770836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57708362018-01-19 Applicability of evidence from previous systematic reviews on immunotherapy in current practice of childhood asthma treatment: a GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) systematic review van de Griendt, Erik-Jonas Tuut, Mariska K de Groot, Hans Brand, Paul L P BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVE: Because most children with asthma now use inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), the added benefit of immunotherapy in asthmatic children needs to be examined. We re-assessed the effectiveness of subcutaneous (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in childhood asthma treatment focusing on studies with patient-relevant outcome measures and children using ICS. METHODS: We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to systematically search and appraise the evidence using predefined critical patient-relevant outcomes (asthma symptoms, asthma control and exacerbations). We searched to retrieve systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials on immunotherapy for asthma in children (1960–2017). We assessed the quality of the body of evidence with GRADE criteria. RESULTS: The quality of the evidence for SCIT was very low due to a large risk of bias and indirectness (dated studies in children not using ICS). No effect of SCIT was found for asthma symptoms; no studies reported on asthma control. For asthma exacerbations, studies favoured SCIT. We have little confidence in this effect estimate, due to the very low quality of evidence. For SLIT, quality of the evidence was very low due to a large risk of bias, indirectness and imprecision. The outcome ‘asthma symptoms’ could not be calculated due to lack of standardisation and large clinical heterogeneity. Other predefined outcomes were not reported. CONCLUSION: The beneficial effects of immunotherapy in childhood asthma found in earlier reviews are no longer considered applicable, because of indirectness (studies performed in children not being treated according to current asthma guidelines with ICS). There was absence of evidence to properly determine the effectiveness or lack thereof of immunotherapy in asthma treatment in children with ICS. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5770836/ /pubmed/29288175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016326 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
van de Griendt, Erik-Jonas
Tuut, Mariska K
de Groot, Hans
Brand, Paul L P
Applicability of evidence from previous systematic reviews on immunotherapy in current practice of childhood asthma treatment: a GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) systematic review
title Applicability of evidence from previous systematic reviews on immunotherapy in current practice of childhood asthma treatment: a GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) systematic review
title_full Applicability of evidence from previous systematic reviews on immunotherapy in current practice of childhood asthma treatment: a GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) systematic review
title_fullStr Applicability of evidence from previous systematic reviews on immunotherapy in current practice of childhood asthma treatment: a GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Applicability of evidence from previous systematic reviews on immunotherapy in current practice of childhood asthma treatment: a GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) systematic review
title_short Applicability of evidence from previous systematic reviews on immunotherapy in current practice of childhood asthma treatment: a GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) systematic review
title_sort applicability of evidence from previous systematic reviews on immunotherapy in current practice of childhood asthma treatment: a grade (grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation) systematic review
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29288175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016326
work_keys_str_mv AT vandegriendterikjonas applicabilityofevidencefromprevioussystematicreviewsonimmunotherapyincurrentpracticeofchildhoodasthmatreatmentagradegradingofrecommendationsassessmentdevelopmentandevaluationsystematicreview
AT tuutmariskak applicabilityofevidencefromprevioussystematicreviewsonimmunotherapyincurrentpracticeofchildhoodasthmatreatmentagradegradingofrecommendationsassessmentdevelopmentandevaluationsystematicreview
AT degroothans applicabilityofevidencefromprevioussystematicreviewsonimmunotherapyincurrentpracticeofchildhoodasthmatreatmentagradegradingofrecommendationsassessmentdevelopmentandevaluationsystematicreview
AT brandpaullp applicabilityofevidencefromprevioussystematicreviewsonimmunotherapyincurrentpracticeofchildhoodasthmatreatmentagradegradingofrecommendationsassessmentdevelopmentandevaluationsystematicreview