Cargando…
Why don’t key populations access HIV testing and counselling centres in Nepal? Findings based on national surveillance survey
OBJECTIVES: To assess the demographic, behavioural, psychosocial and structural factors associated with non-utilisation of HIV testing and counselling (HTC) services by female sex workers (FSWs) and men who have sex with men/transgender (MSM/TG). METHODS: This study involved a cross-sectional design...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29288177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017408 |
_version_ | 1783293145254985728 |
---|---|
author | Shrestha, Rachana Philip, Sairu Shewade, Hemant Deepak Rawal, Bir Deuba, Keshab |
author_facet | Shrestha, Rachana Philip, Sairu Shewade, Hemant Deepak Rawal, Bir Deuba, Keshab |
author_sort | Shrestha, Rachana |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess the demographic, behavioural, psychosocial and structural factors associated with non-utilisation of HIV testing and counselling (HTC) services by female sex workers (FSWs) and men who have sex with men/transgender (MSM/TG). METHODS: This study involved a cross-sectional design. We used the national surveillance survey data of 2012, which included 610 FSWs and 400 MSM/TG recruited randomly from 22 and three districts of Nepal, respectively. Adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using modified Poisson regression was used to assess and infer the association between outcome (non-utilisation of HTC in last year) and independent variables. RESULTS: Non-utilisation of HTC in the last year was 54% for FSWs and 55% for MSM/TG. The significant factors for non-utilisation of HTC among FSWs were depression (aPR=1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.6)), injectable drug abuse (ever) (aPR=1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.8)), participation (ever) in HIV awareness programmes (aPR=1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.4)), experience of forced sex in previous year (aPR=1.1 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.3)) and absence of dependents in the family (aPR=1.1 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.3)). Non-utilisation of HTC among MSM/TG had significant association with age 16–19 years (aPR=1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.7)), non-condom use (aPR=1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.4)), participation (ever) in HIV awareness programmes (aPR=1.6 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.0)), physical assault in previous year (aPR=1.8 (95% CI 1.0 to 3.1)), experience of forced sex in previous year (aPR=0.5 (95% CI 0.3 to 0.9)). CONCLUSION: Although limited by cross-sectional design, we found many programmatically relevant findings. Creative strategies should be envisaged for effective behavioural change communication to improve access to HIV testing. Psychosocial and structural interventions should be integrated with HIV prevention programmes to support key populations in accessing HIV testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5770839 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57708392018-01-19 Why don’t key populations access HIV testing and counselling centres in Nepal? Findings based on national surveillance survey Shrestha, Rachana Philip, Sairu Shewade, Hemant Deepak Rawal, Bir Deuba, Keshab BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To assess the demographic, behavioural, psychosocial and structural factors associated with non-utilisation of HIV testing and counselling (HTC) services by female sex workers (FSWs) and men who have sex with men/transgender (MSM/TG). METHODS: This study involved a cross-sectional design. We used the national surveillance survey data of 2012, which included 610 FSWs and 400 MSM/TG recruited randomly from 22 and three districts of Nepal, respectively. Adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using modified Poisson regression was used to assess and infer the association between outcome (non-utilisation of HTC in last year) and independent variables. RESULTS: Non-utilisation of HTC in the last year was 54% for FSWs and 55% for MSM/TG. The significant factors for non-utilisation of HTC among FSWs were depression (aPR=1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.6)), injectable drug abuse (ever) (aPR=1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.8)), participation (ever) in HIV awareness programmes (aPR=1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.4)), experience of forced sex in previous year (aPR=1.1 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.3)) and absence of dependents in the family (aPR=1.1 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.3)). Non-utilisation of HTC among MSM/TG had significant association with age 16–19 years (aPR=1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.7)), non-condom use (aPR=1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.4)), participation (ever) in HIV awareness programmes (aPR=1.6 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.0)), physical assault in previous year (aPR=1.8 (95% CI 1.0 to 3.1)), experience of forced sex in previous year (aPR=0.5 (95% CI 0.3 to 0.9)). CONCLUSION: Although limited by cross-sectional design, we found many programmatically relevant findings. Creative strategies should be envisaged for effective behavioural change communication to improve access to HIV testing. Psychosocial and structural interventions should be integrated with HIV prevention programmes to support key populations in accessing HIV testing. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5770839/ /pubmed/29288177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017408 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Public Health Shrestha, Rachana Philip, Sairu Shewade, Hemant Deepak Rawal, Bir Deuba, Keshab Why don’t key populations access HIV testing and counselling centres in Nepal? Findings based on national surveillance survey |
title | Why don’t key populations access HIV testing and counselling centres in Nepal? Findings based on national surveillance survey |
title_full | Why don’t key populations access HIV testing and counselling centres in Nepal? Findings based on national surveillance survey |
title_fullStr | Why don’t key populations access HIV testing and counselling centres in Nepal? Findings based on national surveillance survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Why don’t key populations access HIV testing and counselling centres in Nepal? Findings based on national surveillance survey |
title_short | Why don’t key populations access HIV testing and counselling centres in Nepal? Findings based on national surveillance survey |
title_sort | why don’t key populations access hiv testing and counselling centres in nepal? findings based on national surveillance survey |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29288177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017408 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shrestharachana whydontkeypopulationsaccesshivtestingandcounsellingcentresinnepalfindingsbasedonnationalsurveillancesurvey AT philipsairu whydontkeypopulationsaccesshivtestingandcounsellingcentresinnepalfindingsbasedonnationalsurveillancesurvey AT shewadehemantdeepak whydontkeypopulationsaccesshivtestingandcounsellingcentresinnepalfindingsbasedonnationalsurveillancesurvey AT rawalbir whydontkeypopulationsaccesshivtestingandcounsellingcentresinnepalfindingsbasedonnationalsurveillancesurvey AT deubakeshab whydontkeypopulationsaccesshivtestingandcounsellingcentresinnepalfindingsbasedonnationalsurveillancesurvey |