Cargando…

Why don’t key populations access HIV testing and counselling centres in Nepal? Findings based on national surveillance survey

OBJECTIVES: To assess the demographic, behavioural, psychosocial and structural factors associated with non-utilisation of HIV testing and counselling (HTC) services by female sex workers (FSWs) and men who have sex with men/transgender (MSM/TG). METHODS: This study involved a cross-sectional design...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shrestha, Rachana, Philip, Sairu, Shewade, Hemant Deepak, Rawal, Bir, Deuba, Keshab
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29288177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017408
_version_ 1783293145254985728
author Shrestha, Rachana
Philip, Sairu
Shewade, Hemant Deepak
Rawal, Bir
Deuba, Keshab
author_facet Shrestha, Rachana
Philip, Sairu
Shewade, Hemant Deepak
Rawal, Bir
Deuba, Keshab
author_sort Shrestha, Rachana
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the demographic, behavioural, psychosocial and structural factors associated with non-utilisation of HIV testing and counselling (HTC) services by female sex workers (FSWs) and men who have sex with men/transgender (MSM/TG). METHODS: This study involved a cross-sectional design. We used the national surveillance survey data of 2012, which included 610 FSWs and 400 MSM/TG recruited randomly from 22 and three districts of Nepal, respectively. Adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using modified Poisson regression was used to assess and infer the association between outcome (non-utilisation of HTC in last year) and independent variables. RESULTS: Non-utilisation of HTC in the last year was 54% for FSWs and 55% for MSM/TG. The significant factors for non-utilisation of HTC among FSWs were depression (aPR=1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.6)), injectable drug abuse (ever) (aPR=1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.8)), participation (ever) in HIV awareness programmes (aPR=1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.4)), experience of forced sex in previous year (aPR=1.1 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.3)) and absence of dependents in the family (aPR=1.1 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.3)). Non-utilisation of HTC among MSM/TG had significant association with age 16–19 years (aPR=1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.7)), non-condom use (aPR=1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.4)), participation (ever) in HIV awareness programmes (aPR=1.6 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.0)), physical assault in previous year (aPR=1.8 (95% CI 1.0 to 3.1)), experience of forced sex in previous year (aPR=0.5 (95% CI 0.3 to 0.9)). CONCLUSION: Although limited by cross-sectional design, we found many programmatically relevant findings. Creative strategies should be envisaged for effective behavioural change communication to improve access to HIV testing. Psychosocial and structural interventions should be integrated with HIV prevention programmes to support key populations in accessing HIV testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5770839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57708392018-01-19 Why don’t key populations access HIV testing and counselling centres in Nepal? Findings based on national surveillance survey Shrestha, Rachana Philip, Sairu Shewade, Hemant Deepak Rawal, Bir Deuba, Keshab BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To assess the demographic, behavioural, psychosocial and structural factors associated with non-utilisation of HIV testing and counselling (HTC) services by female sex workers (FSWs) and men who have sex with men/transgender (MSM/TG). METHODS: This study involved a cross-sectional design. We used the national surveillance survey data of 2012, which included 610 FSWs and 400 MSM/TG recruited randomly from 22 and three districts of Nepal, respectively. Adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using modified Poisson regression was used to assess and infer the association between outcome (non-utilisation of HTC in last year) and independent variables. RESULTS: Non-utilisation of HTC in the last year was 54% for FSWs and 55% for MSM/TG. The significant factors for non-utilisation of HTC among FSWs were depression (aPR=1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.6)), injectable drug abuse (ever) (aPR=1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.8)), participation (ever) in HIV awareness programmes (aPR=1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.4)), experience of forced sex in previous year (aPR=1.1 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.3)) and absence of dependents in the family (aPR=1.1 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.3)). Non-utilisation of HTC among MSM/TG had significant association with age 16–19 years (aPR=1.4 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.7)), non-condom use (aPR=1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.4)), participation (ever) in HIV awareness programmes (aPR=1.6 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.0)), physical assault in previous year (aPR=1.8 (95% CI 1.0 to 3.1)), experience of forced sex in previous year (aPR=0.5 (95% CI 0.3 to 0.9)). CONCLUSION: Although limited by cross-sectional design, we found many programmatically relevant findings. Creative strategies should be envisaged for effective behavioural change communication to improve access to HIV testing. Psychosocial and structural interventions should be integrated with HIV prevention programmes to support key populations in accessing HIV testing. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5770839/ /pubmed/29288177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017408 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Shrestha, Rachana
Philip, Sairu
Shewade, Hemant Deepak
Rawal, Bir
Deuba, Keshab
Why don’t key populations access HIV testing and counselling centres in Nepal? Findings based on national surveillance survey
title Why don’t key populations access HIV testing and counselling centres in Nepal? Findings based on national surveillance survey
title_full Why don’t key populations access HIV testing and counselling centres in Nepal? Findings based on national surveillance survey
title_fullStr Why don’t key populations access HIV testing and counselling centres in Nepal? Findings based on national surveillance survey
title_full_unstemmed Why don’t key populations access HIV testing and counselling centres in Nepal? Findings based on national surveillance survey
title_short Why don’t key populations access HIV testing and counselling centres in Nepal? Findings based on national surveillance survey
title_sort why don’t key populations access hiv testing and counselling centres in nepal? findings based on national surveillance survey
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29288177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017408
work_keys_str_mv AT shrestharachana whydontkeypopulationsaccesshivtestingandcounsellingcentresinnepalfindingsbasedonnationalsurveillancesurvey
AT philipsairu whydontkeypopulationsaccesshivtestingandcounsellingcentresinnepalfindingsbasedonnationalsurveillancesurvey
AT shewadehemantdeepak whydontkeypopulationsaccesshivtestingandcounsellingcentresinnepalfindingsbasedonnationalsurveillancesurvey
AT rawalbir whydontkeypopulationsaccesshivtestingandcounsellingcentresinnepalfindingsbasedonnationalsurveillancesurvey
AT deubakeshab whydontkeypopulationsaccesshivtestingandcounsellingcentresinnepalfindingsbasedonnationalsurveillancesurvey