Patient-prosthesis mismatch in patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation – predictors, incidence and impact on clinical efficacy. A preliminary study

INTRODUCTION: Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) is relatively frequent after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and negatively impacts prognosis. AIM: We sought to determine the frequency and clinical effects of PPM after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Overall, 238 patients who underwent TAVI were screened. Moderate PPM was defined as indexed effective orifice area (EOAi) between 0.65 and 0.85 cm(2)/m(2), and severe PPM as < 0.65 cm(2)/m(2). All-cause mortality and the Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 (VARC-2) defined composite of clinical efficacy at 1 year were the primary endpoints. RESULTS: Finally, 201 patients were included (mean age: 79.6 ±7.4 years, 52% females). The femoral artery served as the delivery route in 79% and most of the prostheses were self-expanding (68%). Any PPM was present in 48 (24%) subjects, and only 7 (3.5%) had severe PPM. Body surface area (BSA) independently predicted any PPM (OR = 16.9, p < 0.001) whereas post-dilation tended to protect against PPM (OR = 0.46, p = 0.09). All-cause mortality was similar in patients with moderate or severe PPM as compared to those with no PPM (14.6% vs. 14.3% vs. 13.1%, respectively, log-rank p = 0.98). Neither moderate (OR = 1.6, 95% CI: 0.8–3.2, p = 0.16) nor severe PPM (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 0.36–7.7, p = 0.51) had a significant impact on composite endpoint, or its elements, with the exception of transvalvular pressure gradient > 20 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: Severe PPM after TAVI is rare, can be predicted by larger BSA and does not seem to affect mid-term mortality or composite clinical outcome. Larger studies are needed to find different independent predictors of PPM and elucidate its impact in terms of device durability and long-term clinical efficacy.