Cargando…

Exercise response in Parkinson’s disease: insights from a cross-sectional comparison with sedentary controls and a per-protocol analysis of a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the acute and adaptation cardiovascular and metabolic training responses in people with Parkinson’s disease (pwP). DESIGN: (1) A cross-sectional study of exercise response of pwP compared with sedentary controls and (2) an interventional study of exercise training in pwP....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mavrommati, Foteini, Collett, Johnny, Franssen, Marloes, Meaney, Andy, Sexton, Claire, Dennis-West, Andrea, Betts, Jill F, Izadi, Hooshang, Bogdanovic, Marko, Tims, Martin, Farmer, Andrew, Dawes, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017194
_version_ 1783293161123086336
author Mavrommati, Foteini
Collett, Johnny
Franssen, Marloes
Meaney, Andy
Sexton, Claire
Dennis-West, Andrea
Betts, Jill F
Izadi, Hooshang
Bogdanovic, Marko
Tims, Martin
Farmer, Andrew
Dawes, Helen
author_facet Mavrommati, Foteini
Collett, Johnny
Franssen, Marloes
Meaney, Andy
Sexton, Claire
Dennis-West, Andrea
Betts, Jill F
Izadi, Hooshang
Bogdanovic, Marko
Tims, Martin
Farmer, Andrew
Dawes, Helen
author_sort Mavrommati, Foteini
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate the acute and adaptation cardiovascular and metabolic training responses in people with Parkinson’s disease (pwP). DESIGN: (1) A cross-sectional study of exercise response of pwP compared with sedentary controls and (2) an interventional study of exercise training in pwP. SETTING: Community leisure facilities. PARTICIPANTS: pwP (n=83) and sedentary controls (n=55). INTERVENTIONS: Study 1 included participants from a two-arm-parallel single-blind phase II randomised controlled trial (RCT), that undertook a baseline maximal incremental exercise test and study 2 included those randomised to the exercise group in the RCT, who completed a 6-month weekly exercise programme (n=37). The intervention study 2 was a prescribed exercise program consisting of sessions lasting 60 min, two times a week over a 6-month period. The control group followed the same protocol which derived the same cardiorespiratory parameters, except that they were instructed to aim for a cadence of ~60 revolutions per minute and the unloaded phase lasted 3 min with an initial step of 25 W. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Stepwise incremental exercise test to volitional exhaustion was the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: Study 1 showed higher maximum values for heart rate (HR), VO(2) L/min, VCO(2) L/min and ventilation L/min for the control group; respiratory exchange ratio (RER), perceived exertion and O(2) pulse (VO(2) L/min/HR) did not differ between groups. In study 2, for pwP who adhered to training (n=37), RER increased significantly and although there was no significant change in aerobic capacity or HR response, reduced blood pressure was found. CONCLUSIONS: An abnormal cardiovascular response to exercise was observed in pwP compared to controls. After the exercise programme, metabolic deficiencies remained for pwP. These observations add to the pathogenic understanding of PD, acknowledge an underling metabolic contribution and support that certain cardiovascular symptoms may improve as a result of this type of exercise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5770916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57709162018-01-19 Exercise response in Parkinson’s disease: insights from a cross-sectional comparison with sedentary controls and a per-protocol analysis of a randomised controlled trial Mavrommati, Foteini Collett, Johnny Franssen, Marloes Meaney, Andy Sexton, Claire Dennis-West, Andrea Betts, Jill F Izadi, Hooshang Bogdanovic, Marko Tims, Martin Farmer, Andrew Dawes, Helen BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine OBJECTIVES: To investigate the acute and adaptation cardiovascular and metabolic training responses in people with Parkinson’s disease (pwP). DESIGN: (1) A cross-sectional study of exercise response of pwP compared with sedentary controls and (2) an interventional study of exercise training in pwP. SETTING: Community leisure facilities. PARTICIPANTS: pwP (n=83) and sedentary controls (n=55). INTERVENTIONS: Study 1 included participants from a two-arm-parallel single-blind phase II randomised controlled trial (RCT), that undertook a baseline maximal incremental exercise test and study 2 included those randomised to the exercise group in the RCT, who completed a 6-month weekly exercise programme (n=37). The intervention study 2 was a prescribed exercise program consisting of sessions lasting 60 min, two times a week over a 6-month period. The control group followed the same protocol which derived the same cardiorespiratory parameters, except that they were instructed to aim for a cadence of ~60 revolutions per minute and the unloaded phase lasted 3 min with an initial step of 25 W. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Stepwise incremental exercise test to volitional exhaustion was the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: Study 1 showed higher maximum values for heart rate (HR), VO(2) L/min, VCO(2) L/min and ventilation L/min for the control group; respiratory exchange ratio (RER), perceived exertion and O(2) pulse (VO(2) L/min/HR) did not differ between groups. In study 2, for pwP who adhered to training (n=37), RER increased significantly and although there was no significant change in aerobic capacity or HR response, reduced blood pressure was found. CONCLUSIONS: An abnormal cardiovascular response to exercise was observed in pwP compared to controls. After the exercise programme, metabolic deficiencies remained for pwP. These observations add to the pathogenic understanding of PD, acknowledge an underling metabolic contribution and support that certain cardiovascular symptoms may improve as a result of this type of exercise. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5770916/ /pubmed/29282259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017194 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Mavrommati, Foteini
Collett, Johnny
Franssen, Marloes
Meaney, Andy
Sexton, Claire
Dennis-West, Andrea
Betts, Jill F
Izadi, Hooshang
Bogdanovic, Marko
Tims, Martin
Farmer, Andrew
Dawes, Helen
Exercise response in Parkinson’s disease: insights from a cross-sectional comparison with sedentary controls and a per-protocol analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title Exercise response in Parkinson’s disease: insights from a cross-sectional comparison with sedentary controls and a per-protocol analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_full Exercise response in Parkinson’s disease: insights from a cross-sectional comparison with sedentary controls and a per-protocol analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Exercise response in Parkinson’s disease: insights from a cross-sectional comparison with sedentary controls and a per-protocol analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Exercise response in Parkinson’s disease: insights from a cross-sectional comparison with sedentary controls and a per-protocol analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_short Exercise response in Parkinson’s disease: insights from a cross-sectional comparison with sedentary controls and a per-protocol analysis of a randomised controlled trial
title_sort exercise response in parkinson’s disease: insights from a cross-sectional comparison with sedentary controls and a per-protocol analysis of a randomised controlled trial
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017194
work_keys_str_mv AT mavrommatifoteini exerciseresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseinsightsfromacrosssectionalcomparisonwithsedentarycontrolsandaperprotocolanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT collettjohnny exerciseresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseinsightsfromacrosssectionalcomparisonwithsedentarycontrolsandaperprotocolanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT franssenmarloes exerciseresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseinsightsfromacrosssectionalcomparisonwithsedentarycontrolsandaperprotocolanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT meaneyandy exerciseresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseinsightsfromacrosssectionalcomparisonwithsedentarycontrolsandaperprotocolanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sextonclaire exerciseresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseinsightsfromacrosssectionalcomparisonwithsedentarycontrolsandaperprotocolanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT denniswestandrea exerciseresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseinsightsfromacrosssectionalcomparisonwithsedentarycontrolsandaperprotocolanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bettsjillf exerciseresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseinsightsfromacrosssectionalcomparisonwithsedentarycontrolsandaperprotocolanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT izadihooshang exerciseresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseinsightsfromacrosssectionalcomparisonwithsedentarycontrolsandaperprotocolanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bogdanovicmarko exerciseresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseinsightsfromacrosssectionalcomparisonwithsedentarycontrolsandaperprotocolanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT timsmartin exerciseresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseinsightsfromacrosssectionalcomparisonwithsedentarycontrolsandaperprotocolanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT farmerandrew exerciseresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseinsightsfromacrosssectionalcomparisonwithsedentarycontrolsandaperprotocolanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT daweshelen exerciseresponseinparkinsonsdiseaseinsightsfromacrosssectionalcomparisonwithsedentarycontrolsandaperprotocolanalysisofarandomisedcontrolledtrial