Cargando…

Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of five common tumour biomarkers and CA19-9 for pancreatic cancer: a protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

INTRODUCTION: Surgical resection is the only curative treatment for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Unfortunately, 80%–85% of patients present with locally advanced or metastatic unresectable pancreatic cancer at the time of diagnosis. Detection of pancreatic cancer at early stages remai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ge, Long, Pan, Bei, Song, Fujian, Ma, Jichun, Zeraatkar, Dena, Zhou, Jianguo, Tian, Jinhui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018175
_version_ 1783293171885670400
author Ge, Long
Pan, Bei
Song, Fujian
Ma, Jichun
Zeraatkar, Dena
Zhou, Jianguo
Tian, Jinhui
author_facet Ge, Long
Pan, Bei
Song, Fujian
Ma, Jichun
Zeraatkar, Dena
Zhou, Jianguo
Tian, Jinhui
author_sort Ge, Long
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Surgical resection is the only curative treatment for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Unfortunately, 80%–85% of patients present with locally advanced or metastatic unresectable pancreatic cancer at the time of diagnosis. Detection of pancreatic cancer at early stages remains a great challenge due to lack of accurate detection tests. Recommendations in existing clinical practice guidelines on early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer are inconsistent and based on limited evidence. Most of them endorse measuring serum CA19-9 as a complementary test, but also state that it is not recommended for diagnosing early pancreatic cancer. There are currently no other tumour-specific markers recommended for diagnosing early pancreatic cancer. This study aims to evaluate and compare the accuracy of five common tumour biomarkers (CA242, carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA)), CA125, microRNAs and K-ras gene mutation) and CA19-9 and their combinations for diagnosing pancreatic cancer using network meta-analysis method, and to rank these tests using a superiority index. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be searched from inception to April 2017. The search will include the above-mentioned tumour biomarkers for diagnosing pancreatic cancer, including CA19-9. The risk of bias for each study will be independently assessed as low, moderate or high using criteria adapted from the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. Network meta-analysis will be performed using STATA V.12.0 and R software V.3.4.1. The competing diagnostic tests will be ranked by a superiority index. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval and patient consent are not required since this study is a network meta-analysis based on published studies. The results of this network meta-analysis will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017064627.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5770961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57709612018-01-19 Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of five common tumour biomarkers and CA19-9 for pancreatic cancer: a protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy Ge, Long Pan, Bei Song, Fujian Ma, Jichun Zeraatkar, Dena Zhou, Jianguo Tian, Jinhui BMJ Open Oncology INTRODUCTION: Surgical resection is the only curative treatment for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Unfortunately, 80%–85% of patients present with locally advanced or metastatic unresectable pancreatic cancer at the time of diagnosis. Detection of pancreatic cancer at early stages remains a great challenge due to lack of accurate detection tests. Recommendations in existing clinical practice guidelines on early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer are inconsistent and based on limited evidence. Most of them endorse measuring serum CA19-9 as a complementary test, but also state that it is not recommended for diagnosing early pancreatic cancer. There are currently no other tumour-specific markers recommended for diagnosing early pancreatic cancer. This study aims to evaluate and compare the accuracy of five common tumour biomarkers (CA242, carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA)), CA125, microRNAs and K-ras gene mutation) and CA19-9 and their combinations for diagnosing pancreatic cancer using network meta-analysis method, and to rank these tests using a superiority index. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be searched from inception to April 2017. The search will include the above-mentioned tumour biomarkers for diagnosing pancreatic cancer, including CA19-9. The risk of bias for each study will be independently assessed as low, moderate or high using criteria adapted from the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. Network meta-analysis will be performed using STATA V.12.0 and R software V.3.4.1. The competing diagnostic tests will be ranked by a superiority index. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval and patient consent are not required since this study is a network meta-analysis based on published studies. The results of this network meta-analysis will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017064627. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-12-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5770961/ /pubmed/29282264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018175 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Oncology
Ge, Long
Pan, Bei
Song, Fujian
Ma, Jichun
Zeraatkar, Dena
Zhou, Jianguo
Tian, Jinhui
Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of five common tumour biomarkers and CA19-9 for pancreatic cancer: a protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
title Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of five common tumour biomarkers and CA19-9 for pancreatic cancer: a protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
title_full Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of five common tumour biomarkers and CA19-9 for pancreatic cancer: a protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
title_fullStr Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of five common tumour biomarkers and CA19-9 for pancreatic cancer: a protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of five common tumour biomarkers and CA19-9 for pancreatic cancer: a protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
title_short Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of five common tumour biomarkers and CA19-9 for pancreatic cancer: a protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
title_sort comparing the diagnostic accuracy of five common tumour biomarkers and ca19-9 for pancreatic cancer: a protocol for a network meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29282264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018175
work_keys_str_mv AT gelong comparingthediagnosticaccuracyoffivecommontumourbiomarkersandca199forpancreaticcanceraprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT panbei comparingthediagnosticaccuracyoffivecommontumourbiomarkersandca199forpancreaticcanceraprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT songfujian comparingthediagnosticaccuracyoffivecommontumourbiomarkersandca199forpancreaticcanceraprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT majichun comparingthediagnosticaccuracyoffivecommontumourbiomarkersandca199forpancreaticcanceraprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT zeraatkardena comparingthediagnosticaccuracyoffivecommontumourbiomarkersandca199forpancreaticcanceraprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT zhoujianguo comparingthediagnosticaccuracyoffivecommontumourbiomarkersandca199forpancreaticcanceraprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT tianjinhui comparingthediagnosticaccuracyoffivecommontumourbiomarkersandca199forpancreaticcanceraprotocolforanetworkmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy