Cargando…
Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Occlusion Effect
INTRODUCTION: The currently available methods for measuring the occlusion effect (OE) of hearing protection devices (HPDs) have limitations. Objective microphonic measurements do not assess bone-conducted sounds directly transmitted to the cochlea. Psychophysical measurements at threshold are biased...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5771060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29319012 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_13_17 |
_version_ | 1783293189952634880 |
---|---|
author | Valentin, Olivier Laville, Frédéric |
author_facet | Valentin, Olivier Laville, Frédéric |
author_sort | Valentin, Olivier |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The currently available methods for measuring the occlusion effect (OE) of hearing protection devices (HPDs) have limitations. Objective microphonic measurements do not assess bone-conducted sounds directly transmitted to the cochlea. Psychophysical measurements at threshold are biased due to the low-frequency masking effects from test participants’ physiological noise and the variability of measurements based on subjective responses. An auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) procedure is used as a technique that might overcome these limitations. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Pure-tone stimuli (250 and 500 Hz), with amplitude modulated at 40 Hz, were presented to twelve adults with normal hearing through a bone vibrator at three levels in 10-dB steps. The following two conditions were assessed: the unoccluded ear canal and occluded ear canal. ASSR amplitude data as a function of the stimulation level were linearized using least-square regressions. The ASSR-based “physiological” OE was then calculated as the average difference between the two measurements. RESULTS: A significant statistical difference was found between the average threshold-based psychophysical OE and the average ASSR-based OE. CONCLUSION: This study successfully ascertained that it is possible to objectively measure the OE of HPD using ASSRs collected on the same participant both with and without protectors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5771060 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57710602018-02-02 Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Occlusion Effect Valentin, Olivier Laville, Frédéric Noise Health Original Article INTRODUCTION: The currently available methods for measuring the occlusion effect (OE) of hearing protection devices (HPDs) have limitations. Objective microphonic measurements do not assess bone-conducted sounds directly transmitted to the cochlea. Psychophysical measurements at threshold are biased due to the low-frequency masking effects from test participants’ physiological noise and the variability of measurements based on subjective responses. An auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) procedure is used as a technique that might overcome these limitations. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Pure-tone stimuli (250 and 500 Hz), with amplitude modulated at 40 Hz, were presented to twelve adults with normal hearing through a bone vibrator at three levels in 10-dB steps. The following two conditions were assessed: the unoccluded ear canal and occluded ear canal. ASSR amplitude data as a function of the stimulation level were linearized using least-square regressions. The ASSR-based “physiological” OE was then calculated as the average difference between the two measurements. RESULTS: A significant statistical difference was found between the average threshold-based psychophysical OE and the average ASSR-based OE. CONCLUSION: This study successfully ascertained that it is possible to objectively measure the OE of HPD using ASSRs collected on the same participant both with and without protectors. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5771060/ /pubmed/29319012 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_13_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Noise & Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Valentin, Olivier Laville, Frédéric Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Occlusion Effect |
title | Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Occlusion Effect |
title_full | Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Occlusion Effect |
title_fullStr | Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Occlusion Effect |
title_full_unstemmed | Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Occlusion Effect |
title_short | Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Occlusion Effect |
title_sort | using auditory steady-state responses for measuring hearing protector occlusion effect |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5771060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29319012 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_13_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT valentinolivier usingauditorysteadystateresponsesformeasuringhearingprotectorocclusioneffect AT lavillefrederic usingauditorysteadystateresponsesformeasuringhearingprotectorocclusioneffect |