Cargando…

Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Occlusion Effect

INTRODUCTION: The currently available methods for measuring the occlusion effect (OE) of hearing protection devices (HPDs) have limitations. Objective microphonic measurements do not assess bone-conducted sounds directly transmitted to the cochlea. Psychophysical measurements at threshold are biased...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valentin, Olivier, Laville, Frédéric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5771060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29319012
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_13_17
_version_ 1783293189952634880
author Valentin, Olivier
Laville, Frédéric
author_facet Valentin, Olivier
Laville, Frédéric
author_sort Valentin, Olivier
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The currently available methods for measuring the occlusion effect (OE) of hearing protection devices (HPDs) have limitations. Objective microphonic measurements do not assess bone-conducted sounds directly transmitted to the cochlea. Psychophysical measurements at threshold are biased due to the low-frequency masking effects from test participants’ physiological noise and the variability of measurements based on subjective responses. An auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) procedure is used as a technique that might overcome these limitations. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Pure-tone stimuli (250 and 500 Hz), with amplitude modulated at 40 Hz, were presented to twelve adults with normal hearing through a bone vibrator at three levels in 10-dB steps. The following two conditions were assessed: the unoccluded ear canal and occluded ear canal. ASSR amplitude data as a function of the stimulation level were linearized using least-square regressions. The ASSR-based “physiological” OE was then calculated as the average difference between the two measurements. RESULTS: A significant statistical difference was found between the average threshold-based psychophysical OE and the average ASSR-based OE. CONCLUSION: This study successfully ascertained that it is possible to objectively measure the OE of HPD using ASSRs collected on the same participant both with and without protectors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5771060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57710602018-02-02 Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Occlusion Effect Valentin, Olivier Laville, Frédéric Noise Health Original Article INTRODUCTION: The currently available methods for measuring the occlusion effect (OE) of hearing protection devices (HPDs) have limitations. Objective microphonic measurements do not assess bone-conducted sounds directly transmitted to the cochlea. Psychophysical measurements at threshold are biased due to the low-frequency masking effects from test participants’ physiological noise and the variability of measurements based on subjective responses. An auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) procedure is used as a technique that might overcome these limitations. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Pure-tone stimuli (250 and 500 Hz), with amplitude modulated at 40 Hz, were presented to twelve adults with normal hearing through a bone vibrator at three levels in 10-dB steps. The following two conditions were assessed: the unoccluded ear canal and occluded ear canal. ASSR amplitude data as a function of the stimulation level were linearized using least-square regressions. The ASSR-based “physiological” OE was then calculated as the average difference between the two measurements. RESULTS: A significant statistical difference was found between the average threshold-based psychophysical OE and the average ASSR-based OE. CONCLUSION: This study successfully ascertained that it is possible to objectively measure the OE of HPD using ASSRs collected on the same participant both with and without protectors. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5771060/ /pubmed/29319012 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_13_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Noise & Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Valentin, Olivier
Laville, Frédéric
Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Occlusion Effect
title Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Occlusion Effect
title_full Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Occlusion Effect
title_fullStr Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Occlusion Effect
title_full_unstemmed Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Occlusion Effect
title_short Using Auditory Steady-State Responses for Measuring Hearing Protector Occlusion Effect
title_sort using auditory steady-state responses for measuring hearing protector occlusion effect
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5771060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29319012
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/nah.NAH_13_17
work_keys_str_mv AT valentinolivier usingauditorysteadystateresponsesformeasuringhearingprotectorocclusioneffect
AT lavillefrederic usingauditorysteadystateresponsesformeasuringhearingprotectorocclusioneffect