Cargando…

Percutaneous cholecystostomy for delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: analysis of a single-centre experience and literature review

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) has been used as a relatively safe and efficient temporising measure in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (AC) in high-risk patients with serious co-morbidity and in elderly patients. AIM: To assess the effectiveness, possible advantages, and compli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamer, Erdinc, Cengiz, Fevzi, Cakir, Volkan, Balli, Omur, Acar, Turan, Peskersoy, Mustafa, Haciyanli, Mehmet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5771448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29358993
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pg.2017.72098
_version_ 1783293264831447040
author Kamer, Erdinc
Cengiz, Fevzi
Cakir, Volkan
Balli, Omur
Acar, Turan
Peskersoy, Mustafa
Haciyanli, Mehmet
author_facet Kamer, Erdinc
Cengiz, Fevzi
Cakir, Volkan
Balli, Omur
Acar, Turan
Peskersoy, Mustafa
Haciyanli, Mehmet
author_sort Kamer, Erdinc
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) has been used as a relatively safe and efficient temporising measure in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (AC) in high-risk patients with serious co-morbidity and in elderly patients. AIM: To assess the effectiveness, possible advantages, and complication of delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) following PC in patients with AC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 52 LC for AC were divided into two groups: the first group consisted of patients who had PC followed by LC (PCLC group, n = 12), and the second group consisted of patients who had conservative treatment followed by LC (non-PCLC group, n = 40). Eight of these patients were males and four were female. The groups were statistically compared regarding their demographic, comorbidity, hospital stay, conservation, and complication rates. PC was performed via the transhepatic route under ultrasound guidance using local anaesthesia. RESULTS: Percutaneous cholecystostomy was technically successful in 12 patients with no attributable mortality or major complications. Upon the regression of cholecystitis and the decrease in APACHE-II scores, the PC catheter was unplugged and elective LC was scheduled for after 8 weeks. Ninety-two percent had complete resolution of symptoms within 48 h of intervention while 8% had partial resolution. All of the patients in PCLC and non-PCLC groups recovered well from cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that PCLC would not significantly improve the outcome of LC as assessed by conversion and morbidity rate and hospital stay compared with non-PCLC. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is a valid alternative for patients with acute cholecystitis. And our study shows that the laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a good option in high-risk patients who have been treated by percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5771448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57714482018-01-22 Percutaneous cholecystostomy for delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: analysis of a single-centre experience and literature review Kamer, Erdinc Cengiz, Fevzi Cakir, Volkan Balli, Omur Acar, Turan Peskersoy, Mustafa Haciyanli, Mehmet Prz Gastroenterol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) has been used as a relatively safe and efficient temporising measure in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (AC) in high-risk patients with serious co-morbidity and in elderly patients. AIM: To assess the effectiveness, possible advantages, and complication of delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) following PC in patients with AC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 52 LC for AC were divided into two groups: the first group consisted of patients who had PC followed by LC (PCLC group, n = 12), and the second group consisted of patients who had conservative treatment followed by LC (non-PCLC group, n = 40). Eight of these patients were males and four were female. The groups were statistically compared regarding their demographic, comorbidity, hospital stay, conservation, and complication rates. PC was performed via the transhepatic route under ultrasound guidance using local anaesthesia. RESULTS: Percutaneous cholecystostomy was technically successful in 12 patients with no attributable mortality or major complications. Upon the regression of cholecystitis and the decrease in APACHE-II scores, the PC catheter was unplugged and elective LC was scheduled for after 8 weeks. Ninety-two percent had complete resolution of symptoms within 48 h of intervention while 8% had partial resolution. All of the patients in PCLC and non-PCLC groups recovered well from cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that PCLC would not significantly improve the outcome of LC as assessed by conversion and morbidity rate and hospital stay compared with non-PCLC. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is a valid alternative for patients with acute cholecystitis. And our study shows that the laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a good option in high-risk patients who have been treated by percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis. Termedia Publishing House 2017-12-14 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5771448/ /pubmed/29358993 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pg.2017.72098 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kamer, Erdinc
Cengiz, Fevzi
Cakir, Volkan
Balli, Omur
Acar, Turan
Peskersoy, Mustafa
Haciyanli, Mehmet
Percutaneous cholecystostomy for delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: analysis of a single-centre experience and literature review
title Percutaneous cholecystostomy for delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: analysis of a single-centre experience and literature review
title_full Percutaneous cholecystostomy for delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: analysis of a single-centre experience and literature review
title_fullStr Percutaneous cholecystostomy for delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: analysis of a single-centre experience and literature review
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous cholecystostomy for delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: analysis of a single-centre experience and literature review
title_short Percutaneous cholecystostomy for delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: analysis of a single-centre experience and literature review
title_sort percutaneous cholecystostomy for delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: analysis of a single-centre experience and literature review
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5771448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29358993
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pg.2017.72098
work_keys_str_mv AT kamererdinc percutaneouscholecystostomyfordelayedlaparoscopiccholecystectomyinpatientswithacutecholecystitisanalysisofasinglecentreexperienceandliteraturereview
AT cengizfevzi percutaneouscholecystostomyfordelayedlaparoscopiccholecystectomyinpatientswithacutecholecystitisanalysisofasinglecentreexperienceandliteraturereview
AT cakirvolkan percutaneouscholecystostomyfordelayedlaparoscopiccholecystectomyinpatientswithacutecholecystitisanalysisofasinglecentreexperienceandliteraturereview
AT balliomur percutaneouscholecystostomyfordelayedlaparoscopiccholecystectomyinpatientswithacutecholecystitisanalysisofasinglecentreexperienceandliteraturereview
AT acarturan percutaneouscholecystostomyfordelayedlaparoscopiccholecystectomyinpatientswithacutecholecystitisanalysisofasinglecentreexperienceandliteraturereview
AT peskersoymustafa percutaneouscholecystostomyfordelayedlaparoscopiccholecystectomyinpatientswithacutecholecystitisanalysisofasinglecentreexperienceandliteraturereview
AT haciyanlimehmet percutaneouscholecystostomyfordelayedlaparoscopiccholecystectomyinpatientswithacutecholecystitisanalysisofasinglecentreexperienceandliteraturereview