Cargando…

Desvenlafaxine Versus Placebo in a Fluoxetine-Referenced Study of Children and Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder

Objectives: To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine (25–50 mg/d) compared with placebo in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods: Outpatient children (7–11 years) and adolescents (12–17 years) who met DSM-IV-TR criteria for MDD and had screeni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weihs, Karen L., Murphy, William, Abbas, Richat, Chiles, Deborah, England, Richard D., Ramaker, Sara, Wajsbrot, Dalia B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5771543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29189044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cap.2017.0100
_version_ 1783293273191743488
author Weihs, Karen L.
Murphy, William
Abbas, Richat
Chiles, Deborah
England, Richard D.
Ramaker, Sara
Wajsbrot, Dalia B.
author_facet Weihs, Karen L.
Murphy, William
Abbas, Richat
Chiles, Deborah
England, Richard D.
Ramaker, Sara
Wajsbrot, Dalia B.
author_sort Weihs, Karen L.
collection PubMed
description Objectives: To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine (25–50 mg/d) compared with placebo in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods: Outpatient children (7–11 years) and adolescents (12–17 years) who met DSM-IV-TR criteria for MDD and had screening and baseline Children's Depression Rating Scale–Revised (CDRS-R) total scores >40 were randomly assigned to 8-week treatment with placebo, desvenlafaxine (25, 35, or 50 mg/d based on baseline weight), or fluoxetine (20 mg/d). The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in CDRS-R total score at week 8, analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. Secondary efficacy endpoints included week 8 Clinical Global Impressions–Severity, Clinical Global Impressions–Improvement (CGI-I), and response (CGI-I ≤ 2). Safety assessments included adverse events, physical and vital sign measurements, laboratory evaluations, electrocardiogram, and the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Results: The safety population included 339 patients (children, n = 130; adolescents, n = 209). The primary endpoint, change from baseline in CDRS-R total score at week 8, did not statistically separate from placebo, for either desvenlafaxine (adjusted mean [standard error] change, −22.6 [1.17]) or fluoxetine (−24.8 [1.17]; placebo, −23.1 [1.18]). Week 8 CGI-I response rates were significantly greater for fluoxetine (78.2%; p = 0.017) than for placebo (62.6%); desvenlafaxine (68.7%) did not differ from placebo. Other secondary outcomes were consistent with those obtained with CDRS-R. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable among treatment groups (desvenlafaxine, 60.0%; placebo, 70.5%; and fluoxetine, 64.3%). Conclusion: Desvenlafaxine did not demonstrate efficacy for treating MDD in children and adolescents in this trial. Because neither desvenlafaxine nor the reference medication, fluoxetine, demonstrated a statistically significant difference from placebo on the primary endpoint, this was considered a failed trial and no efficacy conclusions can be drawn. Desvenlafaxine 25–50 mg/d was generally safe and well tolerated in children and adolescents in this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5771543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57715432018-02-01 Desvenlafaxine Versus Placebo in a Fluoxetine-Referenced Study of Children and Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder Weihs, Karen L. Murphy, William Abbas, Richat Chiles, Deborah England, Richard D. Ramaker, Sara Wajsbrot, Dalia B. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Original Articles Objectives: To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine (25–50 mg/d) compared with placebo in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods: Outpatient children (7–11 years) and adolescents (12–17 years) who met DSM-IV-TR criteria for MDD and had screening and baseline Children's Depression Rating Scale–Revised (CDRS-R) total scores >40 were randomly assigned to 8-week treatment with placebo, desvenlafaxine (25, 35, or 50 mg/d based on baseline weight), or fluoxetine (20 mg/d). The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline in CDRS-R total score at week 8, analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. Secondary efficacy endpoints included week 8 Clinical Global Impressions–Severity, Clinical Global Impressions–Improvement (CGI-I), and response (CGI-I ≤ 2). Safety assessments included adverse events, physical and vital sign measurements, laboratory evaluations, electrocardiogram, and the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Results: The safety population included 339 patients (children, n = 130; adolescents, n = 209). The primary endpoint, change from baseline in CDRS-R total score at week 8, did not statistically separate from placebo, for either desvenlafaxine (adjusted mean [standard error] change, −22.6 [1.17]) or fluoxetine (−24.8 [1.17]; placebo, −23.1 [1.18]). Week 8 CGI-I response rates were significantly greater for fluoxetine (78.2%; p = 0.017) than for placebo (62.6%); desvenlafaxine (68.7%) did not differ from placebo. Other secondary outcomes were consistent with those obtained with CDRS-R. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable among treatment groups (desvenlafaxine, 60.0%; placebo, 70.5%; and fluoxetine, 64.3%). Conclusion: Desvenlafaxine did not demonstrate efficacy for treating MDD in children and adolescents in this trial. Because neither desvenlafaxine nor the reference medication, fluoxetine, demonstrated a statistically significant difference from placebo on the primary endpoint, this was considered a failed trial and no efficacy conclusions can be drawn. Desvenlafaxine 25–50 mg/d was generally safe and well tolerated in children and adolescents in this study. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2018-02-01 2018-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5771543/ /pubmed/29189044 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cap.2017.0100 Text en © Karen L. Weihs et al. 2017; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This article is available under the Creative Commons License CC-BY-NC (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0). This license permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Permission only needs to be obtained for commercial use and can be done via RightsLink.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Weihs, Karen L.
Murphy, William
Abbas, Richat
Chiles, Deborah
England, Richard D.
Ramaker, Sara
Wajsbrot, Dalia B.
Desvenlafaxine Versus Placebo in a Fluoxetine-Referenced Study of Children and Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder
title Desvenlafaxine Versus Placebo in a Fluoxetine-Referenced Study of Children and Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder
title_full Desvenlafaxine Versus Placebo in a Fluoxetine-Referenced Study of Children and Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder
title_fullStr Desvenlafaxine Versus Placebo in a Fluoxetine-Referenced Study of Children and Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder
title_full_unstemmed Desvenlafaxine Versus Placebo in a Fluoxetine-Referenced Study of Children and Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder
title_short Desvenlafaxine Versus Placebo in a Fluoxetine-Referenced Study of Children and Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder
title_sort desvenlafaxine versus placebo in a fluoxetine-referenced study of children and adolescents with major depressive disorder
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5771543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29189044
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cap.2017.0100
work_keys_str_mv AT weihskarenl desvenlafaxineversusplaceboinafluoxetinereferencedstudyofchildrenandadolescentswithmajordepressivedisorder
AT murphywilliam desvenlafaxineversusplaceboinafluoxetinereferencedstudyofchildrenandadolescentswithmajordepressivedisorder
AT abbasrichat desvenlafaxineversusplaceboinafluoxetinereferencedstudyofchildrenandadolescentswithmajordepressivedisorder
AT chilesdeborah desvenlafaxineversusplaceboinafluoxetinereferencedstudyofchildrenandadolescentswithmajordepressivedisorder
AT englandrichardd desvenlafaxineversusplaceboinafluoxetinereferencedstudyofchildrenandadolescentswithmajordepressivedisorder
AT ramakersara desvenlafaxineversusplaceboinafluoxetinereferencedstudyofchildrenandadolescentswithmajordepressivedisorder
AT wajsbrotdaliab desvenlafaxineversusplaceboinafluoxetinereferencedstudyofchildrenandadolescentswithmajordepressivedisorder