Cargando…
How do the outcomes of the DEKA Arm compare to conventional prostheses?
OBJECTIVES: Objectives were to 1) compare self-reported function, dexterity, activity performance, quality of life and community integration of the DEKA Arm to conventional prostheses; and 2) examine differences in outcomes by conventional prosthesis type, terminal device type and by DEKA Arm config...
Autores principales: | Resnik, Linda J., Borgia, Matthew L., Acluche, Frantzy, Cancio, Jill M., Latlief, Gail, Sasson, Nicole |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5771605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29342217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191326 |
Ejemplares similares
-
EMG pattern recognition compared to foot control of the DEKA Arm
por: Resnik, Linda J., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Perceptions of satisfaction, usability and desirability of the DEKA Arm before and after a trial of home use
por: Resnik, Linda J., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
User experience of controlling the DEKA Arm with EMG pattern recognition
por: Resnik, Linda J., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Use of the DEKA Arm for amputees with brachial plexus injury: A case series
por: Resnik, Linda, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Comparison of DEKA Arm and Body-Powered Upper Limb Prosthesis Joint Kinematics
por: Bloomer, Conor, et al.
Publicado: (2020)