Cargando…

Preference evaluation of ground beef by untrained subjects with three levels of finely textured beef

After receiving bad publicity in 2012 and being removed from many ground beef products, finely textured beef (referred to as ‘pink slime’ by some) is making a comeback. Some of its proponents argue that consumers prefer ground beef containing finely textured beef, but no objective scientific party h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Depue, Sandra Molly, Neilson, Morgan Marie, Lusk, Jayson L., Mafi, Gretchen, Norwood, F. Bailey, Ramanathan, Ranjith, VanOverbeke, Deborah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5771606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29342174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190680
_version_ 1783293286535921664
author Depue, Sandra Molly
Neilson, Morgan Marie
Lusk, Jayson L.
Mafi, Gretchen
Norwood, F. Bailey
Ramanathan, Ranjith
VanOverbeke, Deborah
author_facet Depue, Sandra Molly
Neilson, Morgan Marie
Lusk, Jayson L.
Mafi, Gretchen
Norwood, F. Bailey
Ramanathan, Ranjith
VanOverbeke, Deborah
author_sort Depue, Sandra Molly
collection PubMed
description After receiving bad publicity in 2012 and being removed from many ground beef products, finely textured beef (referred to as ‘pink slime’ by some) is making a comeback. Some of its proponents argue that consumers prefer ground beef containing finely textured beef, but no objective scientific party has tested this claim—that is the purpose of the present study. Over 200 untrained subjects participated in a sensory analysis in which they tasted one ground beef sample with no finely textured beef, another with 15% finely textured beef (by weight), and another with more than 15%. Beef with 15% finely textured beef has an improved juiciness (p < 0.01) and tenderness (p < 0.01) quality. However, subjects rate the flavor-liking and overall likeability the same regardless of the finely textured beef content. Moreover, when the three beef types are consumed as part of a slider (small hamburger), subjects are indifferent to the level of finely textured beef.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5771606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57716062018-01-23 Preference evaluation of ground beef by untrained subjects with three levels of finely textured beef Depue, Sandra Molly Neilson, Morgan Marie Lusk, Jayson L. Mafi, Gretchen Norwood, F. Bailey Ramanathan, Ranjith VanOverbeke, Deborah PLoS One Research Article After receiving bad publicity in 2012 and being removed from many ground beef products, finely textured beef (referred to as ‘pink slime’ by some) is making a comeback. Some of its proponents argue that consumers prefer ground beef containing finely textured beef, but no objective scientific party has tested this claim—that is the purpose of the present study. Over 200 untrained subjects participated in a sensory analysis in which they tasted one ground beef sample with no finely textured beef, another with 15% finely textured beef (by weight), and another with more than 15%. Beef with 15% finely textured beef has an improved juiciness (p < 0.01) and tenderness (p < 0.01) quality. However, subjects rate the flavor-liking and overall likeability the same regardless of the finely textured beef content. Moreover, when the three beef types are consumed as part of a slider (small hamburger), subjects are indifferent to the level of finely textured beef. Public Library of Science 2018-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5771606/ /pubmed/29342174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190680 Text en © 2018 Depue et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Depue, Sandra Molly
Neilson, Morgan Marie
Lusk, Jayson L.
Mafi, Gretchen
Norwood, F. Bailey
Ramanathan, Ranjith
VanOverbeke, Deborah
Preference evaluation of ground beef by untrained subjects with three levels of finely textured beef
title Preference evaluation of ground beef by untrained subjects with three levels of finely textured beef
title_full Preference evaluation of ground beef by untrained subjects with three levels of finely textured beef
title_fullStr Preference evaluation of ground beef by untrained subjects with three levels of finely textured beef
title_full_unstemmed Preference evaluation of ground beef by untrained subjects with three levels of finely textured beef
title_short Preference evaluation of ground beef by untrained subjects with three levels of finely textured beef
title_sort preference evaluation of ground beef by untrained subjects with three levels of finely textured beef
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5771606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29342174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190680
work_keys_str_mv AT depuesandramolly preferenceevaluationofgroundbeefbyuntrainedsubjectswiththreelevelsoffinelytexturedbeef
AT neilsonmorganmarie preferenceevaluationofgroundbeefbyuntrainedsubjectswiththreelevelsoffinelytexturedbeef
AT luskjaysonl preferenceevaluationofgroundbeefbyuntrainedsubjectswiththreelevelsoffinelytexturedbeef
AT mafigretchen preferenceevaluationofgroundbeefbyuntrainedsubjectswiththreelevelsoffinelytexturedbeef
AT norwoodfbailey preferenceevaluationofgroundbeefbyuntrainedsubjectswiththreelevelsoffinelytexturedbeef
AT ramanathanranjith preferenceevaluationofgroundbeefbyuntrainedsubjectswiththreelevelsoffinelytexturedbeef
AT vanoverbekedeborah preferenceevaluationofgroundbeefbyuntrainedsubjectswiththreelevelsoffinelytexturedbeef