Cargando…
Preference evaluation of ground beef by untrained subjects with three levels of finely textured beef
After receiving bad publicity in 2012 and being removed from many ground beef products, finely textured beef (referred to as ‘pink slime’ by some) is making a comeback. Some of its proponents argue that consumers prefer ground beef containing finely textured beef, but no objective scientific party h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5771606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29342174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190680 |
_version_ | 1783293286535921664 |
---|---|
author | Depue, Sandra Molly Neilson, Morgan Marie Lusk, Jayson L. Mafi, Gretchen Norwood, F. Bailey Ramanathan, Ranjith VanOverbeke, Deborah |
author_facet | Depue, Sandra Molly Neilson, Morgan Marie Lusk, Jayson L. Mafi, Gretchen Norwood, F. Bailey Ramanathan, Ranjith VanOverbeke, Deborah |
author_sort | Depue, Sandra Molly |
collection | PubMed |
description | After receiving bad publicity in 2012 and being removed from many ground beef products, finely textured beef (referred to as ‘pink slime’ by some) is making a comeback. Some of its proponents argue that consumers prefer ground beef containing finely textured beef, but no objective scientific party has tested this claim—that is the purpose of the present study. Over 200 untrained subjects participated in a sensory analysis in which they tasted one ground beef sample with no finely textured beef, another with 15% finely textured beef (by weight), and another with more than 15%. Beef with 15% finely textured beef has an improved juiciness (p < 0.01) and tenderness (p < 0.01) quality. However, subjects rate the flavor-liking and overall likeability the same regardless of the finely textured beef content. Moreover, when the three beef types are consumed as part of a slider (small hamburger), subjects are indifferent to the level of finely textured beef. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5771606 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57716062018-01-23 Preference evaluation of ground beef by untrained subjects with three levels of finely textured beef Depue, Sandra Molly Neilson, Morgan Marie Lusk, Jayson L. Mafi, Gretchen Norwood, F. Bailey Ramanathan, Ranjith VanOverbeke, Deborah PLoS One Research Article After receiving bad publicity in 2012 and being removed from many ground beef products, finely textured beef (referred to as ‘pink slime’ by some) is making a comeback. Some of its proponents argue that consumers prefer ground beef containing finely textured beef, but no objective scientific party has tested this claim—that is the purpose of the present study. Over 200 untrained subjects participated in a sensory analysis in which they tasted one ground beef sample with no finely textured beef, another with 15% finely textured beef (by weight), and another with more than 15%. Beef with 15% finely textured beef has an improved juiciness (p < 0.01) and tenderness (p < 0.01) quality. However, subjects rate the flavor-liking and overall likeability the same regardless of the finely textured beef content. Moreover, when the three beef types are consumed as part of a slider (small hamburger), subjects are indifferent to the level of finely textured beef. Public Library of Science 2018-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5771606/ /pubmed/29342174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190680 Text en © 2018 Depue et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Depue, Sandra Molly Neilson, Morgan Marie Lusk, Jayson L. Mafi, Gretchen Norwood, F. Bailey Ramanathan, Ranjith VanOverbeke, Deborah Preference evaluation of ground beef by untrained subjects with three levels of finely textured beef |
title | Preference evaluation of ground beef by untrained subjects with three levels of finely textured beef |
title_full | Preference evaluation of ground beef by untrained subjects with three levels of finely textured beef |
title_fullStr | Preference evaluation of ground beef by untrained subjects with three levels of finely textured beef |
title_full_unstemmed | Preference evaluation of ground beef by untrained subjects with three levels of finely textured beef |
title_short | Preference evaluation of ground beef by untrained subjects with three levels of finely textured beef |
title_sort | preference evaluation of ground beef by untrained subjects with three levels of finely textured beef |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5771606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29342174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190680 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT depuesandramolly preferenceevaluationofgroundbeefbyuntrainedsubjectswiththreelevelsoffinelytexturedbeef AT neilsonmorganmarie preferenceevaluationofgroundbeefbyuntrainedsubjectswiththreelevelsoffinelytexturedbeef AT luskjaysonl preferenceevaluationofgroundbeefbyuntrainedsubjectswiththreelevelsoffinelytexturedbeef AT mafigretchen preferenceevaluationofgroundbeefbyuntrainedsubjectswiththreelevelsoffinelytexturedbeef AT norwoodfbailey preferenceevaluationofgroundbeefbyuntrainedsubjectswiththreelevelsoffinelytexturedbeef AT ramanathanranjith preferenceevaluationofgroundbeefbyuntrainedsubjectswiththreelevelsoffinelytexturedbeef AT vanoverbekedeborah preferenceevaluationofgroundbeefbyuntrainedsubjectswiththreelevelsoffinelytexturedbeef |