Cargando…
Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge
OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at evaluating the fixation of trabecular metal wedges in patients who underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty with large acetabular bone defects. METHODS: The radiographs of 19 patients (21 hips), who underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty using trabecular m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5771787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29367913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2017.11.008 |
_version_ | 1783293310838767616 |
---|---|
author | Fonseca Neto, Carlos Eduardo Benvindo Rosal da Lima, Marcos Murilo Santana Rabello, Bruno Tavares Sena, Leonardo da Silva Zacaron Júnior, Luiz Carlos Viana, Maurício Tarrago |
author_facet | Fonseca Neto, Carlos Eduardo Benvindo Rosal da Lima, Marcos Murilo Santana Rabello, Bruno Tavares Sena, Leonardo da Silva Zacaron Júnior, Luiz Carlos Viana, Maurício Tarrago |
author_sort | Fonseca Neto, Carlos Eduardo Benvindo Rosal da |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at evaluating the fixation of trabecular metal wedges in patients who underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty with large acetabular bone defects. METHODS: The radiographs of 19 patients (21 hips), who underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty using trabecular metal wedges from September 2010 to December 2014 were evaluated. This study included only cases of Paprosky 3A and 3B. Preoperative and postoperative images were analyzed. Non-fixation of the implant was defined by the presence of angular variation of the component higher 10 degrees or displacement greater than 6 mm. Patients with follow-up times of less than 24 months or who did not attend the last two appointments were excluded from the study. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 39.4 months (25–61). Fixation was achieved in all cases despite its complexity. There was only one case of dislocation that was treated with open reduction. One case developed infection, and was surgically approached on two occasions, with extensive debridement and intravenous antibiotics following protocol, with good evolution. CONCLUSION: The implanted trabecular metal wedges showed excellent results in the short- and medium-term and may represent another option in the reconstruction of large acetabular defects, sometimes replacing bone reconstruction that uses bone tissue banks or autologous graft. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5771787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57717872018-01-24 Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge Fonseca Neto, Carlos Eduardo Benvindo Rosal da Lima, Marcos Murilo Santana Rabello, Bruno Tavares Sena, Leonardo da Silva Zacaron Júnior, Luiz Carlos Viana, Maurício Tarrago Rev Bras Ortop Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at evaluating the fixation of trabecular metal wedges in patients who underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty with large acetabular bone defects. METHODS: The radiographs of 19 patients (21 hips), who underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty using trabecular metal wedges from September 2010 to December 2014 were evaluated. This study included only cases of Paprosky 3A and 3B. Preoperative and postoperative images were analyzed. Non-fixation of the implant was defined by the presence of angular variation of the component higher 10 degrees or displacement greater than 6 mm. Patients with follow-up times of less than 24 months or who did not attend the last two appointments were excluded from the study. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 39.4 months (25–61). Fixation was achieved in all cases despite its complexity. There was only one case of dislocation that was treated with open reduction. One case developed infection, and was surgically approached on two occasions, with extensive debridement and intravenous antibiotics following protocol, with good evolution. CONCLUSION: The implanted trabecular metal wedges showed excellent results in the short- and medium-term and may represent another option in the reconstruction of large acetabular defects, sometimes replacing bone reconstruction that uses bone tissue banks or autologous graft. Elsevier 2017-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5771787/ /pubmed/29367913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2017.11.008 Text en © 2017 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fonseca Neto, Carlos Eduardo Benvindo Rosal da Lima, Marcos Murilo Santana Rabello, Bruno Tavares Sena, Leonardo da Silva Zacaron Júnior, Luiz Carlos Viana, Maurício Tarrago Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge |
title | Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge |
title_full | Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge |
title_fullStr | Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge |
title_short | Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge |
title_sort | radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with paprosky 3a and 3b submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5771787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29367913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2017.11.008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fonsecanetocarloseduardobenvindorosalda radiographicevaluationof19patientswithpaprosky3aand3bsubmittedtoacetabularreviewwithtrabecularmetalwedge AT limamarcosmurilosantana radiographicevaluationof19patientswithpaprosky3aand3bsubmittedtoacetabularreviewwithtrabecularmetalwedge AT rabellobrunotavares radiographicevaluationof19patientswithpaprosky3aand3bsubmittedtoacetabularreviewwithtrabecularmetalwedge AT senaleonardodasilva radiographicevaluationof19patientswithpaprosky3aand3bsubmittedtoacetabularreviewwithtrabecularmetalwedge AT zacaronjuniorluizcarlos radiographicevaluationof19patientswithpaprosky3aand3bsubmittedtoacetabularreviewwithtrabecularmetalwedge AT vianamauriciotarrago radiographicevaluationof19patientswithpaprosky3aand3bsubmittedtoacetabularreviewwithtrabecularmetalwedge |