Cargando…

Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge

OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at evaluating the fixation of trabecular metal wedges in patients who underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty with large acetabular bone defects. METHODS: The radiographs of 19 patients (21 hips), who underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty using trabecular m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fonseca Neto, Carlos Eduardo Benvindo Rosal da, Lima, Marcos Murilo Santana, Rabello, Bruno Tavares, Sena, Leonardo da Silva, Zacaron Júnior, Luiz Carlos, Viana, Maurício Tarrago
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5771787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29367913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2017.11.008
_version_ 1783293310838767616
author Fonseca Neto, Carlos Eduardo Benvindo Rosal da
Lima, Marcos Murilo Santana
Rabello, Bruno Tavares
Sena, Leonardo da Silva
Zacaron Júnior, Luiz Carlos
Viana, Maurício Tarrago
author_facet Fonseca Neto, Carlos Eduardo Benvindo Rosal da
Lima, Marcos Murilo Santana
Rabello, Bruno Tavares
Sena, Leonardo da Silva
Zacaron Júnior, Luiz Carlos
Viana, Maurício Tarrago
author_sort Fonseca Neto, Carlos Eduardo Benvindo Rosal da
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at evaluating the fixation of trabecular metal wedges in patients who underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty with large acetabular bone defects. METHODS: The radiographs of 19 patients (21 hips), who underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty using trabecular metal wedges from September 2010 to December 2014 were evaluated. This study included only cases of Paprosky 3A and 3B. Preoperative and postoperative images were analyzed. Non-fixation of the implant was defined by the presence of angular variation of the component higher 10 degrees or displacement greater than 6 mm. Patients with follow-up times of less than 24 months or who did not attend the last two appointments were excluded from the study. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 39.4 months (25–61). Fixation was achieved in all cases despite its complexity. There was only one case of dislocation that was treated with open reduction. One case developed infection, and was surgically approached on two occasions, with extensive debridement and intravenous antibiotics following protocol, with good evolution. CONCLUSION: The implanted trabecular metal wedges showed excellent results in the short- and medium-term and may represent another option in the reconstruction of large acetabular defects, sometimes replacing bone reconstruction that uses bone tissue banks or autologous graft.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5771787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57717872018-01-24 Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge Fonseca Neto, Carlos Eduardo Benvindo Rosal da Lima, Marcos Murilo Santana Rabello, Bruno Tavares Sena, Leonardo da Silva Zacaron Júnior, Luiz Carlos Viana, Maurício Tarrago Rev Bras Ortop Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at evaluating the fixation of trabecular metal wedges in patients who underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty with large acetabular bone defects. METHODS: The radiographs of 19 patients (21 hips), who underwent revision of total hip arthroplasty using trabecular metal wedges from September 2010 to December 2014 were evaluated. This study included only cases of Paprosky 3A and 3B. Preoperative and postoperative images were analyzed. Non-fixation of the implant was defined by the presence of angular variation of the component higher 10 degrees or displacement greater than 6 mm. Patients with follow-up times of less than 24 months or who did not attend the last two appointments were excluded from the study. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 39.4 months (25–61). Fixation was achieved in all cases despite its complexity. There was only one case of dislocation that was treated with open reduction. One case developed infection, and was surgically approached on two occasions, with extensive debridement and intravenous antibiotics following protocol, with good evolution. CONCLUSION: The implanted trabecular metal wedges showed excellent results in the short- and medium-term and may represent another option in the reconstruction of large acetabular defects, sometimes replacing bone reconstruction that uses bone tissue banks or autologous graft. Elsevier 2017-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5771787/ /pubmed/29367913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2017.11.008 Text en © 2017 Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Fonseca Neto, Carlos Eduardo Benvindo Rosal da
Lima, Marcos Murilo Santana
Rabello, Bruno Tavares
Sena, Leonardo da Silva
Zacaron Júnior, Luiz Carlos
Viana, Maurício Tarrago
Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge
title Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge
title_full Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge
title_fullStr Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge
title_full_unstemmed Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge
title_short Radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with Paprosky 3A and 3B submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge
title_sort radiographic evaluation of 19 patients with paprosky 3a and 3b submitted to acetabular review with trabecular metal wedge
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5771787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29367913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2017.11.008
work_keys_str_mv AT fonsecanetocarloseduardobenvindorosalda radiographicevaluationof19patientswithpaprosky3aand3bsubmittedtoacetabularreviewwithtrabecularmetalwedge
AT limamarcosmurilosantana radiographicevaluationof19patientswithpaprosky3aand3bsubmittedtoacetabularreviewwithtrabecularmetalwedge
AT rabellobrunotavares radiographicevaluationof19patientswithpaprosky3aand3bsubmittedtoacetabularreviewwithtrabecularmetalwedge
AT senaleonardodasilva radiographicevaluationof19patientswithpaprosky3aand3bsubmittedtoacetabularreviewwithtrabecularmetalwedge
AT zacaronjuniorluizcarlos radiographicevaluationof19patientswithpaprosky3aand3bsubmittedtoacetabularreviewwithtrabecularmetalwedge
AT vianamauriciotarrago radiographicevaluationof19patientswithpaprosky3aand3bsubmittedtoacetabularreviewwithtrabecularmetalwedge