Cargando…

Abnormal beta power is a hallmark of explicit movement control in functional movement disorders

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether sensorimotor beta-frequency oscillatory power is raised during motor preparation in patients with functional movement disorders (FMD) and could therefore be a marker of abnormal “body-focused” attention. METHODS: We analyzed motor performance and beta-frequency cortic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teodoro, Tiago, Meppelink, Anne Marthe, Little, Simon, Grant, Robert, Nielsen, Glenn, Macerollo, Antonella, Pareés, Isabel, Edwards, Mark J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5772156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29273688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004830
_version_ 1783293362209554432
author Teodoro, Tiago
Meppelink, Anne Marthe
Little, Simon
Grant, Robert
Nielsen, Glenn
Macerollo, Antonella
Pareés, Isabel
Edwards, Mark J.
author_facet Teodoro, Tiago
Meppelink, Anne Marthe
Little, Simon
Grant, Robert
Nielsen, Glenn
Macerollo, Antonella
Pareés, Isabel
Edwards, Mark J.
author_sort Teodoro, Tiago
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine whether sensorimotor beta-frequency oscillatory power is raised during motor preparation in patients with functional movement disorders (FMD) and could therefore be a marker of abnormal “body-focused” attention. METHODS: We analyzed motor performance and beta-frequency cortical oscillations during a precued choice reaction time (RT) task with varying cue validity (50% or 95% congruence between preparation and go cues). We compared 21 patients with FMD with 13 healthy controls (HCs). RESULTS: In HCs, highly predictive cues were associated with faster RT and beta desynchronization in the contralateral hemisphere (contralateral slope −0.045 [95% confidence interval (CI) −0.057 to −0.033] vs ipsilateral −0.033 [95% CI −0.046 to −0.021], p < 0.001) and with a tendency for reaching lower contralateral end-of-preparation beta power (contralateral −0.482 [95% CI −0.827 to −0.137] vs ipsilateral −0.328 [95% CI −0.673 to 0.016], p = 0.069). In contrast, patients with FMD had no improvement in RTs with highly predictive cues and showed an impairment of beta desynchronization and lateralization before movement. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent beta synchronization during motor preparation could reflect abnormal explicit control of movement in FMD. Excessive attention to movement itself rather than the goal might maintain beta synchronization and impair performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5772156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57721562018-01-22 Abnormal beta power is a hallmark of explicit movement control in functional movement disorders Teodoro, Tiago Meppelink, Anne Marthe Little, Simon Grant, Robert Nielsen, Glenn Macerollo, Antonella Pareés, Isabel Edwards, Mark J. Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: To determine whether sensorimotor beta-frequency oscillatory power is raised during motor preparation in patients with functional movement disorders (FMD) and could therefore be a marker of abnormal “body-focused” attention. METHODS: We analyzed motor performance and beta-frequency cortical oscillations during a precued choice reaction time (RT) task with varying cue validity (50% or 95% congruence between preparation and go cues). We compared 21 patients with FMD with 13 healthy controls (HCs). RESULTS: In HCs, highly predictive cues were associated with faster RT and beta desynchronization in the contralateral hemisphere (contralateral slope −0.045 [95% confidence interval (CI) −0.057 to −0.033] vs ipsilateral −0.033 [95% CI −0.046 to −0.021], p < 0.001) and with a tendency for reaching lower contralateral end-of-preparation beta power (contralateral −0.482 [95% CI −0.827 to −0.137] vs ipsilateral −0.328 [95% CI −0.673 to 0.016], p = 0.069). In contrast, patients with FMD had no improvement in RTs with highly predictive cues and showed an impairment of beta desynchronization and lateralization before movement. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent beta synchronization during motor preparation could reflect abnormal explicit control of movement in FMD. Excessive attention to movement itself rather than the goal might maintain beta synchronization and impair performance. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5772156/ /pubmed/29273688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004830 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Teodoro, Tiago
Meppelink, Anne Marthe
Little, Simon
Grant, Robert
Nielsen, Glenn
Macerollo, Antonella
Pareés, Isabel
Edwards, Mark J.
Abnormal beta power is a hallmark of explicit movement control in functional movement disorders
title Abnormal beta power is a hallmark of explicit movement control in functional movement disorders
title_full Abnormal beta power is a hallmark of explicit movement control in functional movement disorders
title_fullStr Abnormal beta power is a hallmark of explicit movement control in functional movement disorders
title_full_unstemmed Abnormal beta power is a hallmark of explicit movement control in functional movement disorders
title_short Abnormal beta power is a hallmark of explicit movement control in functional movement disorders
title_sort abnormal beta power is a hallmark of explicit movement control in functional movement disorders
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5772156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29273688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004830
work_keys_str_mv AT teodorotiago abnormalbetapowerisahallmarkofexplicitmovementcontrolinfunctionalmovementdisorders
AT meppelinkannemarthe abnormalbetapowerisahallmarkofexplicitmovementcontrolinfunctionalmovementdisorders
AT littlesimon abnormalbetapowerisahallmarkofexplicitmovementcontrolinfunctionalmovementdisorders
AT grantrobert abnormalbetapowerisahallmarkofexplicitmovementcontrolinfunctionalmovementdisorders
AT nielsenglenn abnormalbetapowerisahallmarkofexplicitmovementcontrolinfunctionalmovementdisorders
AT macerolloantonella abnormalbetapowerisahallmarkofexplicitmovementcontrolinfunctionalmovementdisorders
AT pareesisabel abnormalbetapowerisahallmarkofexplicitmovementcontrolinfunctionalmovementdisorders
AT edwardsmarkj abnormalbetapowerisahallmarkofexplicitmovementcontrolinfunctionalmovementdisorders