Cargando…

Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of Brazil

OBJECTIVE: To analyze if the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in the delivery care in the South region of Brazil. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analysis of the longitudinal study Nascer no Brasil. We analyzed data from 2,070 women from the South region of Brazil who went...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monguilhott, Juliana Jacques da Costa, Brüggemann, Odaléa Maria, Freitas, Paulo Fontoura, d'Orsi, Eleonora
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5772405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29364356
http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052006258
_version_ 1783293407280496640
author Monguilhott, Juliana Jacques da Costa
Brüggemann, Odaléa Maria
Freitas, Paulo Fontoura
d'Orsi, Eleonora
author_facet Monguilhott, Juliana Jacques da Costa
Brüggemann, Odaléa Maria
Freitas, Paulo Fontoura
d'Orsi, Eleonora
author_sort Monguilhott, Juliana Jacques da Costa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze if the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in the delivery care in the South region of Brazil. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analysis of the longitudinal study Nascer no Brasil. We analyzed data from 2,070 women from the South region of Brazil who went into labor. The data were collected between February and August 2011, by interviews and medical records. We performed a bivariate and multivariate analysis, calculating the crude and adjusted prevalence ratios using Poisson regression with robust variance estimation. The level of significance adopted was 5%. RESULTS: Most women had a companion during labor (51.7%), but few remained during delivery (39.4%) or cesarean section (34.8%). Less than half of the women had access to several recommended practices, while non-recommended practices continue to be performed. In the model adjusted for age, education level, source of payment for the delivery, parity, and score of the Brazilian Association of Market Research Institutes, the presence of a companion was statistically associated with a greater supply of liquids and food (aPR = 1.34), dietary prescription (aPR = 1.34), use of non-pharmacological methods for pain relief (aPR = 1.37), amniotomy (aPR = 1.10), epidural or spinal analgesia (aPR = 1.84), adoption of non-lithotomy position in the delivery (aPR = 1.77), stay in the same room during labor, delivery, and postpartum (aPR = 1.62), skin-to-skin contact in the delivery (aPR = 1.81) and cesarean section (PR = 2.43), as well as reduced use of the Kristeller maneuver (aPR = 0.67), trichotomy (aPR = 0.59), and enema (aPR = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: In the South region of Brazil, most women do not have access to the best practices in addition to undergoing several unnecessary interventions. The presence of a companion is associated with several beneficial practices and the reduction in some interventions, although other interventions are not impacted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5772405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57724052018-01-22 Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of Brazil Monguilhott, Juliana Jacques da Costa Brüggemann, Odaléa Maria Freitas, Paulo Fontoura d'Orsi, Eleonora Rev Saude Publica Original Article OBJECTIVE: To analyze if the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in the delivery care in the South region of Brazil. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analysis of the longitudinal study Nascer no Brasil. We analyzed data from 2,070 women from the South region of Brazil who went into labor. The data were collected between February and August 2011, by interviews and medical records. We performed a bivariate and multivariate analysis, calculating the crude and adjusted prevalence ratios using Poisson regression with robust variance estimation. The level of significance adopted was 5%. RESULTS: Most women had a companion during labor (51.7%), but few remained during delivery (39.4%) or cesarean section (34.8%). Less than half of the women had access to several recommended practices, while non-recommended practices continue to be performed. In the model adjusted for age, education level, source of payment for the delivery, parity, and score of the Brazilian Association of Market Research Institutes, the presence of a companion was statistically associated with a greater supply of liquids and food (aPR = 1.34), dietary prescription (aPR = 1.34), use of non-pharmacological methods for pain relief (aPR = 1.37), amniotomy (aPR = 1.10), epidural or spinal analgesia (aPR = 1.84), adoption of non-lithotomy position in the delivery (aPR = 1.77), stay in the same room during labor, delivery, and postpartum (aPR = 1.62), skin-to-skin contact in the delivery (aPR = 1.81) and cesarean section (PR = 2.43), as well as reduced use of the Kristeller maneuver (aPR = 0.67), trichotomy (aPR = 0.59), and enema (aPR = 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: In the South region of Brazil, most women do not have access to the best practices in addition to undergoing several unnecessary interventions. The presence of a companion is associated with several beneficial practices and the reduction in some interventions, although other interventions are not impacted. Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo 2018-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5772405/ /pubmed/29364356 http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052006258 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Monguilhott, Juliana Jacques da Costa
Brüggemann, Odaléa Maria
Freitas, Paulo Fontoura
d'Orsi, Eleonora
Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of Brazil
title Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of Brazil
title_full Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of Brazil
title_fullStr Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of Brazil
title_short Nascer no Brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the South region of Brazil
title_sort nascer no brasil: the presence of a companion favors the use of best practices in delivery care in the south region of brazil
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5772405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29364356
http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052006258
work_keys_str_mv AT monguilhottjulianajacquesdacosta nascernobrasilthepresenceofacompanionfavorstheuseofbestpracticesindeliverycareinthesouthregionofbrazil
AT bruggemannodaleamaria nascernobrasilthepresenceofacompanionfavorstheuseofbestpracticesindeliverycareinthesouthregionofbrazil
AT freitaspaulofontoura nascernobrasilthepresenceofacompanionfavorstheuseofbestpracticesindeliverycareinthesouthregionofbrazil
AT dorsieleonora nascernobrasilthepresenceofacompanionfavorstheuseofbestpracticesindeliverycareinthesouthregionofbrazil