Cargando…
Comparison of modified wet suction technique and dry suction technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Several suction techniques have been developed recently to enhance tissue acquisition when sampling solid lesions using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). The aim of this study is to determine whether a new modified wet suction technique (MWST) compared with t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5773018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29343303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2380-y |
_version_ | 1783293491768459264 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Yun Chen, Qian Wang, Jinlin Wu, Xiaoli Duan, Yaqi Yin, Ping Guo, Qiaozhen Hou, Wei Cheng, Bin |
author_facet | Wang, Yun Chen, Qian Wang, Jinlin Wu, Xiaoli Duan, Yaqi Yin, Ping Guo, Qiaozhen Hou, Wei Cheng, Bin |
author_sort | Wang, Yun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several suction techniques have been developed recently to enhance tissue acquisition when sampling solid lesions using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). The aim of this study is to determine whether a new modified wet suction technique (MWST) compared with the conventional dry suction technique (DRST) shall present better outcomes with respect to diagnostic yield and specimen quality of solid lesions in the intra-abdomen and mediastinum. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single-blind, randomized, controlled, superiority trial conducted at four large tertiary care centers in China. Two hundred and ninety-six patients with solid lesions referred for EUS-FNA will be randomly assigned to group A, using DRST for the first pass, or group B, using MWST for the first pass in a ratio of 1:1. Following a 2 × 2 cross-over design, the pass sequence for group A is DRST, MWST, DRST, MWST. For group B, the pass sequence is MWST, DRST, MWST, DRST. All procedures will be performed by experienced echoendoscopists, and the patients and assessors (cytologists and pathologists) will be blinded during the entire study. The primary outcome measure is the diagnosis yield. Secondary outcome measures are specimen quality, including assessment of quantity of cell, tissue integrity, and blood contamination. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale randomized controlled trial to compare MWST with DRST when sampling solid lesions in the intra-abdomen and mediastinum. The results may contribute to future multicenter clinical trials in standardizing suction techniques during EUS-FNA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov, NCT02789371. Retrospectively registered on 6 June 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2380-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5773018 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57730182018-01-26 Comparison of modified wet suction technique and dry suction technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Wang, Yun Chen, Qian Wang, Jinlin Wu, Xiaoli Duan, Yaqi Yin, Ping Guo, Qiaozhen Hou, Wei Cheng, Bin Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Several suction techniques have been developed recently to enhance tissue acquisition when sampling solid lesions using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). The aim of this study is to determine whether a new modified wet suction technique (MWST) compared with the conventional dry suction technique (DRST) shall present better outcomes with respect to diagnostic yield and specimen quality of solid lesions in the intra-abdomen and mediastinum. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single-blind, randomized, controlled, superiority trial conducted at four large tertiary care centers in China. Two hundred and ninety-six patients with solid lesions referred for EUS-FNA will be randomly assigned to group A, using DRST for the first pass, or group B, using MWST for the first pass in a ratio of 1:1. Following a 2 × 2 cross-over design, the pass sequence for group A is DRST, MWST, DRST, MWST. For group B, the pass sequence is MWST, DRST, MWST, DRST. All procedures will be performed by experienced echoendoscopists, and the patients and assessors (cytologists and pathologists) will be blinded during the entire study. The primary outcome measure is the diagnosis yield. Secondary outcome measures are specimen quality, including assessment of quantity of cell, tissue integrity, and blood contamination. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale randomized controlled trial to compare MWST with DRST when sampling solid lesions in the intra-abdomen and mediastinum. The results may contribute to future multicenter clinical trials in standardizing suction techniques during EUS-FNA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov, NCT02789371. Retrospectively registered on 6 June 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2380-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5773018/ /pubmed/29343303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2380-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Wang, Yun Chen, Qian Wang, Jinlin Wu, Xiaoli Duan, Yaqi Yin, Ping Guo, Qiaozhen Hou, Wei Cheng, Bin Comparison of modified wet suction technique and dry suction technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparison of modified wet suction technique and dry suction technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison of modified wet suction technique and dry suction technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of modified wet suction technique and dry suction technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of modified wet suction technique and dry suction technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison of modified wet suction technique and dry suction technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of modified wet suction technique and dry suction technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (eus-fna) for solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5773018/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29343303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2380-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangyun comparisonofmodifiedwetsuctiontechniqueanddrysuctiontechniqueinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationeusfnaforsolidlesionsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenqian comparisonofmodifiedwetsuctiontechniqueanddrysuctiontechniqueinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationeusfnaforsolidlesionsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wangjinlin comparisonofmodifiedwetsuctiontechniqueanddrysuctiontechniqueinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationeusfnaforsolidlesionsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wuxiaoli comparisonofmodifiedwetsuctiontechniqueanddrysuctiontechniqueinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationeusfnaforsolidlesionsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT duanyaqi comparisonofmodifiedwetsuctiontechniqueanddrysuctiontechniqueinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationeusfnaforsolidlesionsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yinping comparisonofmodifiedwetsuctiontechniqueanddrysuctiontechniqueinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationeusfnaforsolidlesionsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT guoqiaozhen comparisonofmodifiedwetsuctiontechniqueanddrysuctiontechniqueinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationeusfnaforsolidlesionsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT houwei comparisonofmodifiedwetsuctiontechniqueanddrysuctiontechniqueinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationeusfnaforsolidlesionsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chengbin comparisonofmodifiedwetsuctiontechniqueanddrysuctiontechniqueinendoscopicultrasoundguidedfineneedleaspirationeusfnaforsolidlesionsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |