Cargando…

The Impact of Neurophysiological Intraoperative Monitoring during Spinal Cord and Spine Surgery: A Critical Analysis of 121 Cases

Neuromonitoring has been utilized during spinal surgery to assess the function of the spinal cord in an effort to prevent intraoperative injury. Although its use is widespread, no clear benefit has been demonstrated. Our goal in this study was to interrogate the value of intraoperative neuromonitori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ibrahim, Tarik, Mrowczynski, Oliver, Zalatimo, Omar, Chinchilli, Vernon, Sheehan, Jonas, Harbaugh, Robert, Rizk, Elias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5773282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375947
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1861
_version_ 1783293538835890176
author Ibrahim, Tarik
Mrowczynski, Oliver
Zalatimo, Omar
Chinchilli, Vernon
Sheehan, Jonas
Harbaugh, Robert
Rizk, Elias
author_facet Ibrahim, Tarik
Mrowczynski, Oliver
Zalatimo, Omar
Chinchilli, Vernon
Sheehan, Jonas
Harbaugh, Robert
Rizk, Elias
author_sort Ibrahim, Tarik
collection PubMed
description Neuromonitoring has been utilized during spinal surgery to assess the function of the spinal cord in an effort to prevent intraoperative injury. Although its use is widespread, no clear benefit has been demonstrated. Our goal in this study was to interrogate the value of intraoperative neuromonitoring in decreasing the severity and rate of neurological injury during and after spinal surgery. Here we describe our experience of 121 patients who underwent spinal cord procedures with the combination of intraoperative neuromonitoring, to determine its ability to detect neurological changes and the specificity and sensitivity in this setting. The data for the 121 patients who underwent neurophysiological monitoring during various spinal procedures was collected retrospectively. The patients were classified into one of four groups according to the findings of intraoperative monitoring and the clinical outcomes on postoperative neurological exam. Intraoperative monitoring was evaluated for its specificity, sensitivity, and predictive value. In our cohort of 121 patients, the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring had a low sensitivity, which may produce an excessive number of false negatives. Based on these findings, neuromonitoring seems to have a poor positive predictive value and is thus an inappropriate test to prevent harm to patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5773282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57732822018-01-28 The Impact of Neurophysiological Intraoperative Monitoring during Spinal Cord and Spine Surgery: A Critical Analysis of 121 Cases Ibrahim, Tarik Mrowczynski, Oliver Zalatimo, Omar Chinchilli, Vernon Sheehan, Jonas Harbaugh, Robert Rizk, Elias Cureus Neurosurgery Neuromonitoring has been utilized during spinal surgery to assess the function of the spinal cord in an effort to prevent intraoperative injury. Although its use is widespread, no clear benefit has been demonstrated. Our goal in this study was to interrogate the value of intraoperative neuromonitoring in decreasing the severity and rate of neurological injury during and after spinal surgery. Here we describe our experience of 121 patients who underwent spinal cord procedures with the combination of intraoperative neuromonitoring, to determine its ability to detect neurological changes and the specificity and sensitivity in this setting. The data for the 121 patients who underwent neurophysiological monitoring during various spinal procedures was collected retrospectively. The patients were classified into one of four groups according to the findings of intraoperative monitoring and the clinical outcomes on postoperative neurological exam. Intraoperative monitoring was evaluated for its specificity, sensitivity, and predictive value. In our cohort of 121 patients, the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring had a low sensitivity, which may produce an excessive number of false negatives. Based on these findings, neuromonitoring seems to have a poor positive predictive value and is thus an inappropriate test to prevent harm to patients. Cureus 2017-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5773282/ /pubmed/29375947 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1861 Text en Copyright © 2017, Ibrahim et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neurosurgery
Ibrahim, Tarik
Mrowczynski, Oliver
Zalatimo, Omar
Chinchilli, Vernon
Sheehan, Jonas
Harbaugh, Robert
Rizk, Elias
The Impact of Neurophysiological Intraoperative Monitoring during Spinal Cord and Spine Surgery: A Critical Analysis of 121 Cases
title The Impact of Neurophysiological Intraoperative Monitoring during Spinal Cord and Spine Surgery: A Critical Analysis of 121 Cases
title_full The Impact of Neurophysiological Intraoperative Monitoring during Spinal Cord and Spine Surgery: A Critical Analysis of 121 Cases
title_fullStr The Impact of Neurophysiological Intraoperative Monitoring during Spinal Cord and Spine Surgery: A Critical Analysis of 121 Cases
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Neurophysiological Intraoperative Monitoring during Spinal Cord and Spine Surgery: A Critical Analysis of 121 Cases
title_short The Impact of Neurophysiological Intraoperative Monitoring during Spinal Cord and Spine Surgery: A Critical Analysis of 121 Cases
title_sort impact of neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring during spinal cord and spine surgery: a critical analysis of 121 cases
topic Neurosurgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5773282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375947
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1861
work_keys_str_mv AT ibrahimtarik theimpactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases
AT mrowczynskioliver theimpactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases
AT zalatimoomar theimpactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases
AT chinchillivernon theimpactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases
AT sheehanjonas theimpactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases
AT harbaughrobert theimpactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases
AT rizkelias theimpactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases
AT ibrahimtarik impactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases
AT mrowczynskioliver impactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases
AT zalatimoomar impactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases
AT chinchillivernon impactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases
AT sheehanjonas impactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases
AT harbaughrobert impactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases
AT rizkelias impactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases