Cargando…
The Impact of Neurophysiological Intraoperative Monitoring during Spinal Cord and Spine Surgery: A Critical Analysis of 121 Cases
Neuromonitoring has been utilized during spinal surgery to assess the function of the spinal cord in an effort to prevent intraoperative injury. Although its use is widespread, no clear benefit has been demonstrated. Our goal in this study was to interrogate the value of intraoperative neuromonitori...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5773282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375947 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1861 |
_version_ | 1783293538835890176 |
---|---|
author | Ibrahim, Tarik Mrowczynski, Oliver Zalatimo, Omar Chinchilli, Vernon Sheehan, Jonas Harbaugh, Robert Rizk, Elias |
author_facet | Ibrahim, Tarik Mrowczynski, Oliver Zalatimo, Omar Chinchilli, Vernon Sheehan, Jonas Harbaugh, Robert Rizk, Elias |
author_sort | Ibrahim, Tarik |
collection | PubMed |
description | Neuromonitoring has been utilized during spinal surgery to assess the function of the spinal cord in an effort to prevent intraoperative injury. Although its use is widespread, no clear benefit has been demonstrated. Our goal in this study was to interrogate the value of intraoperative neuromonitoring in decreasing the severity and rate of neurological injury during and after spinal surgery. Here we describe our experience of 121 patients who underwent spinal cord procedures with the combination of intraoperative neuromonitoring, to determine its ability to detect neurological changes and the specificity and sensitivity in this setting. The data for the 121 patients who underwent neurophysiological monitoring during various spinal procedures was collected retrospectively. The patients were classified into one of four groups according to the findings of intraoperative monitoring and the clinical outcomes on postoperative neurological exam. Intraoperative monitoring was evaluated for its specificity, sensitivity, and predictive value. In our cohort of 121 patients, the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring had a low sensitivity, which may produce an excessive number of false negatives. Based on these findings, neuromonitoring seems to have a poor positive predictive value and is thus an inappropriate test to prevent harm to patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5773282 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57732822018-01-28 The Impact of Neurophysiological Intraoperative Monitoring during Spinal Cord and Spine Surgery: A Critical Analysis of 121 Cases Ibrahim, Tarik Mrowczynski, Oliver Zalatimo, Omar Chinchilli, Vernon Sheehan, Jonas Harbaugh, Robert Rizk, Elias Cureus Neurosurgery Neuromonitoring has been utilized during spinal surgery to assess the function of the spinal cord in an effort to prevent intraoperative injury. Although its use is widespread, no clear benefit has been demonstrated. Our goal in this study was to interrogate the value of intraoperative neuromonitoring in decreasing the severity and rate of neurological injury during and after spinal surgery. Here we describe our experience of 121 patients who underwent spinal cord procedures with the combination of intraoperative neuromonitoring, to determine its ability to detect neurological changes and the specificity and sensitivity in this setting. The data for the 121 patients who underwent neurophysiological monitoring during various spinal procedures was collected retrospectively. The patients were classified into one of four groups according to the findings of intraoperative monitoring and the clinical outcomes on postoperative neurological exam. Intraoperative monitoring was evaluated for its specificity, sensitivity, and predictive value. In our cohort of 121 patients, the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring had a low sensitivity, which may produce an excessive number of false negatives. Based on these findings, neuromonitoring seems to have a poor positive predictive value and is thus an inappropriate test to prevent harm to patients. Cureus 2017-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5773282/ /pubmed/29375947 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1861 Text en Copyright © 2017, Ibrahim et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neurosurgery Ibrahim, Tarik Mrowczynski, Oliver Zalatimo, Omar Chinchilli, Vernon Sheehan, Jonas Harbaugh, Robert Rizk, Elias The Impact of Neurophysiological Intraoperative Monitoring during Spinal Cord and Spine Surgery: A Critical Analysis of 121 Cases |
title | The Impact of Neurophysiological Intraoperative Monitoring during Spinal Cord and Spine Surgery: A Critical Analysis of 121 Cases |
title_full | The Impact of Neurophysiological Intraoperative Monitoring during Spinal Cord and Spine Surgery: A Critical Analysis of 121 Cases |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Neurophysiological Intraoperative Monitoring during Spinal Cord and Spine Surgery: A Critical Analysis of 121 Cases |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Neurophysiological Intraoperative Monitoring during Spinal Cord and Spine Surgery: A Critical Analysis of 121 Cases |
title_short | The Impact of Neurophysiological Intraoperative Monitoring during Spinal Cord and Spine Surgery: A Critical Analysis of 121 Cases |
title_sort | impact of neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring during spinal cord and spine surgery: a critical analysis of 121 cases |
topic | Neurosurgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5773282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375947 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1861 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ibrahimtarik theimpactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases AT mrowczynskioliver theimpactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases AT zalatimoomar theimpactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases AT chinchillivernon theimpactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases AT sheehanjonas theimpactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases AT harbaughrobert theimpactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases AT rizkelias theimpactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases AT ibrahimtarik impactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases AT mrowczynskioliver impactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases AT zalatimoomar impactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases AT chinchillivernon impactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases AT sheehanjonas impactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases AT harbaughrobert impactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases AT rizkelias impactofneurophysiologicalintraoperativemonitoringduringspinalcordandspinesurgeryacriticalanalysisof121cases |