Cargando…
The baubellum is more developmentally and evolutionarily labile than the baculum
Understanding the evolutionary forces that influence sexual dimorphism is a fundamental goal in biology. Here, we focus on one particularly extreme example of sexual dimorphism. Many mammal species possess a bone in their penis called a baculum. The female equivalent of this bone is called the baube...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5773289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3634 |
_version_ | 1783293539632807936 |
---|---|
author | Lough‐Stevens, Michael Schultz, Nicholas G. Dean, Matthew D. |
author_facet | Lough‐Stevens, Michael Schultz, Nicholas G. Dean, Matthew D. |
author_sort | Lough‐Stevens, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Understanding the evolutionary forces that influence sexual dimorphism is a fundamental goal in biology. Here, we focus on one particularly extreme example of sexual dimorphism. Many mammal species possess a bone in their penis called a baculum. The female equivalent of this bone is called the baubellum and occurs in the clitoris, which is developmentally homologous to the male penis. To understand the potential linkage between these two structures, we scored baculum/baubellum presence/absence across 163 species and analyzed their distribution in a phylogenetic framework. The majority of species (N = 134) shared the same state in males and females (both baculum and baubellum present or absent). However, the baubellum has experienced significantly more transitions, and more recent transitions, so that the remaining 29 species have a baculum but not a well‐developed baubellum. Even in species where both bones are present, the baubellum shows more ontogenetic variability and harbors more morphological variation than the baculum. Our study demonstrates that the baculum and baubellum are generally correlated across mammals, but that the baubellum is more evolutionarily and developmentally labile than the baculum. The accumulation of more evolutionary transitions, especially losses in the baubellum, as well as noisier developmental patterns, suggests that the baubellum may be nonfunctional, and lost over time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5773289 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57732892018-01-26 The baubellum is more developmentally and evolutionarily labile than the baculum Lough‐Stevens, Michael Schultz, Nicholas G. Dean, Matthew D. Ecol Evol Original Research Understanding the evolutionary forces that influence sexual dimorphism is a fundamental goal in biology. Here, we focus on one particularly extreme example of sexual dimorphism. Many mammal species possess a bone in their penis called a baculum. The female equivalent of this bone is called the baubellum and occurs in the clitoris, which is developmentally homologous to the male penis. To understand the potential linkage between these two structures, we scored baculum/baubellum presence/absence across 163 species and analyzed their distribution in a phylogenetic framework. The majority of species (N = 134) shared the same state in males and females (both baculum and baubellum present or absent). However, the baubellum has experienced significantly more transitions, and more recent transitions, so that the remaining 29 species have a baculum but not a well‐developed baubellum. Even in species where both bones are present, the baubellum shows more ontogenetic variability and harbors more morphological variation than the baculum. Our study demonstrates that the baculum and baubellum are generally correlated across mammals, but that the baubellum is more evolutionarily and developmentally labile than the baculum. The accumulation of more evolutionary transitions, especially losses in the baubellum, as well as noisier developmental patterns, suggests that the baubellum may be nonfunctional, and lost over time. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5773289/ /pubmed/29375780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3634 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lough‐Stevens, Michael Schultz, Nicholas G. Dean, Matthew D. The baubellum is more developmentally and evolutionarily labile than the baculum |
title | The baubellum is more developmentally and evolutionarily labile than the baculum |
title_full | The baubellum is more developmentally and evolutionarily labile than the baculum |
title_fullStr | The baubellum is more developmentally and evolutionarily labile than the baculum |
title_full_unstemmed | The baubellum is more developmentally and evolutionarily labile than the baculum |
title_short | The baubellum is more developmentally and evolutionarily labile than the baculum |
title_sort | baubellum is more developmentally and evolutionarily labile than the baculum |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5773289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3634 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loughstevensmichael thebaubellumismoredevelopmentallyandevolutionarilylabilethanthebaculum AT schultznicholasg thebaubellumismoredevelopmentallyandevolutionarilylabilethanthebaculum AT deanmatthewd thebaubellumismoredevelopmentallyandevolutionarilylabilethanthebaculum AT loughstevensmichael baubellumismoredevelopmentallyandevolutionarilylabilethanthebaculum AT schultznicholasg baubellumismoredevelopmentallyandevolutionarilylabilethanthebaculum AT deanmatthewd baubellumismoredevelopmentallyandevolutionarilylabilethanthebaculum |