Cargando…

Indirect risk effects reduce feeding efficiency of ducks during spring

Indirect risk effects of predators on prey behavior can have more of an impact on prey populations than direct consumptive effects. Predation risk can elicit more vigilance behavior in prey, reducing the amount of time available for other activities, such as foraging, which could potentially reduce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Behney, Adam C., O'Shaughnessy, Ryan, Eichholz, Michael W., Stafford, Joshua D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5773304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3714
_version_ 1783293543383564288
author Behney, Adam C.
O'Shaughnessy, Ryan
Eichholz, Michael W.
Stafford, Joshua D.
author_facet Behney, Adam C.
O'Shaughnessy, Ryan
Eichholz, Michael W.
Stafford, Joshua D.
author_sort Behney, Adam C.
collection PubMed
description Indirect risk effects of predators on prey behavior can have more of an impact on prey populations than direct consumptive effects. Predation risk can elicit more vigilance behavior in prey, reducing the amount of time available for other activities, such as foraging, which could potentially reduce foraging efficiency. Understanding the conditions associated with predation risk and the specific effects predation risk have on prey behavior is important because it has direct influences on the profitability of food items found under various conditions and states of the forager. The goals of this study were to assess how ducks perceived predation risk in various habitat types and how strongly perceived risk versus energetic demand affected foraging behavior. We manipulated food abundance in different wetland types in Illinois, USA to reduce confounding between food abundance and vegetation structure. We conducted focal‐animal behavioral samples on five duck species in treatment and control plots and used generalized linear mixed‐effects models to compare the effects of vegetation structure versus other factors on the intensity with which ducks fed and the duration of feeding stints. Mallards fed more intensively and, along with blue‐winged teal, used longer feeding stints in open habitats, consistent with the hypothesis that limited visibility was perceived to have a greater predation risk than unlimited visibility. The species temporally nearest to nesting, wood ducks, were willing to take more risks for a greater food reward, consistent with an increase in a marginal value of energy as they approached nesting. Our results indicate that some duck species value energy differently based on the surrounding vegetation structure and density. Furthermore, increases in the marginal value of energy can be more influential than perceived risk in shaping foraging behavior patterns. Based on these findings, we conclude that the value of various food items is not solely determined by energy contained in the item but by conditions in which it is found and the state of the forager.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5773304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57733042018-01-26 Indirect risk effects reduce feeding efficiency of ducks during spring Behney, Adam C. O'Shaughnessy, Ryan Eichholz, Michael W. Stafford, Joshua D. Ecol Evol Original Research Indirect risk effects of predators on prey behavior can have more of an impact on prey populations than direct consumptive effects. Predation risk can elicit more vigilance behavior in prey, reducing the amount of time available for other activities, such as foraging, which could potentially reduce foraging efficiency. Understanding the conditions associated with predation risk and the specific effects predation risk have on prey behavior is important because it has direct influences on the profitability of food items found under various conditions and states of the forager. The goals of this study were to assess how ducks perceived predation risk in various habitat types and how strongly perceived risk versus energetic demand affected foraging behavior. We manipulated food abundance in different wetland types in Illinois, USA to reduce confounding between food abundance and vegetation structure. We conducted focal‐animal behavioral samples on five duck species in treatment and control plots and used generalized linear mixed‐effects models to compare the effects of vegetation structure versus other factors on the intensity with which ducks fed and the duration of feeding stints. Mallards fed more intensively and, along with blue‐winged teal, used longer feeding stints in open habitats, consistent with the hypothesis that limited visibility was perceived to have a greater predation risk than unlimited visibility. The species temporally nearest to nesting, wood ducks, were willing to take more risks for a greater food reward, consistent with an increase in a marginal value of energy as they approached nesting. Our results indicate that some duck species value energy differently based on the surrounding vegetation structure and density. Furthermore, increases in the marginal value of energy can be more influential than perceived risk in shaping foraging behavior patterns. Based on these findings, we conclude that the value of various food items is not solely determined by energy contained in the item but by conditions in which it is found and the state of the forager. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5773304/ /pubmed/29375770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3714 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Behney, Adam C.
O'Shaughnessy, Ryan
Eichholz, Michael W.
Stafford, Joshua D.
Indirect risk effects reduce feeding efficiency of ducks during spring
title Indirect risk effects reduce feeding efficiency of ducks during spring
title_full Indirect risk effects reduce feeding efficiency of ducks during spring
title_fullStr Indirect risk effects reduce feeding efficiency of ducks during spring
title_full_unstemmed Indirect risk effects reduce feeding efficiency of ducks during spring
title_short Indirect risk effects reduce feeding efficiency of ducks during spring
title_sort indirect risk effects reduce feeding efficiency of ducks during spring
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5773304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3714
work_keys_str_mv AT behneyadamc indirectriskeffectsreducefeedingefficiencyofducksduringspring
AT oshaughnessyryan indirectriskeffectsreducefeedingefficiencyofducksduringspring
AT eichholzmichaelw indirectriskeffectsreducefeedingefficiencyofducksduringspring
AT staffordjoshuad indirectriskeffectsreducefeedingefficiencyofducksduringspring