Cargando…

To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear‐driven behaviors in lactating dolphins

In mammals, lactation can be the most energetically expensive part of the reproductive cycle. Thus, when energy needs are compromised due to predation risk, environmental disturbance, or resource scarcity, future reproductive success can be impacted. In marine and terrestrial environments, foraging...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Srinivasan, Mridula, Swannack, Todd M., Grant, William E., Rajan, Jolly, Würsig, Bernd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5773337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3732
_version_ 1783293551144075264
author Srinivasan, Mridula
Swannack, Todd M.
Grant, William E.
Rajan, Jolly
Würsig, Bernd
author_facet Srinivasan, Mridula
Swannack, Todd M.
Grant, William E.
Rajan, Jolly
Würsig, Bernd
author_sort Srinivasan, Mridula
collection PubMed
description In mammals, lactation can be the most energetically expensive part of the reproductive cycle. Thus, when energy needs are compromised due to predation risk, environmental disturbance, or resource scarcity, future reproductive success can be impacted. In marine and terrestrial environments, foraging behavior is inextricably linked to predation risk. But quantification of foraging energetics for lactating animals under predation risk is less understood. In this study, we used a spatially explicit individual‐based model to study how changes in physiology (lactating or not) and the environment (predation risk) affect optimal behavior in dolphins. Specifically, we predicted that an adult dolphin without calf would incur lower relative energetic costs compared to a lactating dolphin with calf regardless of predation risk severity, antipredator behavior, or prey quality consumed. Under this state‐dependent analysis of risk approach, we found predation risk to be a stronger driver in affecting total energetic costs (foraging plus locomotor costs) than food quality for both dolphin types. Further, contrary to our hypothesis, after accounting for raised energy demands, a lactating dolphin with calf does not necessarily have higher relative‐to‐baseline costs than a dolphin without calf. Our results indicate that both a lactating (with calf) and non‐lactating dolphin incur lowered energetic costs under a risk‐averse behavioral scheme, but consequently suffer from lost foraging calories. A lactating dolphin with calf could be particularly worse off in lost foraging calories under elevated predation risk, heightened vigilance, and increased hiding time relative to an adult dolphin without calf. Further, hiding time in refuge could be more consequential than detection distance for both dolphin types in estimated costs and losses incurred. In conclusion, our study found that reproductive status is an important consideration in analyzing risk effects in mammals, especially in animals with lengthy lactation periods and those exposed to both biological and nonbiological stressors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5773337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57733372018-01-26 To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear‐driven behaviors in lactating dolphins Srinivasan, Mridula Swannack, Todd M. Grant, William E. Rajan, Jolly Würsig, Bernd Ecol Evol Original Research In mammals, lactation can be the most energetically expensive part of the reproductive cycle. Thus, when energy needs are compromised due to predation risk, environmental disturbance, or resource scarcity, future reproductive success can be impacted. In marine and terrestrial environments, foraging behavior is inextricably linked to predation risk. But quantification of foraging energetics for lactating animals under predation risk is less understood. In this study, we used a spatially explicit individual‐based model to study how changes in physiology (lactating or not) and the environment (predation risk) affect optimal behavior in dolphins. Specifically, we predicted that an adult dolphin without calf would incur lower relative energetic costs compared to a lactating dolphin with calf regardless of predation risk severity, antipredator behavior, or prey quality consumed. Under this state‐dependent analysis of risk approach, we found predation risk to be a stronger driver in affecting total energetic costs (foraging plus locomotor costs) than food quality for both dolphin types. Further, contrary to our hypothesis, after accounting for raised energy demands, a lactating dolphin with calf does not necessarily have higher relative‐to‐baseline costs than a dolphin without calf. Our results indicate that both a lactating (with calf) and non‐lactating dolphin incur lowered energetic costs under a risk‐averse behavioral scheme, but consequently suffer from lost foraging calories. A lactating dolphin with calf could be particularly worse off in lost foraging calories under elevated predation risk, heightened vigilance, and increased hiding time relative to an adult dolphin without calf. Further, hiding time in refuge could be more consequential than detection distance for both dolphin types in estimated costs and losses incurred. In conclusion, our study found that reproductive status is an important consideration in analyzing risk effects in mammals, especially in animals with lengthy lactation periods and those exposed to both biological and nonbiological stressors. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5773337/ /pubmed/29375805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3732 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Srinivasan, Mridula
Swannack, Todd M.
Grant, William E.
Rajan, Jolly
Würsig, Bernd
To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear‐driven behaviors in lactating dolphins
title To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear‐driven behaviors in lactating dolphins
title_full To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear‐driven behaviors in lactating dolphins
title_fullStr To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear‐driven behaviors in lactating dolphins
title_full_unstemmed To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear‐driven behaviors in lactating dolphins
title_short To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear‐driven behaviors in lactating dolphins
title_sort to feed or not to feed? bioenergetic impacts of fear‐driven behaviors in lactating dolphins
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5773337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3732
work_keys_str_mv AT srinivasanmridula tofeedornottofeedbioenergeticimpactsoffeardrivenbehaviorsinlactatingdolphins
AT swannacktoddm tofeedornottofeedbioenergeticimpactsoffeardrivenbehaviorsinlactatingdolphins
AT grantwilliame tofeedornottofeedbioenergeticimpactsoffeardrivenbehaviorsinlactatingdolphins
AT rajanjolly tofeedornottofeedbioenergeticimpactsoffeardrivenbehaviorsinlactatingdolphins
AT wursigbernd tofeedornottofeedbioenergeticimpactsoffeardrivenbehaviorsinlactatingdolphins