Cargando…
To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear‐driven behaviors in lactating dolphins
In mammals, lactation can be the most energetically expensive part of the reproductive cycle. Thus, when energy needs are compromised due to predation risk, environmental disturbance, or resource scarcity, future reproductive success can be impacted. In marine and terrestrial environments, foraging...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5773337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3732 |
_version_ | 1783293551144075264 |
---|---|
author | Srinivasan, Mridula Swannack, Todd M. Grant, William E. Rajan, Jolly Würsig, Bernd |
author_facet | Srinivasan, Mridula Swannack, Todd M. Grant, William E. Rajan, Jolly Würsig, Bernd |
author_sort | Srinivasan, Mridula |
collection | PubMed |
description | In mammals, lactation can be the most energetically expensive part of the reproductive cycle. Thus, when energy needs are compromised due to predation risk, environmental disturbance, or resource scarcity, future reproductive success can be impacted. In marine and terrestrial environments, foraging behavior is inextricably linked to predation risk. But quantification of foraging energetics for lactating animals under predation risk is less understood. In this study, we used a spatially explicit individual‐based model to study how changes in physiology (lactating or not) and the environment (predation risk) affect optimal behavior in dolphins. Specifically, we predicted that an adult dolphin without calf would incur lower relative energetic costs compared to a lactating dolphin with calf regardless of predation risk severity, antipredator behavior, or prey quality consumed. Under this state‐dependent analysis of risk approach, we found predation risk to be a stronger driver in affecting total energetic costs (foraging plus locomotor costs) than food quality for both dolphin types. Further, contrary to our hypothesis, after accounting for raised energy demands, a lactating dolphin with calf does not necessarily have higher relative‐to‐baseline costs than a dolphin without calf. Our results indicate that both a lactating (with calf) and non‐lactating dolphin incur lowered energetic costs under a risk‐averse behavioral scheme, but consequently suffer from lost foraging calories. A lactating dolphin with calf could be particularly worse off in lost foraging calories under elevated predation risk, heightened vigilance, and increased hiding time relative to an adult dolphin without calf. Further, hiding time in refuge could be more consequential than detection distance for both dolphin types in estimated costs and losses incurred. In conclusion, our study found that reproductive status is an important consideration in analyzing risk effects in mammals, especially in animals with lengthy lactation periods and those exposed to both biological and nonbiological stressors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5773337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57733372018-01-26 To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear‐driven behaviors in lactating dolphins Srinivasan, Mridula Swannack, Todd M. Grant, William E. Rajan, Jolly Würsig, Bernd Ecol Evol Original Research In mammals, lactation can be the most energetically expensive part of the reproductive cycle. Thus, when energy needs are compromised due to predation risk, environmental disturbance, or resource scarcity, future reproductive success can be impacted. In marine and terrestrial environments, foraging behavior is inextricably linked to predation risk. But quantification of foraging energetics for lactating animals under predation risk is less understood. In this study, we used a spatially explicit individual‐based model to study how changes in physiology (lactating or not) and the environment (predation risk) affect optimal behavior in dolphins. Specifically, we predicted that an adult dolphin without calf would incur lower relative energetic costs compared to a lactating dolphin with calf regardless of predation risk severity, antipredator behavior, or prey quality consumed. Under this state‐dependent analysis of risk approach, we found predation risk to be a stronger driver in affecting total energetic costs (foraging plus locomotor costs) than food quality for both dolphin types. Further, contrary to our hypothesis, after accounting for raised energy demands, a lactating dolphin with calf does not necessarily have higher relative‐to‐baseline costs than a dolphin without calf. Our results indicate that both a lactating (with calf) and non‐lactating dolphin incur lowered energetic costs under a risk‐averse behavioral scheme, but consequently suffer from lost foraging calories. A lactating dolphin with calf could be particularly worse off in lost foraging calories under elevated predation risk, heightened vigilance, and increased hiding time relative to an adult dolphin without calf. Further, hiding time in refuge could be more consequential than detection distance for both dolphin types in estimated costs and losses incurred. In conclusion, our study found that reproductive status is an important consideration in analyzing risk effects in mammals, especially in animals with lengthy lactation periods and those exposed to both biological and nonbiological stressors. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5773337/ /pubmed/29375805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3732 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Srinivasan, Mridula Swannack, Todd M. Grant, William E. Rajan, Jolly Würsig, Bernd To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear‐driven behaviors in lactating dolphins |
title | To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear‐driven behaviors in lactating dolphins |
title_full | To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear‐driven behaviors in lactating dolphins |
title_fullStr | To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear‐driven behaviors in lactating dolphins |
title_full_unstemmed | To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear‐driven behaviors in lactating dolphins |
title_short | To feed or not to feed? Bioenergetic impacts of fear‐driven behaviors in lactating dolphins |
title_sort | to feed or not to feed? bioenergetic impacts of fear‐driven behaviors in lactating dolphins |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5773337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3732 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT srinivasanmridula tofeedornottofeedbioenergeticimpactsoffeardrivenbehaviorsinlactatingdolphins AT swannacktoddm tofeedornottofeedbioenergeticimpactsoffeardrivenbehaviorsinlactatingdolphins AT grantwilliame tofeedornottofeedbioenergeticimpactsoffeardrivenbehaviorsinlactatingdolphins AT rajanjolly tofeedornottofeedbioenergeticimpactsoffeardrivenbehaviorsinlactatingdolphins AT wursigbernd tofeedornottofeedbioenergeticimpactsoffeardrivenbehaviorsinlactatingdolphins |