Cargando…
How can and should we optimize extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
It is well recognized that the popularity of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), despite its non-invasive character, has decreased during recent years. This is partly explained by the technological achievements in endoscopy and urologists’ enthusiasm for such procedures. Another explanation...
Autores principales: | Chaussy, Christian G., Tiselius, Hans-Göran |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5773650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29177561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-1020-z |
Ejemplares similares
-
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower pole calculi smaller than one centimeter
por: Chaussy, Christian, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Renal Rupture Following Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy
por: Torbati, Sam S., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy of Primary Intrahepatic Stones
por: Kim, Myung Hwan, et al.
Publicado: (1992) -
The treatment of the reno-ureteral calculi by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL)
por: Ceban, E
Publicado: (2012) -
Long-term effects of pediatric extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy on renal function
por: Akin, Yigit, et al.
Publicado: (2014)