Cargando…

Current pesticide dietary risk assessment in light of comparable animal study NOAELs after chronic and short-termed exposure durations

Dietary risk assessment (DRA) of pesticides includes the estimation of chronic and acute exposures from crop residues, but assesses acute exposures only for pesticides with an acute reference dose (ARfD). Acute estimation uses high percentiles of food consumption surveys which are considerably highe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zarn, Jürg A., O’Brien, Caitlyn D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5773667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28929275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-017-2052-4
_version_ 1783293610636083200
author Zarn, Jürg A.
O’Brien, Caitlyn D.
author_facet Zarn, Jürg A.
O’Brien, Caitlyn D.
author_sort Zarn, Jürg A.
collection PubMed
description Dietary risk assessment (DRA) of pesticides includes the estimation of chronic and acute exposures from crop residues, but assesses acute exposures only for pesticides with an acute reference dose (ARfD). Acute estimation uses high percentiles of food consumption surveys which are considerably higher than per capita lifetime averaged food consumption values which are used for chronic estimations. Assessing acute risks only for pesticides with an ARfD tacitly assumes that chronic risk assessment covers also intermittent occurring exposures which could significantly exceed chronic estimates. The present investigation conducted on 2200 rat studies from 436 pesticides provides evidence demonstrating that pesticides with and without ARfD have no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) which remain statistically unchanged in developmental, subacute, subchronic, reproductive and chronic toxicity studies covering exposure durations between 2 and 104 weeks. DRA of pesticides without ARfD needs reconsideration in light of equally high toxic dose levels after short- and long-term exposures, suggesting that intermittent exposures could be toxic, if they repeatedly exceed the acceptable chronic daily intake (ADI; conceptually the human counterpart of chronic animal NOAEL). As such risks are currently not assessed for pesticides without ARfD, the current DRA concept, which automatically presumes the use of low chronic exposure estimates entirely covers the risks of not acutely toxic pesticides, needs reconsideration. Furthermore, risks to intermittent occurring high exposures are probably also insufficiently assessed for pesticides where the ARfD is significantly higher than the ADI. As an example, the maximum residue limit for bifenazate in peaches is discussed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00204-017-2052-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5773667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57736672018-01-30 Current pesticide dietary risk assessment in light of comparable animal study NOAELs after chronic and short-termed exposure durations Zarn, Jürg A. O’Brien, Caitlyn D. Arch Toxicol Regulatory Toxicology Dietary risk assessment (DRA) of pesticides includes the estimation of chronic and acute exposures from crop residues, but assesses acute exposures only for pesticides with an acute reference dose (ARfD). Acute estimation uses high percentiles of food consumption surveys which are considerably higher than per capita lifetime averaged food consumption values which are used for chronic estimations. Assessing acute risks only for pesticides with an ARfD tacitly assumes that chronic risk assessment covers also intermittent occurring exposures which could significantly exceed chronic estimates. The present investigation conducted on 2200 rat studies from 436 pesticides provides evidence demonstrating that pesticides with and without ARfD have no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) which remain statistically unchanged in developmental, subacute, subchronic, reproductive and chronic toxicity studies covering exposure durations between 2 and 104 weeks. DRA of pesticides without ARfD needs reconsideration in light of equally high toxic dose levels after short- and long-term exposures, suggesting that intermittent exposures could be toxic, if they repeatedly exceed the acceptable chronic daily intake (ADI; conceptually the human counterpart of chronic animal NOAEL). As such risks are currently not assessed for pesticides without ARfD, the current DRA concept, which automatically presumes the use of low chronic exposure estimates entirely covers the risks of not acutely toxic pesticides, needs reconsideration. Furthermore, risks to intermittent occurring high exposures are probably also insufficiently assessed for pesticides where the ARfD is significantly higher than the ADI. As an example, the maximum residue limit for bifenazate in peaches is discussed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00204-017-2052-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-09-19 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5773667/ /pubmed/28929275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-017-2052-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Regulatory Toxicology
Zarn, Jürg A.
O’Brien, Caitlyn D.
Current pesticide dietary risk assessment in light of comparable animal study NOAELs after chronic and short-termed exposure durations
title Current pesticide dietary risk assessment in light of comparable animal study NOAELs after chronic and short-termed exposure durations
title_full Current pesticide dietary risk assessment in light of comparable animal study NOAELs after chronic and short-termed exposure durations
title_fullStr Current pesticide dietary risk assessment in light of comparable animal study NOAELs after chronic and short-termed exposure durations
title_full_unstemmed Current pesticide dietary risk assessment in light of comparable animal study NOAELs after chronic and short-termed exposure durations
title_short Current pesticide dietary risk assessment in light of comparable animal study NOAELs after chronic and short-termed exposure durations
title_sort current pesticide dietary risk assessment in light of comparable animal study noaels after chronic and short-termed exposure durations
topic Regulatory Toxicology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5773667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28929275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-017-2052-4
work_keys_str_mv AT zarnjurga currentpesticidedietaryriskassessmentinlightofcomparableanimalstudynoaelsafterchronicandshorttermedexposuredurations
AT obriencaitlynd currentpesticidedietaryriskassessmentinlightofcomparableanimalstudynoaelsafterchronicandshorttermedexposuredurations