Cargando…
Quantification of massively parallel sequencing libraries – a comparative study of eight methods
Quantification of massively parallel sequencing libraries is important for acquisition of monoclonal beads or clusters prior to clonal amplification and to avoid large variations in library coverage when multiple samples are included in one sequencing analysis. No gold standard for quantification of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5773690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29348673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19574-w |
_version_ | 1783293616053026816 |
---|---|
author | Hussing, Christian Kampmann, Marie-Louise Mogensen, Helle Smidt Børsting, Claus Morling, Niels |
author_facet | Hussing, Christian Kampmann, Marie-Louise Mogensen, Helle Smidt Børsting, Claus Morling, Niels |
author_sort | Hussing, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quantification of massively parallel sequencing libraries is important for acquisition of monoclonal beads or clusters prior to clonal amplification and to avoid large variations in library coverage when multiple samples are included in one sequencing analysis. No gold standard for quantification of libraries exists. We assessed eight methods of quantification of libraries by quantifying 54 amplicon, six capture, and six shotgun fragment libraries. Chemically synthesized double-stranded DNA was also quantified. Light spectrophotometry, i.e. NanoDrop, was found to give the highest concentration estimates followed by Qubit and electrophoresis-based instruments (Bioanalyzer, TapeStation, GX Touch, and Fragment Analyzer), while SYBR Green and TaqMan based qPCR assays gave the lowest estimates. qPCR gave more accurate predictions of sequencing coverage than Qubit and TapeStation did. Costs, time-consumption, workflow simplicity, and ability to quantify multiple samples are discussed. Technical specifications, advantages, and disadvantages of the various methods are pointed out. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5773690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57736902018-01-26 Quantification of massively parallel sequencing libraries – a comparative study of eight methods Hussing, Christian Kampmann, Marie-Louise Mogensen, Helle Smidt Børsting, Claus Morling, Niels Sci Rep Article Quantification of massively parallel sequencing libraries is important for acquisition of monoclonal beads or clusters prior to clonal amplification and to avoid large variations in library coverage when multiple samples are included in one sequencing analysis. No gold standard for quantification of libraries exists. We assessed eight methods of quantification of libraries by quantifying 54 amplicon, six capture, and six shotgun fragment libraries. Chemically synthesized double-stranded DNA was also quantified. Light spectrophotometry, i.e. NanoDrop, was found to give the highest concentration estimates followed by Qubit and electrophoresis-based instruments (Bioanalyzer, TapeStation, GX Touch, and Fragment Analyzer), while SYBR Green and TaqMan based qPCR assays gave the lowest estimates. qPCR gave more accurate predictions of sequencing coverage than Qubit and TapeStation did. Costs, time-consumption, workflow simplicity, and ability to quantify multiple samples are discussed. Technical specifications, advantages, and disadvantages of the various methods are pointed out. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5773690/ /pubmed/29348673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19574-w Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Hussing, Christian Kampmann, Marie-Louise Mogensen, Helle Smidt Børsting, Claus Morling, Niels Quantification of massively parallel sequencing libraries – a comparative study of eight methods |
title | Quantification of massively parallel sequencing libraries – a comparative study of eight methods |
title_full | Quantification of massively parallel sequencing libraries – a comparative study of eight methods |
title_fullStr | Quantification of massively parallel sequencing libraries – a comparative study of eight methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantification of massively parallel sequencing libraries – a comparative study of eight methods |
title_short | Quantification of massively parallel sequencing libraries – a comparative study of eight methods |
title_sort | quantification of massively parallel sequencing libraries – a comparative study of eight methods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5773690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29348673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19574-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hussingchristian quantificationofmassivelyparallelsequencinglibrariesacomparativestudyofeightmethods AT kampmannmarielouise quantificationofmassivelyparallelsequencinglibrariesacomparativestudyofeightmethods AT mogensenhellesmidt quantificationofmassivelyparallelsequencinglibrariesacomparativestudyofeightmethods AT børstingclaus quantificationofmassivelyparallelsequencinglibrariesacomparativestudyofeightmethods AT morlingniels quantificationofmassivelyparallelsequencinglibrariesacomparativestudyofeightmethods |