Cargando…

Real-world experience of women using extended-cycle vs monthly-cycle combined oral contraception in the United States: the National Health and Wellness Survey

BACKGROUND: The real-world experience of women receiving extended-cycle combined oral contraception (COC) versus monthly-cycle COC has not been reported. METHODS: Data were from the United States 2013 National Health and Wellness Survey. Eligible women (18–50 years old, premenopausal, without hyster...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nappi, Rossella E., Lete, Iñaki, Lee, Lulu K., Flores, Natalia M., Micheletti, Marie-Christine, Tang, Boxiong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5774154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29347935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-017-0508-6
_version_ 1783293713987928064
author Nappi, Rossella E.
Lete, Iñaki
Lee, Lulu K.
Flores, Natalia M.
Micheletti, Marie-Christine
Tang, Boxiong
author_facet Nappi, Rossella E.
Lete, Iñaki
Lee, Lulu K.
Flores, Natalia M.
Micheletti, Marie-Christine
Tang, Boxiong
author_sort Nappi, Rossella E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The real-world experience of women receiving extended-cycle combined oral contraception (COC) versus monthly-cycle COC has not been reported. METHODS: Data were from the United States 2013 National Health and Wellness Survey. Eligible women (18–50 years old, premenopausal, without hysterectomy) currently using extended-cycle COC (3 months between periods) were compared with women using monthly-cycle COC. Treatment satisfaction (1 “extremely dissatisfied” to 7 “extremely satisfied”), adherence (8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale(©)), menstrual cycle-related symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and health state utilities (Medical Outcomes Short Form Survey-36v2®), depression (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire), sleep difficulties, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-General Health, and healthcare resource use were assessed using one-way analyses of variance, chi-square tests, and generalized linear models (adjusted for covariates). RESULTS: Participants included 260 (6.7%) women using extended-cycle and 3616 (93.3%) using monthly-cycle COC. Women using extended-cycle COC reported significantly higher treatment satisfaction (P = 0.001) and adherence (P = 0.04) and reduced heavy menstrual bleeding (P = 0.029). A non-significant tendency toward reduced menstrual pain (39.5% versus 47.3%) and menstrual cycle-related symptoms (40.0% versus 48.7%) was found in women using extended-cycle versus monthly-cycle COC. Significantly more women using extended-cycle COC reported health-related diagnoses, indicating preferential prescription for extended-cycle COC among women reporting more health problems. Consistent with this poorer health, more women using extended-cycle COC reported fatigue, headache, and activity impairment (P values < 0.05). There were no other significant differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world observational study supports extended-cycle COC as a valuable treatment option with high satisfaction, high adherence, and reduced heavy menstrual bleeding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5774154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57741542018-01-26 Real-world experience of women using extended-cycle vs monthly-cycle combined oral contraception in the United States: the National Health and Wellness Survey Nappi, Rossella E. Lete, Iñaki Lee, Lulu K. Flores, Natalia M. Micheletti, Marie-Christine Tang, Boxiong BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The real-world experience of women receiving extended-cycle combined oral contraception (COC) versus monthly-cycle COC has not been reported. METHODS: Data were from the United States 2013 National Health and Wellness Survey. Eligible women (18–50 years old, premenopausal, without hysterectomy) currently using extended-cycle COC (3 months between periods) were compared with women using monthly-cycle COC. Treatment satisfaction (1 “extremely dissatisfied” to 7 “extremely satisfied”), adherence (8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale(©)), menstrual cycle-related symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and health state utilities (Medical Outcomes Short Form Survey-36v2®), depression (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire), sleep difficulties, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-General Health, and healthcare resource use were assessed using one-way analyses of variance, chi-square tests, and generalized linear models (adjusted for covariates). RESULTS: Participants included 260 (6.7%) women using extended-cycle and 3616 (93.3%) using monthly-cycle COC. Women using extended-cycle COC reported significantly higher treatment satisfaction (P = 0.001) and adherence (P = 0.04) and reduced heavy menstrual bleeding (P = 0.029). A non-significant tendency toward reduced menstrual pain (39.5% versus 47.3%) and menstrual cycle-related symptoms (40.0% versus 48.7%) was found in women using extended-cycle versus monthly-cycle COC. Significantly more women using extended-cycle COC reported health-related diagnoses, indicating preferential prescription for extended-cycle COC among women reporting more health problems. Consistent with this poorer health, more women using extended-cycle COC reported fatigue, headache, and activity impairment (P values < 0.05). There were no other significant differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world observational study supports extended-cycle COC as a valuable treatment option with high satisfaction, high adherence, and reduced heavy menstrual bleeding. BioMed Central 2018-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5774154/ /pubmed/29347935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-017-0508-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nappi, Rossella E.
Lete, Iñaki
Lee, Lulu K.
Flores, Natalia M.
Micheletti, Marie-Christine
Tang, Boxiong
Real-world experience of women using extended-cycle vs monthly-cycle combined oral contraception in the United States: the National Health and Wellness Survey
title Real-world experience of women using extended-cycle vs monthly-cycle combined oral contraception in the United States: the National Health and Wellness Survey
title_full Real-world experience of women using extended-cycle vs monthly-cycle combined oral contraception in the United States: the National Health and Wellness Survey
title_fullStr Real-world experience of women using extended-cycle vs monthly-cycle combined oral contraception in the United States: the National Health and Wellness Survey
title_full_unstemmed Real-world experience of women using extended-cycle vs monthly-cycle combined oral contraception in the United States: the National Health and Wellness Survey
title_short Real-world experience of women using extended-cycle vs monthly-cycle combined oral contraception in the United States: the National Health and Wellness Survey
title_sort real-world experience of women using extended-cycle vs monthly-cycle combined oral contraception in the united states: the national health and wellness survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5774154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29347935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-017-0508-6
work_keys_str_mv AT nappirossellae realworldexperienceofwomenusingextendedcyclevsmonthlycyclecombinedoralcontraceptionintheunitedstatesthenationalhealthandwellnesssurvey
AT leteinaki realworldexperienceofwomenusingextendedcyclevsmonthlycyclecombinedoralcontraceptionintheunitedstatesthenationalhealthandwellnesssurvey
AT leeluluk realworldexperienceofwomenusingextendedcyclevsmonthlycyclecombinedoralcontraceptionintheunitedstatesthenationalhealthandwellnesssurvey
AT floresnataliam realworldexperienceofwomenusingextendedcyclevsmonthlycyclecombinedoralcontraceptionintheunitedstatesthenationalhealthandwellnesssurvey
AT michelettimariechristine realworldexperienceofwomenusingextendedcyclevsmonthlycyclecombinedoralcontraceptionintheunitedstatesthenationalhealthandwellnesssurvey
AT tangboxiong realworldexperienceofwomenusingextendedcyclevsmonthlycyclecombinedoralcontraceptionintheunitedstatesthenationalhealthandwellnesssurvey