Cargando…

What should be included in the assessment of laypersons’ paediatric basic life support skills? Results from a Delphi consensus study

BACKGROUND: Assessment of laypersons’ Paediatric Basic Life Support (PBLS) skills is important to ensure acquisition of effective PBLS competencies. However limited evidence exists on which PBLS skills are essential for laypersons. The same challenges exist with respect to the assessment of foreign...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasselager, Asbjørn Børch, Lauritsen, Torsten, Kristensen, Tim, Bohnstedt, Cathrine, Sønderskov, Claus, Østergaard, Doris, Tolsgaard, Martin Grønnebæk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5774155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29347956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0474-5
_version_ 1783293714245877760
author Hasselager, Asbjørn Børch
Lauritsen, Torsten
Kristensen, Tim
Bohnstedt, Cathrine
Sønderskov, Claus
Østergaard, Doris
Tolsgaard, Martin Grønnebæk
author_facet Hasselager, Asbjørn Børch
Lauritsen, Torsten
Kristensen, Tim
Bohnstedt, Cathrine
Sønderskov, Claus
Østergaard, Doris
Tolsgaard, Martin Grønnebæk
author_sort Hasselager, Asbjørn Børch
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assessment of laypersons’ Paediatric Basic Life Support (PBLS) skills is important to ensure acquisition of effective PBLS competencies. However limited evidence exists on which PBLS skills are essential for laypersons. The same challenges exist with respect to the assessment of foreign body airway obstruction management (FBAOM) skills. We aimed to establish international consensus on how to assess laypersons’ PBLS and FBAOM skills. METHODS: A Delphi consensus survey was conducted. Out of a total of 84 invited experts, 28 agreed to participate. During the first Delphi round experts suggested items to assess laypersons’ PBLS and FBAOM skills. In the second round, the suggested items received comments from and were rated by 26 experts (93%) on a 5-point scale (1 = not relevant to 5 = essential). Revised items were anonymously presented in a third round for comments and 23 (82%) experts completed a re-rating. Items with a score above 3 by more than 80% of the experts in the third round were included in an assessment instrument. RESULTS: In the first round, 19 and 15 items were identified to assess PBLS and FBAOM skills, respectively. The ratings and comments from the last two rounds resulted in nine and eight essential assessment items for PBLS and FBAOM skills, respectively. The PBLS items included: “Responsiveness”,” Call for help”, “Open airway”,” Check breathing”, “Rescue breaths”, “Compressions”, “Ventilations“, “Time factor” and “Use of AED”. The FBAOM items included: “Identify different stages of foreign body airway obstruction”, “Identify consciousness”, “Call for help”, “Back blows“, “Chest thrusts/abdominal thrusts according to age”, “Identify loss of consciousness and change to CPR”, “Assessment of breathing” and “Ventilation”. DISCUSSION: For assessment of laypersons some PBLS and FBAOM skills described in guidelines are more important than others. Four out of nine of PBLS skills focus on airway and breathing skills, supporting the major importance of these skills for laypersons’ resuscitation attempts. CONCLUSIONS: International consensus on how to assess laypersons’ paediatric basic life support and foreign body airway obstruction management skills was established. The assessment of these skills may help to determine when laypersons have acquired competencies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13049-018-0474-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5774155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57741552018-01-26 What should be included in the assessment of laypersons’ paediatric basic life support skills? Results from a Delphi consensus study Hasselager, Asbjørn Børch Lauritsen, Torsten Kristensen, Tim Bohnstedt, Cathrine Sønderskov, Claus Østergaard, Doris Tolsgaard, Martin Grønnebæk Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Assessment of laypersons’ Paediatric Basic Life Support (PBLS) skills is important to ensure acquisition of effective PBLS competencies. However limited evidence exists on which PBLS skills are essential for laypersons. The same challenges exist with respect to the assessment of foreign body airway obstruction management (FBAOM) skills. We aimed to establish international consensus on how to assess laypersons’ PBLS and FBAOM skills. METHODS: A Delphi consensus survey was conducted. Out of a total of 84 invited experts, 28 agreed to participate. During the first Delphi round experts suggested items to assess laypersons’ PBLS and FBAOM skills. In the second round, the suggested items received comments from and were rated by 26 experts (93%) on a 5-point scale (1 = not relevant to 5 = essential). Revised items were anonymously presented in a third round for comments and 23 (82%) experts completed a re-rating. Items with a score above 3 by more than 80% of the experts in the third round were included in an assessment instrument. RESULTS: In the first round, 19 and 15 items were identified to assess PBLS and FBAOM skills, respectively. The ratings and comments from the last two rounds resulted in nine and eight essential assessment items for PBLS and FBAOM skills, respectively. The PBLS items included: “Responsiveness”,” Call for help”, “Open airway”,” Check breathing”, “Rescue breaths”, “Compressions”, “Ventilations“, “Time factor” and “Use of AED”. The FBAOM items included: “Identify different stages of foreign body airway obstruction”, “Identify consciousness”, “Call for help”, “Back blows“, “Chest thrusts/abdominal thrusts according to age”, “Identify loss of consciousness and change to CPR”, “Assessment of breathing” and “Ventilation”. DISCUSSION: For assessment of laypersons some PBLS and FBAOM skills described in guidelines are more important than others. Four out of nine of PBLS skills focus on airway and breathing skills, supporting the major importance of these skills for laypersons’ resuscitation attempts. CONCLUSIONS: International consensus on how to assess laypersons’ paediatric basic life support and foreign body airway obstruction management skills was established. The assessment of these skills may help to determine when laypersons have acquired competencies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13049-018-0474-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5774155/ /pubmed/29347956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0474-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hasselager, Asbjørn Børch
Lauritsen, Torsten
Kristensen, Tim
Bohnstedt, Cathrine
Sønderskov, Claus
Østergaard, Doris
Tolsgaard, Martin Grønnebæk
What should be included in the assessment of laypersons’ paediatric basic life support skills? Results from a Delphi consensus study
title What should be included in the assessment of laypersons’ paediatric basic life support skills? Results from a Delphi consensus study
title_full What should be included in the assessment of laypersons’ paediatric basic life support skills? Results from a Delphi consensus study
title_fullStr What should be included in the assessment of laypersons’ paediatric basic life support skills? Results from a Delphi consensus study
title_full_unstemmed What should be included in the assessment of laypersons’ paediatric basic life support skills? Results from a Delphi consensus study
title_short What should be included in the assessment of laypersons’ paediatric basic life support skills? Results from a Delphi consensus study
title_sort what should be included in the assessment of laypersons’ paediatric basic life support skills? results from a delphi consensus study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5774155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29347956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0474-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hasselagerasbjørnbørch whatshouldbeincludedintheassessmentoflaypersonspaediatricbasiclifesupportskillsresultsfromadelphiconsensusstudy
AT lauritsentorsten whatshouldbeincludedintheassessmentoflaypersonspaediatricbasiclifesupportskillsresultsfromadelphiconsensusstudy
AT kristensentim whatshouldbeincludedintheassessmentoflaypersonspaediatricbasiclifesupportskillsresultsfromadelphiconsensusstudy
AT bohnstedtcathrine whatshouldbeincludedintheassessmentoflaypersonspaediatricbasiclifesupportskillsresultsfromadelphiconsensusstudy
AT sønderskovclaus whatshouldbeincludedintheassessmentoflaypersonspaediatricbasiclifesupportskillsresultsfromadelphiconsensusstudy
AT østergaarddoris whatshouldbeincludedintheassessmentoflaypersonspaediatricbasiclifesupportskillsresultsfromadelphiconsensusstudy
AT tolsgaardmartingrønnebæk whatshouldbeincludedintheassessmentoflaypersonspaediatricbasiclifesupportskillsresultsfromadelphiconsensusstudy