Cargando…

Methods for Population-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons in Health Technology Appraisal

Standard methods for indirect comparisons and network meta-analysis are based on aggregate data, with the key assumption that there is no difference between the trials in the distribution of effect-modifying variables. Methods which relax this assumption are becoming increasingly common for submissi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Phillippo, David M., Ades, Anthony E., Dias, Sofia, Palmer, Stephen, Abrams, Keith R., Welton, Nicky J.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:	Original Articles
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5774635/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28823204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X17725740

Ejemplares similares

Assessing the performance of population adjustment methods for anchored indirect comparisons: A simulation study
por: Phillippo, David M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Equivalence of entropy balancing and the method of moments for matching‐adjusted indirect comparison
por: Phillippo, David M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Target estimands for efficient decision making: Response to comments on “Assessing the performance of population adjustment methods for anchored indirect comparisons: A simulation study”
por: Phillippo, David M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

External validity of rct evidence in cost-effectiveness analyses. A review of recent technology appraisals for nice and proposed methods of adjustment
por: Mantopoulos, Theodoros, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Multilevel network meta‐regression for population‐adjusted treatment comparisons
por: Phillippo, David M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Validating the Assumptions of Population Adjustment: Application of Multilevel Network Meta-regression to a Network of Treatments for Plaque Psoriasis
por: Phillippo, David M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Sensitivity of treatment recommendations to bias in network meta‐analysis
por: Phillippo, David M., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 3: Heterogeneity—Subgroups, Meta-Regression, Bias, and Bias-Adjustment
por: Dias, Sofia, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

A Critical Appraisal of Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons in Spinal Muscular Atrophy
por: Jiang, Tammy, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 5: The Baseline Natural History Model
por: Dias, Sofia, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 6: Embedding Evidence Synthesis in Probabilistic Cost-effectiveness Analysis
por: Dias, Sofia, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2: A Generalized Linear Modeling Framework for Pairwise and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
por: Dias, Sofia, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 1: Introduction
por: Dias, Sofia, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Automated generation of node‐splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta‐analysis
por: van Valkenhoef, Gert, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Extending Treatment Networks in Health Technology Assessment: How Far Should We Go?
por: Caldwell, Deborah M., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Automated methods to test connectedness and quantify indirectness of evidence in network meta‐analysis
por: Thom, Howard, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Development of a method for adjusting trial results for biases in meta-analysis
por: Turner, Rebecca, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 7: A Reviewer’s Checklist
por: Ades, A. E., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 4: Inconsistency in Networks of Evidence Based on Randomized Controlled Trials
por: Dias, Sofia, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Two-stage matching-adjusted indirect comparison
por: Remiro-Azócar, Antonio
Publicado: (2022)

Accounting for Heterogeneity in Relative Treatment Effects for Use in Cost-Effectiveness Models and Value-of-Information Analyses
por: Welton, Nicky J., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Improving the Estimation of Subgroup Effects for Clinical Trial Participants with Multimorbidity by Incorporating Drug Class-Level Information in Bayesian Hierarchical Models: A Simulation Study
por: Hannigan, Laurie J., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Assessment of regression-based methods to adjust for publication bias through a comprehensive simulation study
por: Moreno, Santiago G, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Correction: Two-stage matching-adjusted indirect comparison
por: Remiro‑Azócar, Antonio
Publicado: (2022)

A threshold analysis assessed the credibility of conclusions from network meta-analysis
por: Caldwell, Deborah M., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves
por: Guyot, Patricia, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Assessing the consistency assumptions underlying network meta‐regression using aggregate data
por: Donegan, Sarah, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Blinatumomab vs. Inotuzumab Ozogamicin for Adults with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
por: Song, Jinlin, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Evaluation of methods to adjust for treatment switching in clinical trials
por: Fox, Richard, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Proportion of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Cases Caused by Chlamydia trachomatis: Consistent Picture From Different Methods
por: Price, Malcolm J., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Recapture or Precapture? Fallibility of Standard Capture-Recapture Methods in the Presence of Referrals Between Sources
por: Jones, Hayley E., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Extrapolation of Survival Curves from Cancer Trials Using External Information
por: Guyot, Patricia, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A Mixed Method Study of Teachers' Appraisals of Student Wellness Services and Supports During COVID‐19
por: Childs, Tasha M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Use of a random effects meta‐analysis in the design and analysis of a new clinical trial
por: Jones, Hayley E., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Can Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison Methods Mitigate Placebo Response Differences Among Patient Populations in Adjunctive Trials of Brivaracetam and Levetiracetam?
por: Swallow, Elyse, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Strategies for Efficient Computation of the Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information
por: Madan, Jason, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparative Effectiveness of Adalimumab versus Secukinumab for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison
por: Strand, Vibeke, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Upadacitinib Versus Tofacitinib in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis
por: Edwards, Christopher J., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Incorporating multiple interventions in meta-analysis: an evaluation of the mixed treatment comparison with the adjusted indirect comparison
por: O'Regan, Christopher, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Outcomes reported in trials of methods for the induction of labour
por: Medley, Nancy, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_5dq426vtdf253o4a82hig5ig0q