Cargando…

Seasonal variation in environmental DNA detection in sediment and water samples

The use of aquatic environmental DNA (eDNA) to detect the presence of species depends on the seasonal activity of the species in the sampled habitat. eDNA may persist in sediments for longer than it does in water, and analysing sediment could potentially extend the seasonal window for species assess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buxton, Andrew S., Groombridge, Jim J., Griffiths, Richard A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5774844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29352294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191737
_version_ 1783293824688193536
author Buxton, Andrew S.
Groombridge, Jim J.
Griffiths, Richard A.
author_facet Buxton, Andrew S.
Groombridge, Jim J.
Griffiths, Richard A.
author_sort Buxton, Andrew S.
collection PubMed
description The use of aquatic environmental DNA (eDNA) to detect the presence of species depends on the seasonal activity of the species in the sampled habitat. eDNA may persist in sediments for longer than it does in water, and analysing sediment could potentially extend the seasonal window for species assessment. Using the great crested newt as a model, we compare how detection probability changes across the seasons in eDNA samples collected from both pond water and pond sediments. Detection of both aquatic and sedimentary eDNA varied through the year, peaking in the summer (July), with its lowest point in the winter (January): in all seasons, detection probability of eDNA from water exceeded that from sediment. Detection probability of eDNA also varied between study areas, and according to great crested newt habitat suitability and sediment type. As aquatic and sedimentary eDNA show the same seasonal fluctuations, the patterns observed in both sample types likely reflect current or recent presence of the target species. However, given the low detection probabilities found in the autumn and winter we would not recommend using either aquatic or sedimentary eDNA for year-round sampling without further refinement and testing of the methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5774844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57748442018-02-05 Seasonal variation in environmental DNA detection in sediment and water samples Buxton, Andrew S. Groombridge, Jim J. Griffiths, Richard A. PLoS One Research Article The use of aquatic environmental DNA (eDNA) to detect the presence of species depends on the seasonal activity of the species in the sampled habitat. eDNA may persist in sediments for longer than it does in water, and analysing sediment could potentially extend the seasonal window for species assessment. Using the great crested newt as a model, we compare how detection probability changes across the seasons in eDNA samples collected from both pond water and pond sediments. Detection of both aquatic and sedimentary eDNA varied through the year, peaking in the summer (July), with its lowest point in the winter (January): in all seasons, detection probability of eDNA from water exceeded that from sediment. Detection probability of eDNA also varied between study areas, and according to great crested newt habitat suitability and sediment type. As aquatic and sedimentary eDNA show the same seasonal fluctuations, the patterns observed in both sample types likely reflect current or recent presence of the target species. However, given the low detection probabilities found in the autumn and winter we would not recommend using either aquatic or sedimentary eDNA for year-round sampling without further refinement and testing of the methods. Public Library of Science 2018-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5774844/ /pubmed/29352294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191737 Text en © 2018 Buxton et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Buxton, Andrew S.
Groombridge, Jim J.
Griffiths, Richard A.
Seasonal variation in environmental DNA detection in sediment and water samples
title Seasonal variation in environmental DNA detection in sediment and water samples
title_full Seasonal variation in environmental DNA detection in sediment and water samples
title_fullStr Seasonal variation in environmental DNA detection in sediment and water samples
title_full_unstemmed Seasonal variation in environmental DNA detection in sediment and water samples
title_short Seasonal variation in environmental DNA detection in sediment and water samples
title_sort seasonal variation in environmental dna detection in sediment and water samples
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5774844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29352294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191737
work_keys_str_mv AT buxtonandrews seasonalvariationinenvironmentaldnadetectioninsedimentandwatersamples
AT groombridgejimj seasonalvariationinenvironmentaldnadetectioninsedimentandwatersamples
AT griffithsricharda seasonalvariationinenvironmentaldnadetectioninsedimentandwatersamples