Cargando…
Disagreements between central clinical events committee and site investigator assessments of myocardial infarction endpoints in an international clinical trial: review of the PURSUIT study
BACKGROUND: Limited information has been published regarding how specific processes for event adjudication can affect event rates in trials. We reviewed nonfatal myocardial infarctions (MIs) reported by site investigators in the international Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Recept...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2001
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC57750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11806794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-4-187 |
_version_ | 1782120050428215296 |
---|---|
author | Mahaffey, Kenneth W Harrington, Robert A Akkerhuis, Martijn Kleiman, Neal S Berdan, Lisa G Crenshaw, Brian S Tardiff, Barbara E Granger, Christopher B DeJong, Ingrid Bhapkar, Manju Widimsky, Petr Corbalon, Ramón Lee, Kerry L Deckers, Jaap W Simoons, Maarten L Topol, Eric J Califf, Robert M |
author_facet | Mahaffey, Kenneth W Harrington, Robert A Akkerhuis, Martijn Kleiman, Neal S Berdan, Lisa G Crenshaw, Brian S Tardiff, Barbara E Granger, Christopher B DeJong, Ingrid Bhapkar, Manju Widimsky, Petr Corbalon, Ramón Lee, Kerry L Deckers, Jaap W Simoons, Maarten L Topol, Eric J Califf, Robert M |
author_sort | Mahaffey, Kenneth W |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Limited information has been published regarding how specific processes for event adjudication can affect event rates in trials. We reviewed nonfatal myocardial infarctions (MIs) reported by site investigators in the international Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin (Eptifibatide) Therapy (PURSUIT) trial and those adjudicated by a central clinical events committee (CEC) to determine the reasons for differences in event rates. METHODS: The PURSUIT trial randomised 10,948 patients with acute coronary syndromes to receive eptifibatide or placebo. The primary end-point was death or post-enrolment MI at 30 days as assessed by the CEC; this end-point was also constructed using site-reported events. The CEC identified suspected MIs by systematic review of clinical, cardiac enzyme, and electrocardiographic data. RESULTS: The CEC identified 5005 (46%) suspected events, of which 1415 (28%) were adjudicated as MI. The site investigator and CEC assessments of whether a MI had occurred disagreed in 983 (20%) of the 5005 patients with suspected MI, mostly reflecting site misclassification of post-enrolment MIs (as enrolment MIs) or underreported periprocedural MIs. Patients for whom the CEC and site investigator agreed that no end-point MI had occurred had the lowest mortality at 30 days and between 30 days and 6 months, and those with agreement that a MI had occurred had the highest mortality. CONCLUSION: CEC adjudication provides a standard, systematic, independent, and unbiased assessment of end-points, particularly for trials that span geographic regions and clinical practice settings. Understanding the review process and reasons for disagreement between CEC and site investigator assessments of MI is important to design future trials and interpret event rates between trials. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-57750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2001 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-577502001-10-10 Disagreements between central clinical events committee and site investigator assessments of myocardial infarction endpoints in an international clinical trial: review of the PURSUIT study Mahaffey, Kenneth W Harrington, Robert A Akkerhuis, Martijn Kleiman, Neal S Berdan, Lisa G Crenshaw, Brian S Tardiff, Barbara E Granger, Christopher B DeJong, Ingrid Bhapkar, Manju Widimsky, Petr Corbalon, Ramón Lee, Kerry L Deckers, Jaap W Simoons, Maarten L Topol, Eric J Califf, Robert M Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med Research BACKGROUND: Limited information has been published regarding how specific processes for event adjudication can affect event rates in trials. We reviewed nonfatal myocardial infarctions (MIs) reported by site investigators in the international Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin (Eptifibatide) Therapy (PURSUIT) trial and those adjudicated by a central clinical events committee (CEC) to determine the reasons for differences in event rates. METHODS: The PURSUIT trial randomised 10,948 patients with acute coronary syndromes to receive eptifibatide or placebo. The primary end-point was death or post-enrolment MI at 30 days as assessed by the CEC; this end-point was also constructed using site-reported events. The CEC identified suspected MIs by systematic review of clinical, cardiac enzyme, and electrocardiographic data. RESULTS: The CEC identified 5005 (46%) suspected events, of which 1415 (28%) were adjudicated as MI. The site investigator and CEC assessments of whether a MI had occurred disagreed in 983 (20%) of the 5005 patients with suspected MI, mostly reflecting site misclassification of post-enrolment MIs (as enrolment MIs) or underreported periprocedural MIs. Patients for whom the CEC and site investigator agreed that no end-point MI had occurred had the lowest mortality at 30 days and between 30 days and 6 months, and those with agreement that a MI had occurred had the highest mortality. CONCLUSION: CEC adjudication provides a standard, systematic, independent, and unbiased assessment of end-points, particularly for trials that span geographic regions and clinical practice settings. Understanding the review process and reasons for disagreement between CEC and site investigator assessments of MI is important to design future trials and interpret event rates between trials. BioMed Central 2001 2001-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC57750/ /pubmed/11806794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-4-187 Text en Copyright © 2001 Mahaffey et al, licensee BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Research Mahaffey, Kenneth W Harrington, Robert A Akkerhuis, Martijn Kleiman, Neal S Berdan, Lisa G Crenshaw, Brian S Tardiff, Barbara E Granger, Christopher B DeJong, Ingrid Bhapkar, Manju Widimsky, Petr Corbalon, Ramón Lee, Kerry L Deckers, Jaap W Simoons, Maarten L Topol, Eric J Califf, Robert M Disagreements between central clinical events committee and site investigator assessments of myocardial infarction endpoints in an international clinical trial: review of the PURSUIT study |
title | Disagreements between central clinical events committee and site investigator assessments of myocardial infarction endpoints in an international clinical trial: review of the PURSUIT study |
title_full | Disagreements between central clinical events committee and site investigator assessments of myocardial infarction endpoints in an international clinical trial: review of the PURSUIT study |
title_fullStr | Disagreements between central clinical events committee and site investigator assessments of myocardial infarction endpoints in an international clinical trial: review of the PURSUIT study |
title_full_unstemmed | Disagreements between central clinical events committee and site investigator assessments of myocardial infarction endpoints in an international clinical trial: review of the PURSUIT study |
title_short | Disagreements between central clinical events committee and site investigator assessments of myocardial infarction endpoints in an international clinical trial: review of the PURSUIT study |
title_sort | disagreements between central clinical events committee and site investigator assessments of myocardial infarction endpoints in an international clinical trial: review of the pursuit study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC57750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11806794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-4-187 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahaffeykennethw disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy AT harringtonroberta disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy AT akkerhuismartijn disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy AT kleimanneals disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy AT berdanlisag disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy AT crenshawbrians disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy AT tardiffbarbarae disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy AT grangerchristopherb disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy AT dejongingrid disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy AT bhapkarmanju disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy AT widimskypetr disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy AT corbalonramon disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy AT leekerryl disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy AT deckersjaapw disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy AT simoonsmaartenl disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy AT topolericj disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy AT califfrobertm disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy AT disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy |