Cargando…

Disagreements between central clinical events committee and site investigator assessments of myocardial infarction endpoints in an international clinical trial: review of the PURSUIT study

BACKGROUND: Limited information has been published regarding how specific processes for event adjudication can affect event rates in trials. We reviewed nonfatal myocardial infarctions (MIs) reported by site investigators in the international Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Recept...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahaffey, Kenneth W, Harrington, Robert A, Akkerhuis, Martijn, Kleiman, Neal S, Berdan, Lisa G, Crenshaw, Brian S, Tardiff, Barbara E, Granger, Christopher B, DeJong, Ingrid, Bhapkar, Manju, Widimsky, Petr, Corbalon, Ramón, Lee, Kerry L, Deckers, Jaap W, Simoons, Maarten L, Topol, Eric J, Califf, Robert M
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC57750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11806794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-4-187
_version_ 1782120050428215296
author Mahaffey, Kenneth W
Harrington, Robert A
Akkerhuis, Martijn
Kleiman, Neal S
Berdan, Lisa G
Crenshaw, Brian S
Tardiff, Barbara E
Granger, Christopher B
DeJong, Ingrid
Bhapkar, Manju
Widimsky, Petr
Corbalon, Ramón
Lee, Kerry L
Deckers, Jaap W
Simoons, Maarten L
Topol, Eric J
Califf, Robert M
author_facet Mahaffey, Kenneth W
Harrington, Robert A
Akkerhuis, Martijn
Kleiman, Neal S
Berdan, Lisa G
Crenshaw, Brian S
Tardiff, Barbara E
Granger, Christopher B
DeJong, Ingrid
Bhapkar, Manju
Widimsky, Petr
Corbalon, Ramón
Lee, Kerry L
Deckers, Jaap W
Simoons, Maarten L
Topol, Eric J
Califf, Robert M
author_sort Mahaffey, Kenneth W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Limited information has been published regarding how specific processes for event adjudication can affect event rates in trials. We reviewed nonfatal myocardial infarctions (MIs) reported by site investigators in the international Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin (Eptifibatide) Therapy (PURSUIT) trial and those adjudicated by a central clinical events committee (CEC) to determine the reasons for differences in event rates. METHODS: The PURSUIT trial randomised 10,948 patients with acute coronary syndromes to receive eptifibatide or placebo. The primary end-point was death or post-enrolment MI at 30 days as assessed by the CEC; this end-point was also constructed using site-reported events. The CEC identified suspected MIs by systematic review of clinical, cardiac enzyme, and electrocardiographic data. RESULTS: The CEC identified 5005 (46%) suspected events, of which 1415 (28%) were adjudicated as MI. The site investigator and CEC assessments of whether a MI had occurred disagreed in 983 (20%) of the 5005 patients with suspected MI, mostly reflecting site misclassification of post-enrolment MIs (as enrolment MIs) or underreported periprocedural MIs. Patients for whom the CEC and site investigator agreed that no end-point MI had occurred had the lowest mortality at 30 days and between 30 days and 6 months, and those with agreement that a MI had occurred had the highest mortality. CONCLUSION: CEC adjudication provides a standard, systematic, independent, and unbiased assessment of end-points, particularly for trials that span geographic regions and clinical practice settings. Understanding the review process and reasons for disagreement between CEC and site investigator assessments of MI is important to design future trials and interpret event rates between trials.
format Text
id pubmed-57750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-577502001-10-10 Disagreements between central clinical events committee and site investigator assessments of myocardial infarction endpoints in an international clinical trial: review of the PURSUIT study Mahaffey, Kenneth W Harrington, Robert A Akkerhuis, Martijn Kleiman, Neal S Berdan, Lisa G Crenshaw, Brian S Tardiff, Barbara E Granger, Christopher B DeJong, Ingrid Bhapkar, Manju Widimsky, Petr Corbalon, Ramón Lee, Kerry L Deckers, Jaap W Simoons, Maarten L Topol, Eric J Califf, Robert M Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med Research BACKGROUND: Limited information has been published regarding how specific processes for event adjudication can affect event rates in trials. We reviewed nonfatal myocardial infarctions (MIs) reported by site investigators in the international Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin (Eptifibatide) Therapy (PURSUIT) trial and those adjudicated by a central clinical events committee (CEC) to determine the reasons for differences in event rates. METHODS: The PURSUIT trial randomised 10,948 patients with acute coronary syndromes to receive eptifibatide or placebo. The primary end-point was death or post-enrolment MI at 30 days as assessed by the CEC; this end-point was also constructed using site-reported events. The CEC identified suspected MIs by systematic review of clinical, cardiac enzyme, and electrocardiographic data. RESULTS: The CEC identified 5005 (46%) suspected events, of which 1415 (28%) were adjudicated as MI. The site investigator and CEC assessments of whether a MI had occurred disagreed in 983 (20%) of the 5005 patients with suspected MI, mostly reflecting site misclassification of post-enrolment MIs (as enrolment MIs) or underreported periprocedural MIs. Patients for whom the CEC and site investigator agreed that no end-point MI had occurred had the lowest mortality at 30 days and between 30 days and 6 months, and those with agreement that a MI had occurred had the highest mortality. CONCLUSION: CEC adjudication provides a standard, systematic, independent, and unbiased assessment of end-points, particularly for trials that span geographic regions and clinical practice settings. Understanding the review process and reasons for disagreement between CEC and site investigator assessments of MI is important to design future trials and interpret event rates between trials. BioMed Central 2001 2001-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC57750/ /pubmed/11806794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-4-187 Text en Copyright © 2001 Mahaffey et al, licensee BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Research
Mahaffey, Kenneth W
Harrington, Robert A
Akkerhuis, Martijn
Kleiman, Neal S
Berdan, Lisa G
Crenshaw, Brian S
Tardiff, Barbara E
Granger, Christopher B
DeJong, Ingrid
Bhapkar, Manju
Widimsky, Petr
Corbalon, Ramón
Lee, Kerry L
Deckers, Jaap W
Simoons, Maarten L
Topol, Eric J
Califf, Robert M
Disagreements between central clinical events committee and site investigator assessments of myocardial infarction endpoints in an international clinical trial: review of the PURSUIT study
title Disagreements between central clinical events committee and site investigator assessments of myocardial infarction endpoints in an international clinical trial: review of the PURSUIT study
title_full Disagreements between central clinical events committee and site investigator assessments of myocardial infarction endpoints in an international clinical trial: review of the PURSUIT study
title_fullStr Disagreements between central clinical events committee and site investigator assessments of myocardial infarction endpoints in an international clinical trial: review of the PURSUIT study
title_full_unstemmed Disagreements between central clinical events committee and site investigator assessments of myocardial infarction endpoints in an international clinical trial: review of the PURSUIT study
title_short Disagreements between central clinical events committee and site investigator assessments of myocardial infarction endpoints in an international clinical trial: review of the PURSUIT study
title_sort disagreements between central clinical events committee and site investigator assessments of myocardial infarction endpoints in an international clinical trial: review of the pursuit study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC57750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11806794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-4-187
work_keys_str_mv AT mahaffeykennethw disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy
AT harringtonroberta disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy
AT akkerhuismartijn disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy
AT kleimanneals disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy
AT berdanlisag disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy
AT crenshawbrians disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy
AT tardiffbarbarae disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy
AT grangerchristopherb disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy
AT dejongingrid disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy
AT bhapkarmanju disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy
AT widimskypetr disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy
AT corbalonramon disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy
AT leekerryl disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy
AT deckersjaapw disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy
AT simoonsmaartenl disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy
AT topolericj disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy
AT califfrobertm disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy
AT disagreementsbetweencentralclinicaleventscommitteeandsiteinvestigatorassessmentsofmyocardialinfarctionendpointsinaninternationalclinicaltrialreviewofthepursuitstudy