Cargando…
Applications of random forest feature selection for fine‐scale genetic population assignment
Genetic population assignment used to inform wildlife management and conservation efforts requires panels of highly informative genetic markers and sensitive assignment tests. We explored the utility of machine‐learning algorithms (random forest, regularized random forest and guided regularized rand...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5775496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29387152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12524 |
_version_ | 1783293920293158912 |
---|---|
author | Sylvester, Emma V. A. Bentzen, Paul Bradbury, Ian R. Clément, Marie Pearce, Jon Horne, John Beiko, Robert G. |
author_facet | Sylvester, Emma V. A. Bentzen, Paul Bradbury, Ian R. Clément, Marie Pearce, Jon Horne, John Beiko, Robert G. |
author_sort | Sylvester, Emma V. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genetic population assignment used to inform wildlife management and conservation efforts requires panels of highly informative genetic markers and sensitive assignment tests. We explored the utility of machine‐learning algorithms (random forest, regularized random forest and guided regularized random forest) compared with F (ST) ranking for selection of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) for fine‐scale population assignment. We applied these methods to an unpublished SNP data set for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and a published SNP data set for Alaskan Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). In each species, we identified the minimum panel size required to obtain a self‐assignment accuracy of at least 90% using each method to create panels of 50–700 markers Panels of SNPs identified using random forest‐based methods performed up to 7.8 and 11.2 percentage points better than F (ST)‐selected panels of similar size for the Atlantic salmon and Chinook salmon data, respectively. Self‐assignment accuracy ≥90% was obtained with panels of 670 and 384 SNPs for each data set, respectively, a level of accuracy never reached for these species using F (ST)‐selected panels. Our results demonstrate a role for machine‐learning approaches in marker selection across large genomic data sets to improve assignment for management and conservation of exploited populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5775496 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57754962018-01-31 Applications of random forest feature selection for fine‐scale genetic population assignment Sylvester, Emma V. A. Bentzen, Paul Bradbury, Ian R. Clément, Marie Pearce, Jon Horne, John Beiko, Robert G. Evol Appl Original Articles Genetic population assignment used to inform wildlife management and conservation efforts requires panels of highly informative genetic markers and sensitive assignment tests. We explored the utility of machine‐learning algorithms (random forest, regularized random forest and guided regularized random forest) compared with F (ST) ranking for selection of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) for fine‐scale population assignment. We applied these methods to an unpublished SNP data set for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and a published SNP data set for Alaskan Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). In each species, we identified the minimum panel size required to obtain a self‐assignment accuracy of at least 90% using each method to create panels of 50–700 markers Panels of SNPs identified using random forest‐based methods performed up to 7.8 and 11.2 percentage points better than F (ST)‐selected panels of similar size for the Atlantic salmon and Chinook salmon data, respectively. Self‐assignment accuracy ≥90% was obtained with panels of 670 and 384 SNPs for each data set, respectively, a level of accuracy never reached for these species using F (ST)‐selected panels. Our results demonstrate a role for machine‐learning approaches in marker selection across large genomic data sets to improve assignment for management and conservation of exploited populations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5775496/ /pubmed/29387152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12524 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Sylvester, Emma V. A. Bentzen, Paul Bradbury, Ian R. Clément, Marie Pearce, Jon Horne, John Beiko, Robert G. Applications of random forest feature selection for fine‐scale genetic population assignment |
title | Applications of random forest feature selection for fine‐scale genetic population assignment |
title_full | Applications of random forest feature selection for fine‐scale genetic population assignment |
title_fullStr | Applications of random forest feature selection for fine‐scale genetic population assignment |
title_full_unstemmed | Applications of random forest feature selection for fine‐scale genetic population assignment |
title_short | Applications of random forest feature selection for fine‐scale genetic population assignment |
title_sort | applications of random forest feature selection for fine‐scale genetic population assignment |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5775496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29387152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12524 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sylvesteremmava applicationsofrandomforestfeatureselectionforfinescalegeneticpopulationassignment AT bentzenpaul applicationsofrandomforestfeatureselectionforfinescalegeneticpopulationassignment AT bradburyianr applicationsofrandomforestfeatureselectionforfinescalegeneticpopulationassignment AT clementmarie applicationsofrandomforestfeatureselectionforfinescalegeneticpopulationassignment AT pearcejon applicationsofrandomforestfeatureselectionforfinescalegeneticpopulationassignment AT hornejohn applicationsofrandomforestfeatureselectionforfinescalegeneticpopulationassignment AT beikorobertg applicationsofrandomforestfeatureselectionforfinescalegeneticpopulationassignment |