Cargando…
Leading for the long haul: a mixed-method evaluation of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS)
BACKGROUND: Despite our progress in understanding the organizational context for implementation and specifically the role of leadership in implementation, its role in sustainment has received little attention. This paper took a mixed-method approach to examine leadership during the sustainment phase...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5775537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29351767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0710-4 |
_version_ | 1783293929478684672 |
---|---|
author | Ehrhart, Mark G. Torres, Elisa M. Green, Amy E. Trott, Elise M. Willging, Cathleen E. Moullin, Joanna C. Aarons, Gregory A. |
author_facet | Ehrhart, Mark G. Torres, Elisa M. Green, Amy E. Trott, Elise M. Willging, Cathleen E. Moullin, Joanna C. Aarons, Gregory A. |
author_sort | Ehrhart, Mark G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite our progress in understanding the organizational context for implementation and specifically the role of leadership in implementation, its role in sustainment has received little attention. This paper took a mixed-method approach to examine leadership during the sustainment phase of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework. Utilizing the Implementation Leadership Scale as a foundation, we sought to develop a short, practical measure of sustainment leadership that can be used for both applied and research purposes. METHODS: Data for this study were collected as a part of a larger mixed-method study of evidence-based intervention, SafeCare®, sustainment. Quantitative data were collected from 157 providers using web-based surveys. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the factor structure of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS). Qualitative data were collected from 95 providers who participated in one of 15 focus groups. A framework approach guided qualitative data analysis. Mixed-method integration was also utilized to examine convergence of quantitative and qualitative findings. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the a priori higher order factor structure of the SLS with subscales indicating a single higher order sustainment leadership factor. The SLS demonstrated excellent internal consistency reliability. Qualitative analyses offered support for the dimensions of sustainment leadership captured by the quantitative measure, in addition to uncovering a fifth possible factor, available leadership. CONCLUSIONS: This study found qualitative and quantitative support for the pragmatic SLS measure. The SLS can be used for assessing leadership of first-level leaders to understand how staff perceive leadership during sustainment and to suggest areas where leaders could direct more attention in order to increase the likelihood that EBIs are institutionalized into the normal functioning of the organization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5775537 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57755372018-01-31 Leading for the long haul: a mixed-method evaluation of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS) Ehrhart, Mark G. Torres, Elisa M. Green, Amy E. Trott, Elise M. Willging, Cathleen E. Moullin, Joanna C. Aarons, Gregory A. Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: Despite our progress in understanding the organizational context for implementation and specifically the role of leadership in implementation, its role in sustainment has received little attention. This paper took a mixed-method approach to examine leadership during the sustainment phase of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework. Utilizing the Implementation Leadership Scale as a foundation, we sought to develop a short, practical measure of sustainment leadership that can be used for both applied and research purposes. METHODS: Data for this study were collected as a part of a larger mixed-method study of evidence-based intervention, SafeCare®, sustainment. Quantitative data were collected from 157 providers using web-based surveys. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the factor structure of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS). Qualitative data were collected from 95 providers who participated in one of 15 focus groups. A framework approach guided qualitative data analysis. Mixed-method integration was also utilized to examine convergence of quantitative and qualitative findings. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the a priori higher order factor structure of the SLS with subscales indicating a single higher order sustainment leadership factor. The SLS demonstrated excellent internal consistency reliability. Qualitative analyses offered support for the dimensions of sustainment leadership captured by the quantitative measure, in addition to uncovering a fifth possible factor, available leadership. CONCLUSIONS: This study found qualitative and quantitative support for the pragmatic SLS measure. The SLS can be used for assessing leadership of first-level leaders to understand how staff perceive leadership during sustainment and to suggest areas where leaders could direct more attention in order to increase the likelihood that EBIs are institutionalized into the normal functioning of the organization. BioMed Central 2018-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5775537/ /pubmed/29351767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0710-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Ehrhart, Mark G. Torres, Elisa M. Green, Amy E. Trott, Elise M. Willging, Cathleen E. Moullin, Joanna C. Aarons, Gregory A. Leading for the long haul: a mixed-method evaluation of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS) |
title | Leading for the long haul: a mixed-method evaluation of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS) |
title_full | Leading for the long haul: a mixed-method evaluation of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS) |
title_fullStr | Leading for the long haul: a mixed-method evaluation of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS) |
title_full_unstemmed | Leading for the long haul: a mixed-method evaluation of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS) |
title_short | Leading for the long haul: a mixed-method evaluation of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS) |
title_sort | leading for the long haul: a mixed-method evaluation of the sustainment leadership scale (sls) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5775537/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29351767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0710-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ehrhartmarkg leadingforthelonghaulamixedmethodevaluationofthesustainmentleadershipscalesls AT torreselisam leadingforthelonghaulamixedmethodevaluationofthesustainmentleadershipscalesls AT greenamye leadingforthelonghaulamixedmethodevaluationofthesustainmentleadershipscalesls AT trottelisem leadingforthelonghaulamixedmethodevaluationofthesustainmentleadershipscalesls AT willgingcathleene leadingforthelonghaulamixedmethodevaluationofthesustainmentleadershipscalesls AT moullinjoannac leadingforthelonghaulamixedmethodevaluationofthesustainmentleadershipscalesls AT aaronsgregorya leadingforthelonghaulamixedmethodevaluationofthesustainmentleadershipscalesls |