Cargando…

Leading for the long haul: a mixed-method evaluation of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS)

BACKGROUND: Despite our progress in understanding the organizational context for implementation and specifically the role of leadership in implementation, its role in sustainment has received little attention. This paper took a mixed-method approach to examine leadership during the sustainment phase...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ehrhart, Mark G., Torres, Elisa M., Green, Amy E., Trott, Elise M., Willging, Cathleen E., Moullin, Joanna C., Aarons, Gregory A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5775537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29351767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0710-4
_version_ 1783293929478684672
author Ehrhart, Mark G.
Torres, Elisa M.
Green, Amy E.
Trott, Elise M.
Willging, Cathleen E.
Moullin, Joanna C.
Aarons, Gregory A.
author_facet Ehrhart, Mark G.
Torres, Elisa M.
Green, Amy E.
Trott, Elise M.
Willging, Cathleen E.
Moullin, Joanna C.
Aarons, Gregory A.
author_sort Ehrhart, Mark G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite our progress in understanding the organizational context for implementation and specifically the role of leadership in implementation, its role in sustainment has received little attention. This paper took a mixed-method approach to examine leadership during the sustainment phase of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework. Utilizing the Implementation Leadership Scale as a foundation, we sought to develop a short, practical measure of sustainment leadership that can be used for both applied and research purposes. METHODS: Data for this study were collected as a part of a larger mixed-method study of evidence-based intervention, SafeCare®, sustainment. Quantitative data were collected from 157 providers using web-based surveys. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the factor structure of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS). Qualitative data were collected from 95 providers who participated in one of 15 focus groups. A framework approach guided qualitative data analysis. Mixed-method integration was also utilized to examine convergence of quantitative and qualitative findings. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the a priori higher order factor structure of the SLS with subscales indicating a single higher order sustainment leadership factor. The SLS demonstrated excellent internal consistency reliability. Qualitative analyses offered support for the dimensions of sustainment leadership captured by the quantitative measure, in addition to uncovering a fifth possible factor, available leadership. CONCLUSIONS: This study found qualitative and quantitative support for the pragmatic SLS measure. The SLS can be used for assessing leadership of first-level leaders to understand how staff perceive leadership during sustainment and to suggest areas where leaders could direct more attention in order to increase the likelihood that EBIs are institutionalized into the normal functioning of the organization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5775537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57755372018-01-31 Leading for the long haul: a mixed-method evaluation of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS) Ehrhart, Mark G. Torres, Elisa M. Green, Amy E. Trott, Elise M. Willging, Cathleen E. Moullin, Joanna C. Aarons, Gregory A. Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: Despite our progress in understanding the organizational context for implementation and specifically the role of leadership in implementation, its role in sustainment has received little attention. This paper took a mixed-method approach to examine leadership during the sustainment phase of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework. Utilizing the Implementation Leadership Scale as a foundation, we sought to develop a short, practical measure of sustainment leadership that can be used for both applied and research purposes. METHODS: Data for this study were collected as a part of a larger mixed-method study of evidence-based intervention, SafeCare®, sustainment. Quantitative data were collected from 157 providers using web-based surveys. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the factor structure of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS). Qualitative data were collected from 95 providers who participated in one of 15 focus groups. A framework approach guided qualitative data analysis. Mixed-method integration was also utilized to examine convergence of quantitative and qualitative findings. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the a priori higher order factor structure of the SLS with subscales indicating a single higher order sustainment leadership factor. The SLS demonstrated excellent internal consistency reliability. Qualitative analyses offered support for the dimensions of sustainment leadership captured by the quantitative measure, in addition to uncovering a fifth possible factor, available leadership. CONCLUSIONS: This study found qualitative and quantitative support for the pragmatic SLS measure. The SLS can be used for assessing leadership of first-level leaders to understand how staff perceive leadership during sustainment and to suggest areas where leaders could direct more attention in order to increase the likelihood that EBIs are institutionalized into the normal functioning of the organization. BioMed Central 2018-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5775537/ /pubmed/29351767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0710-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ehrhart, Mark G.
Torres, Elisa M.
Green, Amy E.
Trott, Elise M.
Willging, Cathleen E.
Moullin, Joanna C.
Aarons, Gregory A.
Leading for the long haul: a mixed-method evaluation of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS)
title Leading for the long haul: a mixed-method evaluation of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS)
title_full Leading for the long haul: a mixed-method evaluation of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS)
title_fullStr Leading for the long haul: a mixed-method evaluation of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS)
title_full_unstemmed Leading for the long haul: a mixed-method evaluation of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS)
title_short Leading for the long haul: a mixed-method evaluation of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS)
title_sort leading for the long haul: a mixed-method evaluation of the sustainment leadership scale (sls)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5775537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29351767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0710-4
work_keys_str_mv AT ehrhartmarkg leadingforthelonghaulamixedmethodevaluationofthesustainmentleadershipscalesls
AT torreselisam leadingforthelonghaulamixedmethodevaluationofthesustainmentleadershipscalesls
AT greenamye leadingforthelonghaulamixedmethodevaluationofthesustainmentleadershipscalesls
AT trottelisem leadingforthelonghaulamixedmethodevaluationofthesustainmentleadershipscalesls
AT willgingcathleene leadingforthelonghaulamixedmethodevaluationofthesustainmentleadershipscalesls
AT moullinjoannac leadingforthelonghaulamixedmethodevaluationofthesustainmentleadershipscalesls
AT aaronsgregorya leadingforthelonghaulamixedmethodevaluationofthesustainmentleadershipscalesls