Cargando…

Readmission rates in not-for-profit vs. proprietary hospitals before and after the hospital readmission reduction program implementation

BACKGROUND: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act established the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) to penalize hospitals with excessive 30-day hospital readmissions of Medicare enrollees for specific conditions. This policy was aimed at increasing the quality of care delivered...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Birmingham, Lauren E., Oglesby, Willie H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5775595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29351776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2840-4
_version_ 1783293943298916352
author Birmingham, Lauren E.
Oglesby, Willie H.
author_facet Birmingham, Lauren E.
Oglesby, Willie H.
author_sort Birmingham, Lauren E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act established the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) to penalize hospitals with excessive 30-day hospital readmissions of Medicare enrollees for specific conditions. This policy was aimed at increasing the quality of care delivered to patients and decreasing the amount of money paid for potentially preventable hospital readmissions. While it has been established that the number of 30-day hospital readmissions decreased after program implementation, it is unknown whether this effect occurred equally between not-for-profit and proprietary hospitals. The aim of this study was to determine whether or not the HRRP decreased readmission rates equally between not-for-profit and proprietary hospitals between 2010 and 2012. METHODS: Data on readmissions came from the Dartmouth Atlas and hospital ownership data came from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Data were joined using the Medicare provider number. Using a difference-in-differences approach, bivariate and regression analyses were conducted to compare readmission rates between not-for-profit and proprietary hospitals between 2010 and 2012 and were adjusted for hospital characteristics. RESULTS: In 2010, prior to program implementation, unadjusted readmission rates for proprietary and not-for-profit hospitals were 16.16% and 15.78%, respectively. In 2012, following program implementation, 30-day readmission rates dropped to 15.76% and 15.29% for proprietary and not-for-profit hospitals. The data suggest that the implementation of the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program had similar effects on not-for-profit and proprietary hospitals with respect to readmission rates, even after adjusting for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Although not-for-profit hospitals had lower 30-day readmission rates than proprietary hospitals in both 2010 and 2012, they both decreased after the implementation of the HRRP and the decreases were not statistically significantly different. Thus, this study suggests that the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program was equally effective in reducing readmission rates, despite ownership status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5775595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57755952018-01-31 Readmission rates in not-for-profit vs. proprietary hospitals before and after the hospital readmission reduction program implementation Birmingham, Lauren E. Oglesby, Willie H. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act established the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) to penalize hospitals with excessive 30-day hospital readmissions of Medicare enrollees for specific conditions. This policy was aimed at increasing the quality of care delivered to patients and decreasing the amount of money paid for potentially preventable hospital readmissions. While it has been established that the number of 30-day hospital readmissions decreased after program implementation, it is unknown whether this effect occurred equally between not-for-profit and proprietary hospitals. The aim of this study was to determine whether or not the HRRP decreased readmission rates equally between not-for-profit and proprietary hospitals between 2010 and 2012. METHODS: Data on readmissions came from the Dartmouth Atlas and hospital ownership data came from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Data were joined using the Medicare provider number. Using a difference-in-differences approach, bivariate and regression analyses were conducted to compare readmission rates between not-for-profit and proprietary hospitals between 2010 and 2012 and were adjusted for hospital characteristics. RESULTS: In 2010, prior to program implementation, unadjusted readmission rates for proprietary and not-for-profit hospitals were 16.16% and 15.78%, respectively. In 2012, following program implementation, 30-day readmission rates dropped to 15.76% and 15.29% for proprietary and not-for-profit hospitals. The data suggest that the implementation of the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program had similar effects on not-for-profit and proprietary hospitals with respect to readmission rates, even after adjusting for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Although not-for-profit hospitals had lower 30-day readmission rates than proprietary hospitals in both 2010 and 2012, they both decreased after the implementation of the HRRP and the decreases were not statistically significantly different. Thus, this study suggests that the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program was equally effective in reducing readmission rates, despite ownership status. BioMed Central 2018-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5775595/ /pubmed/29351776 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2840-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Birmingham, Lauren E.
Oglesby, Willie H.
Readmission rates in not-for-profit vs. proprietary hospitals before and after the hospital readmission reduction program implementation
title Readmission rates in not-for-profit vs. proprietary hospitals before and after the hospital readmission reduction program implementation
title_full Readmission rates in not-for-profit vs. proprietary hospitals before and after the hospital readmission reduction program implementation
title_fullStr Readmission rates in not-for-profit vs. proprietary hospitals before and after the hospital readmission reduction program implementation
title_full_unstemmed Readmission rates in not-for-profit vs. proprietary hospitals before and after the hospital readmission reduction program implementation
title_short Readmission rates in not-for-profit vs. proprietary hospitals before and after the hospital readmission reduction program implementation
title_sort readmission rates in not-for-profit vs. proprietary hospitals before and after the hospital readmission reduction program implementation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5775595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29351776
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2840-4
work_keys_str_mv AT birminghamlaurene readmissionratesinnotforprofitvsproprietaryhospitalsbeforeandafterthehospitalreadmissionreductionprogramimplementation
AT oglesbywillieh readmissionratesinnotforprofitvsproprietaryhospitalsbeforeandafterthehospitalreadmissionreductionprogramimplementation