Cargando…

Effect of Intermittent versus Continuous Light Exposure on Pupillary Light Response, As Evaluated by Pupillometry

OBJECTIVE: Continuous and intermittent stimuli with green light affect the pupillary light response (PLR) differently. Since the majority of pupillometric studies use blue and red lights, we investigated the effect of continuous and intermittent stimulations on the PLR using red and blue lights. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ba-Ali, Shakoor, Lund-Andersen, Henrik, Ahmadi, Hamid, Brøndsted, Adam Elias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5775973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29387040
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00746
_version_ 1783293998233812992
author Ba-Ali, Shakoor
Lund-Andersen, Henrik
Ahmadi, Hamid
Brøndsted, Adam Elias
author_facet Ba-Ali, Shakoor
Lund-Andersen, Henrik
Ahmadi, Hamid
Brøndsted, Adam Elias
author_sort Ba-Ali, Shakoor
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Continuous and intermittent stimuli with green light affect the pupillary light response (PLR) differently. Since the majority of pupillometric studies use blue and red lights, we investigated the effect of continuous and intermittent stimulations on the PLR using red and blue lights. METHODS: Seventeen healthy subjects underwent continuous- and intermittent light stimuli, using red (643 nm) and blue light (463 nm). To avoid the influence of pupil size on the amount of light entering the eye, the procedures were repeated with the stimulus–eye in dilated condition. The maximal pupillary constriction and the early redilation phase of post-illumination pupillary response (PIPR(Early)) represented the mixed response of melanopsin and rod–cone photoreceptors. The late redilation phase of PIPR (PIPR(Late)) was the marker of melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells. RESULTS: Intermittent stimuli with blue light elicited significantly larger maximal contraction during dilated condition (P = 0.001), and larger sustained pupillary contraction under dilated as well as undilated condition (P < 0.001) compared to continuous light exposure. Except the PIPR(Early) during undilated condition, none of the PIPR metrics were significantly different between intermittent and continuous blue light stimuli. Intermittent red light stimuli elicited also a more sustained pupillary contraction regardless of mydriatic instillation (P ≤ 0.02). In addition, intermittent red light exposure resulted in a slightly larger PIPR(Early) under undilated condition (P = 0.02) and a slightly larger PIPR(Late) under dilated condition (P = 0.049). Except the PIPR(Late) to continuous red light stimulus, all PIPR parameters were larger when the light was presented after induction of unilateral mydriasis. CONCLUSION: PLR parameters during and after light exposures depend on both the light stimulation mode and the entrance pupillary size.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5775973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57759732018-01-31 Effect of Intermittent versus Continuous Light Exposure on Pupillary Light Response, As Evaluated by Pupillometry Ba-Ali, Shakoor Lund-Andersen, Henrik Ahmadi, Hamid Brøndsted, Adam Elias Front Neurol Neuroscience OBJECTIVE: Continuous and intermittent stimuli with green light affect the pupillary light response (PLR) differently. Since the majority of pupillometric studies use blue and red lights, we investigated the effect of continuous and intermittent stimulations on the PLR using red and blue lights. METHODS: Seventeen healthy subjects underwent continuous- and intermittent light stimuli, using red (643 nm) and blue light (463 nm). To avoid the influence of pupil size on the amount of light entering the eye, the procedures were repeated with the stimulus–eye in dilated condition. The maximal pupillary constriction and the early redilation phase of post-illumination pupillary response (PIPR(Early)) represented the mixed response of melanopsin and rod–cone photoreceptors. The late redilation phase of PIPR (PIPR(Late)) was the marker of melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells. RESULTS: Intermittent stimuli with blue light elicited significantly larger maximal contraction during dilated condition (P = 0.001), and larger sustained pupillary contraction under dilated as well as undilated condition (P < 0.001) compared to continuous light exposure. Except the PIPR(Early) during undilated condition, none of the PIPR metrics were significantly different between intermittent and continuous blue light stimuli. Intermittent red light stimuli elicited also a more sustained pupillary contraction regardless of mydriatic instillation (P ≤ 0.02). In addition, intermittent red light exposure resulted in a slightly larger PIPR(Early) under undilated condition (P = 0.02) and a slightly larger PIPR(Late) under dilated condition (P = 0.049). Except the PIPR(Late) to continuous red light stimulus, all PIPR parameters were larger when the light was presented after induction of unilateral mydriasis. CONCLUSION: PLR parameters during and after light exposures depend on both the light stimulation mode and the entrance pupillary size. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-01-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5775973/ /pubmed/29387040 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00746 Text en Copyright © 2018 Ba-Ali, Lund-Andersen, Ahmadi and Brøndsted. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Ba-Ali, Shakoor
Lund-Andersen, Henrik
Ahmadi, Hamid
Brøndsted, Adam Elias
Effect of Intermittent versus Continuous Light Exposure on Pupillary Light Response, As Evaluated by Pupillometry
title Effect of Intermittent versus Continuous Light Exposure on Pupillary Light Response, As Evaluated by Pupillometry
title_full Effect of Intermittent versus Continuous Light Exposure on Pupillary Light Response, As Evaluated by Pupillometry
title_fullStr Effect of Intermittent versus Continuous Light Exposure on Pupillary Light Response, As Evaluated by Pupillometry
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Intermittent versus Continuous Light Exposure on Pupillary Light Response, As Evaluated by Pupillometry
title_short Effect of Intermittent versus Continuous Light Exposure on Pupillary Light Response, As Evaluated by Pupillometry
title_sort effect of intermittent versus continuous light exposure on pupillary light response, as evaluated by pupillometry
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5775973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29387040
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00746
work_keys_str_mv AT baalishakoor effectofintermittentversuscontinuouslightexposureonpupillarylightresponseasevaluatedbypupillometry
AT lundandersenhenrik effectofintermittentversuscontinuouslightexposureonpupillarylightresponseasevaluatedbypupillometry
AT ahmadihamid effectofintermittentversuscontinuouslightexposureonpupillarylightresponseasevaluatedbypupillometry
AT brøndstedadamelias effectofintermittentversuscontinuouslightexposureonpupillarylightresponseasevaluatedbypupillometry