Cargando…

Excisions of severe cervical dysplasia: Are there mandatory diameters of the cone that need to be considered?

OBJECTIVE: To achieve optimal depth for negative margin cones after loop electrosurgical excision procedures (LEEP) for cervical dysplasia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of LEEP cones of 201 patients with cervical dysplasia during a four-year period. Analysed cones were divided...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beyer, Daniel A., Rody, Achim, Schmidt, Natalie, Cirkel, Christoph, Neumann, Kay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5776157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29278231
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.2017.0036
_version_ 1783294027256299520
author Beyer, Daniel A.
Rody, Achim
Schmidt, Natalie
Cirkel, Christoph
Neumann, Kay
author_facet Beyer, Daniel A.
Rody, Achim
Schmidt, Natalie
Cirkel, Christoph
Neumann, Kay
author_sort Beyer, Daniel A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To achieve optimal depth for negative margin cones after loop electrosurgical excision procedures (LEEP) for cervical dysplasia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of LEEP cones of 201 patients with cervical dysplasia during a four-year period. Analysed cones were divided into two different groups: cones with negative margins without dysplasia, and cones with margins positive for dysplasia. In order to determine the cut-off value of the depth of the resected cones, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. RESULTS: Negative margins were found in 71.0% (n=49) of all cones, whereas positive margins were reported in 29.0% (n=20). Negative margin cones were achieved in 100% with a cone depth of ≥20 mm. A resection depth between 10-19.9 mm led to 73.0% negative margin cones. Calculation of cone volume shows for 2.0 cm3, a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 64%. Statistical analysis using an ROC model showed p=0.002. CONCLUSION: Forth greatest safety of patients, cone depths from LEEPs for cervical dysplasia should be ≥20 mm to achieve negative margins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5776157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57761572018-01-25 Excisions of severe cervical dysplasia: Are there mandatory diameters of the cone that need to be considered? Beyer, Daniel A. Rody, Achim Schmidt, Natalie Cirkel, Christoph Neumann, Kay J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc Original Investigation OBJECTIVE: To achieve optimal depth for negative margin cones after loop electrosurgical excision procedures (LEEP) for cervical dysplasia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of LEEP cones of 201 patients with cervical dysplasia during a four-year period. Analysed cones were divided into two different groups: cones with negative margins without dysplasia, and cones with margins positive for dysplasia. In order to determine the cut-off value of the depth of the resected cones, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. RESULTS: Negative margins were found in 71.0% (n=49) of all cones, whereas positive margins were reported in 29.0% (n=20). Negative margin cones were achieved in 100% with a cone depth of ≥20 mm. A resection depth between 10-19.9 mm led to 73.0% negative margin cones. Calculation of cone volume shows for 2.0 cm3, a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 64%. Statistical analysis using an ROC model showed p=0.002. CONCLUSION: Forth greatest safety of patients, cone depths from LEEPs for cervical dysplasia should be ≥20 mm to achieve negative margins. Galenos Publishing 2017-12 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5776157/ /pubmed/29278231 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.2017.0036 Text en ©Copyright 2017 by the Turkish-German Gynecological Education and Research Foundation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Beyer, Daniel A.
Rody, Achim
Schmidt, Natalie
Cirkel, Christoph
Neumann, Kay
Excisions of severe cervical dysplasia: Are there mandatory diameters of the cone that need to be considered?
title Excisions of severe cervical dysplasia: Are there mandatory diameters of the cone that need to be considered?
title_full Excisions of severe cervical dysplasia: Are there mandatory diameters of the cone that need to be considered?
title_fullStr Excisions of severe cervical dysplasia: Are there mandatory diameters of the cone that need to be considered?
title_full_unstemmed Excisions of severe cervical dysplasia: Are there mandatory diameters of the cone that need to be considered?
title_short Excisions of severe cervical dysplasia: Are there mandatory diameters of the cone that need to be considered?
title_sort excisions of severe cervical dysplasia: are there mandatory diameters of the cone that need to be considered?
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5776157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29278231
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.2017.0036
work_keys_str_mv AT beyerdaniela excisionsofseverecervicaldysplasiaaretheremandatorydiametersoftheconethatneedtobeconsidered
AT rodyachim excisionsofseverecervicaldysplasiaaretheremandatorydiametersoftheconethatneedtobeconsidered
AT schmidtnatalie excisionsofseverecervicaldysplasiaaretheremandatorydiametersoftheconethatneedtobeconsidered
AT cirkelchristoph excisionsofseverecervicaldysplasiaaretheremandatorydiametersoftheconethatneedtobeconsidered
AT neumannkay excisionsofseverecervicaldysplasiaaretheremandatorydiametersoftheconethatneedtobeconsidered