Cargando…
Excisions of severe cervical dysplasia: Are there mandatory diameters of the cone that need to be considered?
OBJECTIVE: To achieve optimal depth for negative margin cones after loop electrosurgical excision procedures (LEEP) for cervical dysplasia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of LEEP cones of 201 patients with cervical dysplasia during a four-year period. Analysed cones were divided...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Galenos Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5776157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29278231 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.2017.0036 |
_version_ | 1783294027256299520 |
---|---|
author | Beyer, Daniel A. Rody, Achim Schmidt, Natalie Cirkel, Christoph Neumann, Kay |
author_facet | Beyer, Daniel A. Rody, Achim Schmidt, Natalie Cirkel, Christoph Neumann, Kay |
author_sort | Beyer, Daniel A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To achieve optimal depth for negative margin cones after loop electrosurgical excision procedures (LEEP) for cervical dysplasia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of LEEP cones of 201 patients with cervical dysplasia during a four-year period. Analysed cones were divided into two different groups: cones with negative margins without dysplasia, and cones with margins positive for dysplasia. In order to determine the cut-off value of the depth of the resected cones, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. RESULTS: Negative margins were found in 71.0% (n=49) of all cones, whereas positive margins were reported in 29.0% (n=20). Negative margin cones were achieved in 100% with a cone depth of ≥20 mm. A resection depth between 10-19.9 mm led to 73.0% negative margin cones. Calculation of cone volume shows for 2.0 cm3, a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 64%. Statistical analysis using an ROC model showed p=0.002. CONCLUSION: Forth greatest safety of patients, cone depths from LEEPs for cervical dysplasia should be ≥20 mm to achieve negative margins. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5776157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Galenos Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57761572018-01-25 Excisions of severe cervical dysplasia: Are there mandatory diameters of the cone that need to be considered? Beyer, Daniel A. Rody, Achim Schmidt, Natalie Cirkel, Christoph Neumann, Kay J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc Original Investigation OBJECTIVE: To achieve optimal depth for negative margin cones after loop electrosurgical excision procedures (LEEP) for cervical dysplasia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of LEEP cones of 201 patients with cervical dysplasia during a four-year period. Analysed cones were divided into two different groups: cones with negative margins without dysplasia, and cones with margins positive for dysplasia. In order to determine the cut-off value of the depth of the resected cones, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. RESULTS: Negative margins were found in 71.0% (n=49) of all cones, whereas positive margins were reported in 29.0% (n=20). Negative margin cones were achieved in 100% with a cone depth of ≥20 mm. A resection depth between 10-19.9 mm led to 73.0% negative margin cones. Calculation of cone volume shows for 2.0 cm3, a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 64%. Statistical analysis using an ROC model showed p=0.002. CONCLUSION: Forth greatest safety of patients, cone depths from LEEPs for cervical dysplasia should be ≥20 mm to achieve negative margins. Galenos Publishing 2017-12 2017-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5776157/ /pubmed/29278231 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.2017.0036 Text en ©Copyright 2017 by the Turkish-German Gynecological Education and Research Foundation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Beyer, Daniel A. Rody, Achim Schmidt, Natalie Cirkel, Christoph Neumann, Kay Excisions of severe cervical dysplasia: Are there mandatory diameters of the cone that need to be considered? |
title | Excisions of severe cervical dysplasia: Are there mandatory diameters of the cone that need to be considered? |
title_full | Excisions of severe cervical dysplasia: Are there mandatory diameters of the cone that need to be considered? |
title_fullStr | Excisions of severe cervical dysplasia: Are there mandatory diameters of the cone that need to be considered? |
title_full_unstemmed | Excisions of severe cervical dysplasia: Are there mandatory diameters of the cone that need to be considered? |
title_short | Excisions of severe cervical dysplasia: Are there mandatory diameters of the cone that need to be considered? |
title_sort | excisions of severe cervical dysplasia: are there mandatory diameters of the cone that need to be considered? |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5776157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29278231 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.2017.0036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beyerdaniela excisionsofseverecervicaldysplasiaaretheremandatorydiametersoftheconethatneedtobeconsidered AT rodyachim excisionsofseverecervicaldysplasiaaretheremandatorydiametersoftheconethatneedtobeconsidered AT schmidtnatalie excisionsofseverecervicaldysplasiaaretheremandatorydiametersoftheconethatneedtobeconsidered AT cirkelchristoph excisionsofseverecervicaldysplasiaaretheremandatorydiametersoftheconethatneedtobeconsidered AT neumannkay excisionsofseverecervicaldysplasiaaretheremandatorydiametersoftheconethatneedtobeconsidered |