Cargando…

Comparison of up-front treatments for newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia -a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Corticosteroids such as prednisolone and dexamethasone have been established as up-front therapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia. Recent studies have indicated that other treatments such as rituximab or thrombopoietin receptor agonist can also be effective choices. We pe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arai, Yasuyuki, Jo, Tomoyasu, Matsui, Hiroyuki, Kondo, Tadakazu, Takaori-Kondo, Akifumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ferrata Storti Foundation 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5777203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28971908
http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2017.174615
_version_ 1783294176634339328
author Arai, Yasuyuki
Jo, Tomoyasu
Matsui, Hiroyuki
Kondo, Tadakazu
Takaori-Kondo, Akifumi
author_facet Arai, Yasuyuki
Jo, Tomoyasu
Matsui, Hiroyuki
Kondo, Tadakazu
Takaori-Kondo, Akifumi
author_sort Arai, Yasuyuki
collection PubMed
description Corticosteroids such as prednisolone and dexamethasone have been established as up-front therapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia. Recent studies have indicated that other treatments such as rituximab or thrombopoietin receptor agonist can also be effective choices. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to establish a clinically meaningful hierarchy of efficacy and safety of treatments for newly diagnosed primary immune thrombocytopenia in adults. Randomized controlled trials evaluating medical treatments for newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia were included. Reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The main outcome was the sustained response (platelet count >30×10(9)/L for 3–6 months after completion of treatments), while overall response (platelet count >30×10(9)/L for 2–4 weeks after initiation of the up-front treatment) and therapy-related adverse events were the secondary endpoints. A total of 21 randomized controlled trials (1898 patients) were included in this study. Our main findings were a significantly better sustained response in the recombinant human thrombopoietin+dexamethasone and rituximab+dexamethasone arms compared to those of conventional therapies (prednisolone and dexamethasone monotherapy). Moreover, recombinant human thrombopoietin+dexamethasone and +prednisolone improved early overall response compared to prednisolone, dexamethasone, and rituximab-containing regimens. Therapy-related adverse events showed similar profiles and were tolerable in all treatment arms. Regimens containing recombinant human thrombopoietin agonist may be beneficial up-front therapies in addition to the conventional corticosteroid monotherapies. Future head-to-head trials including these regimens and rituximab-containing treatments are necessary in order to overcome the limitations of the small number in our study and determine the most suitable initial therapies for newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5777203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Ferrata Storti Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57772032018-02-02 Comparison of up-front treatments for newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia -a systematic review and network meta-analysis Arai, Yasuyuki Jo, Tomoyasu Matsui, Hiroyuki Kondo, Tadakazu Takaori-Kondo, Akifumi Haematologica Article Corticosteroids such as prednisolone and dexamethasone have been established as up-front therapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia. Recent studies have indicated that other treatments such as rituximab or thrombopoietin receptor agonist can also be effective choices. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to establish a clinically meaningful hierarchy of efficacy and safety of treatments for newly diagnosed primary immune thrombocytopenia in adults. Randomized controlled trials evaluating medical treatments for newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia were included. Reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. The main outcome was the sustained response (platelet count >30×10(9)/L for 3–6 months after completion of treatments), while overall response (platelet count >30×10(9)/L for 2–4 weeks after initiation of the up-front treatment) and therapy-related adverse events were the secondary endpoints. A total of 21 randomized controlled trials (1898 patients) were included in this study. Our main findings were a significantly better sustained response in the recombinant human thrombopoietin+dexamethasone and rituximab+dexamethasone arms compared to those of conventional therapies (prednisolone and dexamethasone monotherapy). Moreover, recombinant human thrombopoietin+dexamethasone and +prednisolone improved early overall response compared to prednisolone, dexamethasone, and rituximab-containing regimens. Therapy-related adverse events showed similar profiles and were tolerable in all treatment arms. Regimens containing recombinant human thrombopoietin agonist may be beneficial up-front therapies in addition to the conventional corticosteroid monotherapies. Future head-to-head trials including these regimens and rituximab-containing treatments are necessary in order to overcome the limitations of the small number in our study and determine the most suitable initial therapies for newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia. Ferrata Storti Foundation 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5777203/ /pubmed/28971908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2017.174615 Text en Copyright© 2018 Ferrata Storti Foundation Material published in Haematologica is covered by copyright. All rights are reserved to the Ferrata Storti Foundation. Use of published material is allowed under the following terms and conditions: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode. Copies of published material are allowed for personal or internal use. Sharing published material for non-commercial purposes is subject to the following conditions: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode, sect. 3. Reproducing and sharing published material for commercial purposes is not allowed without permission in writing from the publisher.
spellingShingle Article
Arai, Yasuyuki
Jo, Tomoyasu
Matsui, Hiroyuki
Kondo, Tadakazu
Takaori-Kondo, Akifumi
Comparison of up-front treatments for newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia -a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title Comparison of up-front treatments for newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia -a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of up-front treatments for newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia -a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of up-front treatments for newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia -a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of up-front treatments for newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia -a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of up-front treatments for newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia -a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of up-front treatments for newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia -a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5777203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28971908
http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2017.174615
work_keys_str_mv AT araiyasuyuki comparisonofupfronttreatmentsfornewlydiagnosedimmunethrombocytopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT jotomoyasu comparisonofupfronttreatmentsfornewlydiagnosedimmunethrombocytopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT matsuihiroyuki comparisonofupfronttreatmentsfornewlydiagnosedimmunethrombocytopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT kondotadakazu comparisonofupfronttreatmentsfornewlydiagnosedimmunethrombocytopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT takaorikondoakifumi comparisonofupfronttreatmentsfornewlydiagnosedimmunethrombocytopeniaasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis