Cargando…

Debris extrusion and foraminal deformation produced by reciprocating instruments made of thermally treated NiTi wires

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris, percentage of foraminal enlargement and apical foramen (AF) deformation that occurred during root canal preparation with different reciprocation systems: Reciproc, WaveOne (M-Wire), and ProDesign R (Shape Memory Technology Wire) at two d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frota, Myrna Maria Arcanjo, Bernardes, Ricardo Affonso, Vivan, Rodrigo Ricci, Vivacqua-Gomes, Nilton, Duarte, Marco Antonio Hungaro, de Vasconcelos, Bruno Carvalho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5777412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29364346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0215
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris, percentage of foraminal enlargement and apical foramen (AF) deformation that occurred during root canal preparation with different reciprocation systems: Reciproc, WaveOne (M-Wire), and ProDesign R (Shape Memory Technology Wire) at two different working lengths (WLs): 0.0 and 1.0 mm beyond the AF. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The AF of 120 root canals in 60 mesial roots of mandibular molars were photographed with stereomicroscope and randomly assigned into four groups: manual, Reciproc (REC), WaveOne (WO), and ProDesign R (PDR); subsequently, they were further subdivided according to the WL (n=15). Teeth were instrumented, coupled to a dual collecting chamber, and then another photograph of each AF was captured. Extrusion was analysed by determining the weight of extruded debris. Each AF diameter was measured in pre- and post-instrumentation images to determine deformation, which was analysed, and afterwards the final format of AFs was classified (circular/oval/deformed). RESULTS: We found no significant differences when analysing each system at different WLs. When considering each WL, REC and WO showed highest extrusion values (P<.05); for AF enlargement, differences were observed only for WO, when it was used beyond the AF; differences were observed among M-Wire groups beyond the AF (P<.05). AF deformation was observed in all groups; PDR showed the lowest AF deformation values at both WLs; M-Wire groups showed 50% strain beyond the AF. CONCLUSION: Authors concluded that beyond the apical limit, the alloy and taper are important aspects when considering extrusion and deformation.