Cargando…
The safety of fertility and ipsilateral ovary procedures for borderline ovarian tumors
OBJECTIVE: To explore the optimal treatment options for women with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of consecutive patients with BOTs in two academic institutions were retrospectively collected. The pertinent data, including clinicopathological characteris...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5777807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29383195 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23021 |
_version_ | 1783294252807094272 |
---|---|
author | Lou, Tong Yuan, Fang Feng, Ying Wang, Shuzhen Bai, Huimin Zhang, Zhenyu |
author_facet | Lou, Tong Yuan, Fang Feng, Ying Wang, Shuzhen Bai, Huimin Zhang, Zhenyu |
author_sort | Lou, Tong |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To explore the optimal treatment options for women with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of consecutive patients with BOTs in two academic institutions were retrospectively collected. The pertinent data, including clinicopathological characteristics and, treatment and prognostic information were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 281 cases of BOTs were included in this analysis. For the entire series, the 5- year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 91.8% and 98.5%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, reservation of the ipsilateral ovary (HR: 0.104 [95% CI, 0.036–0.304], p = 0.000) and FIGO stage II–III (HR: 6.811 [95% CI, 2.700–17.181], p = 0.000) were the independent risk factors for recurrence. Ovarian surface involvement (HR: 64.996 [95% CI, 4.054–1041.941], p = 0.003) was the only independent prognostic factor for OS. Lymphadenectomy and adjunct chemotherapy had no significant impact on patients’ recurrence and survival (recurrence: p = 0.332 and 0.290, respectively, survival: p = 0.896 and 0.216, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Fertility-sparing surgery with healthy ovarian preservation seems safe and feasible for young women who prefer fertility-sparing treatment. Ovarian cystectomy to conserve the affected ovary/ovaries without ovarian surface involvement may be cautiously performed under fully informed consent for young women with bilateral BOTs who strongly prefer fertility-sparing treatment and have no evidence of infertility. However, long-term follow-up is necessary due to the relapse susceptibility of the ovary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5777807 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57778072018-01-30 The safety of fertility and ipsilateral ovary procedures for borderline ovarian tumors Lou, Tong Yuan, Fang Feng, Ying Wang, Shuzhen Bai, Huimin Zhang, Zhenyu Oncotarget Clinical Research Paper OBJECTIVE: To explore the optimal treatment options for women with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of consecutive patients with BOTs in two academic institutions were retrospectively collected. The pertinent data, including clinicopathological characteristics and, treatment and prognostic information were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 281 cases of BOTs were included in this analysis. For the entire series, the 5- year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 91.8% and 98.5%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, reservation of the ipsilateral ovary (HR: 0.104 [95% CI, 0.036–0.304], p = 0.000) and FIGO stage II–III (HR: 6.811 [95% CI, 2.700–17.181], p = 0.000) were the independent risk factors for recurrence. Ovarian surface involvement (HR: 64.996 [95% CI, 4.054–1041.941], p = 0.003) was the only independent prognostic factor for OS. Lymphadenectomy and adjunct chemotherapy had no significant impact on patients’ recurrence and survival (recurrence: p = 0.332 and 0.290, respectively, survival: p = 0.896 and 0.216, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Fertility-sparing surgery with healthy ovarian preservation seems safe and feasible for young women who prefer fertility-sparing treatment. Ovarian cystectomy to conserve the affected ovary/ovaries without ovarian surface involvement may be cautiously performed under fully informed consent for young women with bilateral BOTs who strongly prefer fertility-sparing treatment and have no evidence of infertility. However, long-term follow-up is necessary due to the relapse susceptibility of the ovary. Impact Journals LLC 2017-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5777807/ /pubmed/29383195 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23021 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Lou et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Paper Lou, Tong Yuan, Fang Feng, Ying Wang, Shuzhen Bai, Huimin Zhang, Zhenyu The safety of fertility and ipsilateral ovary procedures for borderline ovarian tumors |
title | The safety of fertility and ipsilateral ovary procedures for borderline ovarian tumors |
title_full | The safety of fertility and ipsilateral ovary procedures for borderline ovarian tumors |
title_fullStr | The safety of fertility and ipsilateral ovary procedures for borderline ovarian tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | The safety of fertility and ipsilateral ovary procedures for borderline ovarian tumors |
title_short | The safety of fertility and ipsilateral ovary procedures for borderline ovarian tumors |
title_sort | safety of fertility and ipsilateral ovary procedures for borderline ovarian tumors |
topic | Clinical Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5777807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29383195 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loutong thesafetyoffertilityandipsilateralovaryproceduresforborderlineovariantumors AT yuanfang thesafetyoffertilityandipsilateralovaryproceduresforborderlineovariantumors AT fengying thesafetyoffertilityandipsilateralovaryproceduresforborderlineovariantumors AT wangshuzhen thesafetyoffertilityandipsilateralovaryproceduresforborderlineovariantumors AT baihuimin thesafetyoffertilityandipsilateralovaryproceduresforborderlineovariantumors AT zhangzhenyu thesafetyoffertilityandipsilateralovaryproceduresforborderlineovariantumors AT loutong safetyoffertilityandipsilateralovaryproceduresforborderlineovariantumors AT yuanfang safetyoffertilityandipsilateralovaryproceduresforborderlineovariantumors AT fengying safetyoffertilityandipsilateralovaryproceduresforborderlineovariantumors AT wangshuzhen safetyoffertilityandipsilateralovaryproceduresforborderlineovariantumors AT baihuimin safetyoffertilityandipsilateralovaryproceduresforborderlineovariantumors AT zhangzhenyu safetyoffertilityandipsilateralovaryproceduresforborderlineovariantumors |